rfc9676.original.xml | rfc9676.xml | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> | <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> | |||
<!DOCTYPE rfc [ | <!DOCTYPE rfc [ | |||
<!ENTITY nbsp " "> | <!ENTITY nbsp " "> | |||
<!ENTITY zwsp "​"> | <!ENTITY zwsp "​"> | |||
<!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> | <!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> | |||
<!ENTITY wj "⁠"> | <!ENTITY wj "⁠"> | |||
]> | ]> | |||
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?> | ||||
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.18 (Ruby 3.0. | <rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft | |||
2) --> | -spinosa-urn-lex-24" number="9676" updates="" obsoletes="" category="info" submi | |||
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft | ssionType="independent" tocInclude="true" version="3" xml:lang="en" symRefs="tru | |||
-spinosa-urn-lex-24" category="info" submissionType="independent" version="3"> | e" sortRefs="true"> | |||
<!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.22.0 --> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title abbrev="URN LEX Namespace for Sources of Law">A Uniform Resource Name | <!-- [rfced] Title | |||
(URN) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX)</title> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24"/> | a) May we update the document title in one of the following ways? The current | |||
placement of "(LEX)" makes it seem like LEX is an abbreviation. | ||||
Current: | ||||
A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX) | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
LEX: A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law | ||||
Or: | ||||
"lex": A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law | ||||
b) Similarly, may we update the abbreviated title (appears in the running | ||||
header at the top of each page in the pdf output) in one of the following | ||||
ways? | ||||
Current: | ||||
URN LEX Namespace for Sources of Law | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
LEX: URN Namespace for Sources of Law | ||||
Or: | ||||
"lex": URN Namespace for Sources of Law | ||||
--> | ||||
<title abbrev="URN LEX Namespace for Sources of Law">A Uniform Resource Name (UR | ||||
N) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX)</title> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9676"/> | ||||
<author initials="P." surname="Spinosa" fullname="PierLuigi Spinosa"> | <author initials="P." surname="Spinosa" fullname="PierLuigi Spinosa"> | |||
<organization/> | ||||
<address> | <address> | |||
<postal> | <postal> | |||
<street>Via Zanardelli, 15</street> | <street>Via Zanardelli, 15</street> | |||
<city>Firenze</city> | <city>Firenze</city> | |||
<code>50136</code> | <code>50136</code> | |||
<country>Italy</country> | <country>Italy</country> | |||
</postal> | </postal> | |||
<phone>+39 339 5614056</phone> | <phone>+39 339 5614056</phone> | |||
<email>pierluigi.spinosa@gmail.com</email> | <email>pierluigi.spinosa@gmail.com</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
skipping to change at line 42 ¶ | skipping to change at line 68 ¶ | |||
<street>Via de' Barucci, 20</street> | <street>Via de' Barucci, 20</street> | |||
<city>Firenze</city> | <city>Firenze</city> | |||
<code>50127</code> | <code>50127</code> | |||
<country>Italy</country> | <country>Italy</country> | |||
</postal> | </postal> | |||
<phone>+39 055 43995</phone> | <phone>+39 055 43995</phone> | |||
<email>enrico.francesconi@cnr.it</email> | <email>enrico.francesconi@cnr.it</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author initials="C." surname="Lupo" fullname="Caterina Lupo"> | <author initials="C." surname="Lupo" fullname="Caterina Lupo"> | |||
<organization/> | ||||
<address> | <address> | |||
<postal> | <postal> | |||
<street>Via San Fabiano, 25</street> | <street>Via San Fabiano, 25</street> | |||
<city>Roma</city> | <city>Roma</city> | |||
<code>117</code> | <code>117</code> | |||
<country>Italy</country> | <country>Italy</country> | |||
</postal> | </postal> | |||
<phone>+39 3382632348</phone> | <phone>+39 3382632348</phone> | |||
<email>caterina.lupo@gmail.com</email> | <email>caterina.lupo@gmail.com</email> | |||
</address> | </address> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2024" month="August" day="17"/> | <date year="2024" month="November"/> | |||
<!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in | ||||
the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. --> | ||||
<keyword>example</keyword> | ||||
<abstract> | <abstract> | |||
<?line 154?> | <!-- [rfced] Would including "LEX" or "lex" in the abstract be helpful to | |||
readers? | ||||
<t>This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace | Original: | |||
Identifier for identifying, naming, assigning, | This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace | |||
and managing persistent resources in the legal domain. This | Identifier for identifying, naming, assigning, and managing | |||
specification is published to allow adoption of a common convention | persistent resources in the legal domain. | |||
by multiple jurisdictions to facilitate ease of reference and access | ||||
to resources in the legal domain.<br/> | Perhaps: | |||
This specification is an independent submission to the RFC series. | This document describes LEX, a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace | |||
It is not a standard, and does not have the consensus of the IETF.</t> | identifier that identifies, names, assigns, and manages | |||
persistent resources in the legal domain. | ||||
Or: | ||||
This document describes "lex", a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace | ||||
identifier that identifies, names, assigns, and manages | ||||
persistent resources in the legal domain. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace identifier | ||||
for identifying, naming, assigning, and managing persistent resources in the | ||||
legal domain. This specification allows adoption of a common | ||||
convention by multiple jurisdictions to facilitate ease of reference and | ||||
access to resources in the legal domain.</t> | ||||
<t>This specification is an Independent | ||||
Submission to the RFC Series. It is not a standard and does not have the | ||||
consensus of the IETF.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | </abstract> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<middle> | <middle> | |||
<?line 165?> | ||||
<section anchor="introduction"> | <section anchor="introduction"> | |||
<name>Introduction</name> | <name>Introduction</name> | |||
<section anchor="the-purpose-of-namespace-lex"> | <section anchor="the-purpose-of-namespace-lex"> | |||
<name>The Purpose of Namespace "lex"</name> | <name>Purpose of the "lex" Namespace</name> | |||
<t>The purpose of the "lex" namespace is to assign a unique | <t>The purpose of the "lex" namespace is to assign a unique identifier | |||
identifier in a well-defined format to documents that are sources of | in a well-defined format to documents that are sources of law. | |||
law. In this context, "sources of law" include any | In this context, "sources of law" include any legal document within the domain | |||
legal document within the domain of legislation, case law and | of legislation, case law, administrative acts, or regulations. Potential | |||
administrative acts or regulations. Potential sources of | sources of law (acts under the process of law formation, such as bills) are | |||
law (acts under the process of law formation, as bills) are included | included as well. "Legal doctrine", that is, the body of knowledge and | |||
as well. "Legal doctrine", that is the body of knowledge and theoretical | theoretical speculation typical of legal scholars (e.g., commentary on | |||
speculation typical of legal scholars (e.g. commentary on judgment,<br/> | judgment, jurisprudence review, commentary on legislation, encyclopedic | |||
jurisprudence review, commentary on legislation, encyclopedic entries, | entries, monographs, articles in magazines, manuals, etc.) is explicitly not | |||
monographs, articles in magazines, manuals, etc.) is explicitly not covered.</t> | covered.</t> | |||
<t>The identifier is conceived so that its construction depends only on | <t>The identifier is conceived so that its construction depends only on | |||
the content of the document itself and not its on-line availability, its | the content of the document itself and not its online availability, physical loc | |||
physical location, and access mode. The identifier itself is assigned | ation, and access mode. The identifier itself is assigned | |||
by the jurisdiction of the identified document. Even a document that | by the jurisdiction of the identified document. A document that | |||
is not available online may, nevertheless, have a LEX URN identifier.</t> | is not available online may, nevertheless, have a LEX URN identifier.</t> | |||
<t>The lex URN may be used as a way to represent references (and | <t>The lex URN may be used as a way to represent references (and | |||
more generally, any type of relation) among various sources of law. | more generally, any type of relation) among various sources of law. | |||
In an on-line environment with resources distributed among different | In an online environment with resources distributed among different | |||
web publishers, lex URNs | web publishers, lex URNs | |||
allow a simplified global interconnection of legal documents by means | allow a simplified global interconnection of legal documents by means | |||
of automated resoluton. LEX URNs consist of persistent and | of automated resolution. | |||
LEX URNs consist of persistent and | ||||
location-independent identifiers and are particularly | location-independent identifiers and are particularly | |||
useful when they can be mapped into or associated with locators such | useful when they can be mapped into or associated with locators such | |||
as HTTP URLs. Moreover, LEX URNs details can be used as a reference | as HTTP URLs. Moreover, LEX URN details can be used as a reference | |||
to create HTTP-based persistent and location-independent identifiers | to create persistent and location-independent identifiers that are HTTP-based | |||
<xref target="RFC3986"/>.</t> | <xref target="RFC3986"/>.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="background"> | <section anchor="background"> | |||
<name>Background</name> | <name>Background</name> | |||
<t>This specification of a unique identifier for legal documents | <t>This specification of a unique identifier for legal documents | |||
follows a number of initiatives in the field of legal document | follows a number of initiatives in the field of legal document | |||
management.</t> | management.</t> | |||
<t>Since 2001 the Italian Government, through the National Center for | ||||
Information Technology in the Public Administration, the Ministry of | <t>Since 2001, the Italian Government promoted the NormeInRete project | |||
Justice and CNR (the National Research Council of Italy) promoted | through the National Center for Information Technology in the Public | |||
the NormeInRete project. It was aimed at introducing standards for | Administration, the Ministry of Justice, and the National Research | |||
sources of law description and identification using XML and URN | Council of Italy (CNR). The NormeInRete project was aimed at introducing | |||
techniques.</t> | standards for describing and identifying sources | |||
of law using XML and URN | ||||
techniques.</t> | ||||
<t>Other national initiatives in Europe introduced standards for the | <t>Other national initiatives in Europe introduced standards for the | |||
description of legal sources <xref target="FRAN"/>. Collaborations | description of legal sources <xref target="FRAN"/>. Collaborations | |||
between government, national research institutes, and | between government, national research institutes, and | |||
universities, have defined national XML standards for legal document | universities have defined national XML standards for legal document | |||
management, as well as schemes for legal document identification. | management, as well as schemes for legal document identification. | |||
Outside of Europe, similar initiatives have addressed similar problems | Outside of Europe, similar initiatives have addressed similar problems | |||
<xref target="FRAN"/>. Several of these identifiers are based on a URN schema.< | <xref target="FRAN"/>. | |||
/t> | Several of these identifiers are based on a URN schema.</t> | |||
<t>In today's information society the processes of political, social and | ||||
economic integration of European Union member states as well as the | <!-- [rfced] Please review "legal information knowledge". Would simply "legal | |||
increasing integration of the world-wide legal and economic processes | information" be correct here? We note that "legal information" is used in | |||
are causing a growing interest in exchanging legal information | the sentence that follows. | |||
knowledge at national and trans-national levels. | ||||
Original: | ||||
In today's information society the processes of political, social and | ||||
economic integration of European Union member states as well as the | ||||
increasing integration of the world-wide legal and economic processes | ||||
are causing a growing interest in exchanging legal information | ||||
knowledge at national and trans-national levels. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
In today's information society, the processes of political, social | ||||
and economic integration of European Union (EU) member states, as | ||||
well as the increasing integration of the worldwide legal and | ||||
economic processes, are causing a growing interest in the exchange of | ||||
legal information at national and transnational levels. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>In today's information society, the processes of political, social, an | ||||
d | ||||
economic integration of European Union (EU) member states, as well as the | ||||
increasing integration of the worldwide legal and economic processes, | ||||
are causing a growing interest in the exchange of legal information | ||||
knowledge at national and transnational levels. | ||||
The growing desire for improved quality and accessibility of legal | The growing desire for improved quality and accessibility of legal | |||
information amplifies the need for interoperability among legal | information amplifies the need for interoperability among legal | |||
information systems across national boundaries. A common well-defined | information systems across national boundaries. A common, well-defined | |||
schema used to identify sources of law at international level is an | schema used to identify sources of law at an international level is an | |||
essential prerequisite for interoperability.</t> | essential prerequisite for interoperability.</t> | |||
<t>Interest groups within several countries have already expressed their | <t>Interest groups within several countries have already expressed | |||
intention to adopt a shared solution based on a URN technique.<br/> | their intention to adopt a shared solution based on a URN technique. | |||
The need for a unique identifier of sources of law in different | ||||
EU Member States, based on open standards and able to provide | <!-- [rfced] FYI: We updated this long sentences as follows to improve | |||
advanced modalities of document hyper-linking, has been expressed in | clarity. Let us know any concerns. | |||
several conferences (as <xref target="LVI"/>) by representatives of the Publicat | ||||
ions | Original: | |||
Office of the European Union (OP), with the aim of promoting | The need for a unique identifier of sources of law in different EU | |||
interoperability among national and European institution information | Member States, based on open standards and able to provide advanced | |||
systems. Similar concerns have been raised by international groups | modalities of document hyper-linking, has been expressed in several | |||
concerned with free access to legal information, and the Permanent | conferences (as [LVI]) by representatives of the Publications Office | |||
Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law <xref target="HCPIL" | of the European Union (OP), with the aim of promoting | |||
/> | interoperability among national and European institution information | |||
that encourage State Parties to "adopt neutral methods of citation of | systems. | |||
their legal materials, including methods that are medium-neutral, | ||||
provider-neutral and internationally consistent.". In a similar | Updated: | |||
direction the CEN Metalex initiative is moving, at European level, | In several conferences (such as [LVI]), representatives of the | |||
towards the definition of a standard interchange format for sources | Publications Office of the European Union (OP) have expressed the | |||
of law, including recommendations for defining naming conventions to | need for a unique identifier for sources of law, based on open | |||
them.</t> | standards and able to provide advanced modalities of document | |||
<t>The need of unique identifiers for sources of law is of | hyperlinking, with the aim of promoting interoperability among | |||
particular interest also in the domain of case law. This is | national and European institution information systems. | |||
--> | ||||
In several conferences (such as <xref target="LVI"/>), representatives | ||||
of the Publications Office of the European Union (OP) have expressed | ||||
the need for a unique identifier for sources of law, | ||||
based on open standards and able to provide advanced | ||||
modalities of document hyperlinking, with the aim of promoting | ||||
interoperability among national and European institution information | ||||
systems. | ||||
Similar concerns have been raised by | ||||
international groups concerned with free access to legal information, | ||||
and the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private | ||||
International Law <xref target="HCPIL"/> encourages State Parties | ||||
to "adopt neutral methods of citation of their legal materials, | ||||
including methods that are medium-neutral, provider-neutral and | ||||
internationally consistent". | ||||
In a similar direction, the CEN Metalex | ||||
initiative is moving, at the European level, towards the definition of a | ||||
standard interchange format for sources of law, including | ||||
recommendations for defining naming conventions for them.</t> | ||||
<t>Additionally, the need for unique identifiers for sources of law is o | ||||
f | ||||
particular interest in the domain of case law. | ||||
<!-- [rfced] We are having trouble parsing the following sentence. Please | ||||
clarify. | ||||
Original: | ||||
This is acutely felt within both common law systems, where cases are | ||||
the main law sources, and civil law systems, in order to provide an integrate | ||||
d | ||||
access to cases and legislation, as well as to track the relationships betwee | ||||
n | ||||
them. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
This need is acutely felt within both common law systems (where cases are | ||||
the main law sources) and civil law systems, because unique identifiers can p | ||||
rovide | ||||
integrated access to cases and legislation, as well as the ability to track t | ||||
he | ||||
relationships between them. | ||||
--> | ||||
This is | ||||
acutely felt within both common law systems, where cases are the | acutely felt within both common law systems, where cases are the | |||
main law sources, and civil law systems, in order to | main law sources, and civil law systems, in order to | |||
provide an integrated access to cases and legislation, as well as | provide an integrated access to cases and legislation, as well as | |||
to track the relationships between them. This domain is characterized | to track the relationships between them. This domain is characterized | |||
by a high degree of fragmentation in case law information systems, | by a high degree of fragmentation in case law information systems, | |||
which usually lack interoperability.</t> | which usually lack interoperability.</t> | |||
<t>In the European Union, the community institutions have stressed the | <t>In the European Union, the community institutions have stressed the | |||
need for citizens, businesses, lawyers, prosecutors and judges to | need for citizens, businesses, lawyers, prosecutors, and judges to | |||
become more aware not only of (directly applicable) EU law, but also | become more aware of (directly applicable) EU laws and also | |||
of the various national legal systems. The growing importance of | the various national legal systems. | |||
national judiciaries for the application of Community law was | ||||
<!-- [rfced] We are having trouble understanding the part of the first | ||||
sentence below starting with "in view of...". Also, is "In this view" | ||||
needed in the second sentence? Please review. | ||||
Original: | ||||
Similarly the Council of the European Union has underlined the | ||||
importance of cross-border access to national case law, as well as | ||||
the need for its standardisation, in view of an integrated access in | ||||
a decentralized architecture. In this view the Working Party on | ||||
Legal Data Processing (e-Law) of the Council of the European Union | ||||
formed a task group to study the possibilities for improving cross- | ||||
border access to national case law. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
Similarly, the Council of the European Union has underlined the | ||||
importance of cross-border access to national case law, as well as | ||||
the need for its standardization, with a vision of a | ||||
decentralized architecture with integrated access. | ||||
The Working Party on | ||||
Legal Data Processing (e-Law) of the Council of the European Union | ||||
formed a task group to study the possibilities for improving cross- | ||||
border access to national case law. | ||||
--> | ||||
The growing importance of | ||||
national judiciaries for the application of community law was | ||||
stressed in the resolution of the European Parliament of 9 July 2008 | stressed in the resolution of the European Parliament of 9 July 2008 | |||
on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system.<br/> | on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system. | |||
Similarly the Council of the European Union has underlined the | Similarly, the Council of the European Union has underlined the | |||
importance of cross-border access to national case law, as well as | importance of cross-border access to national case law, as well as | |||
the need for its standardisation, in view of an integrated access in | the need for its standardization, in view of an integrated access in | |||
a decentralized architecture. In this view the Working Party on Legal | a decentralized architecture. In this view, the Working Party on Legal | |||
Data Processing (e-Law) of the Council of the European Union formed a | Data Processing (e-Law) of the Council of the European Union formed a | |||
task group to study the possibilities for improving cross-border | task group to study the possibilities for improving cross-border | |||
access to national case law. Taking notice of the report of the | access to national case law. | |||
Working Party's task group, the Council of the EU decided in 2009 to | <!-- [rfced] FYI: We rephrased the following sentence to improve | |||
elaborate on a uniform, European system for the identification of | readability. Please review and let us know any concerns. | |||
case law (ECLI: European Case-Law Identifier) and uniform Dublin | ||||
Core-based set of metadata.</t> | Original: | |||
Taking notice of the report of the Working Party's task group, the | ||||
Council of the EU decided in 2009 to elaborate on a uniform, European system | ||||
for the identification of case law (ECLI: European Case-Law Identifier) and | ||||
uniform Dublin Core-based set of metadata. | ||||
Updated: | ||||
Taking notice of the report of the | ||||
Working Party's task group, in 2009, the Council of the European | ||||
Union decided to elaborate on a uniform European system for the | ||||
identification of case law (i.e., the European Case-Law Identifier | ||||
(ECLI)) and a uniform set of metadata based on the Dublin Core. | ||||
--> | ||||
Taking notice of the report of the | ||||
Working Party's task group, in 2009, the Council of the European Union decided t | ||||
o | ||||
elaborate on a uniform European system for the identification of | ||||
case law (i.e., the European Case-Law Identifier (ECLI)) and a uniform set of me | ||||
tadata based on the Dublin Core.</t> | ||||
<t>The Council of the European Union invited the Member States to | <t>The Council of the European Union invited the Member States to | |||
introduce in the legal information systems the European Legislation | introduce the European Legislation Identifier (ELI) in the legal | |||
Identifier (ELI), an http-based Semantic Web oriented identification | information systems, which is an http-based, Semantic Web-oriented | |||
system for European Union and Member States legislation.</t> | identification system for legislation of the European Union and Member S | |||
<t>The LEX identifier (also referred in this text as "LEX name") is | tates.</t> | |||
conceived to be general enough so as to provide guidance at the core | <!-- [rfced] May we update "legislative" to "legislation", "legislative | |||
of the standard and sufficient flexibility to cover a wide variety of | document", or something similar? | |||
needs for identifying all the legal documents of different nature, | ||||
namely legislative, case-law and administrative acts. Moreover, it | Original: | |||
The LEX identifier (also referred in this text as "LEX name") is | ||||
conceived to be general enough so as to provide guidance at the core | ||||
of the standard and sufficient flexibility to cover a wide variety of | ||||
needs for identifying all the legal documents of different nature, | ||||
namely legislative, case-law and administrative acts. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
The LEX identifier (also referred in this text as "LEX name") is | ||||
conceived to be general enough to provide guidance at the core | ||||
of the standard and offer sufficient flexibility to cover a wide variety of | ||||
needs for identifying legal documents of different types, | ||||
namely, legislation, case law, and administrative acts. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>The LEX identifier (also referred to in this text as "LEX name") is | ||||
conceived to be general enough to provide guidance at the core | ||||
of the standard and offer sufficient flexibility to cover a wide variety of | ||||
needs for identifying legal documents of different types, | ||||
namely, legislative, case law, and administrative acts. | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Is "items" the correct word choice here? Would "version" or | ||||
something else be better in this context? | ||||
Original: | ||||
Moreover, it can be effectively used within a federative environment | ||||
where different publishers (public and private) can provide their own items o | ||||
f | ||||
a legal document (that is there is more than one manifestation of the same | ||||
legal document). | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
Moreover, the LEX identifier can be effectively used within a | ||||
federative environment where different publishers (public and private) can | ||||
provide their own versions of a legal document (that is, if there is more tha | ||||
n | ||||
one version of the same legal document). | ||||
--> | ||||
Moreover, it | ||||
can be effectively used within a federative environment where | can be effectively used within a federative environment where | |||
different publishers (public and private) can provide their own items | different publishers (public and private) can provide their own items | |||
of a legal document (that is there is more than one manifestation of | of a legal document (that is, there is more than one manifestation of | |||
the same legal document).</t> | the same legal document).</t> | |||
<t>Specifications and syntax rules of LEX identifier can be used | <t>Specifications and syntax rules for the LEX identifier can also be us | |||
also for http-based naming convention to cope with | ed | |||
different requirements in legal information management, for example | for http-based naming conventions to cope with | |||
the need of having an identifier compliant with the Linked Open Data | different requirements in legal information management, for example, | |||
the need to have an identifier that is compliant with the Linked Open Data | ||||
principles.</t> | principles.</t> | |||
<t>This document supplements the required name syntax with a naming | <t>This document supplements the required name syntax with a naming | |||
convention that interprets all these recommendations into an original | convention that interprets all these recommendations into an original | |||
solution for sources of law identification.</t> | solution for sources of law identification.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="general-characteristics-of-the-system"> | <section anchor="general-characteristics-of-the-system"> | |||
<name>General Characteristics of the System</name> | <name>General Characteristics of the System</name> | |||
<t>The specifications in this document promote interoperability | <t>The specifications in this document promote interoperability | |||
among legal information systems by defining a namespace | among legal information systems by defining a namespace | |||
convention and structure that will create and manage identifiers for | convention and structure that will create and manage identifiers for | |||
legal documents. The identifiers are intended to be:</t> | legal documents. The identifiers are intended to have the following qualities:</ t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>globally unique</t> | <t>globally unique</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>transparent</t> | <t>transparent</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>reversible</t> | <t>reversible</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>persistent</t> | <t>persistent</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>location-independent, and</t> | <t>location-independent</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>language-neutral.</t> | <t>language-neutral</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>These qualities facilitate legal document management and | <t>These qualities facilitate management of legal documents and | |||
a mechanism of stable cross-collections and cross-country | a mechanism for stable cross-collection and cross-country | |||
references.</t> | references.</t> | |||
<t>Transparency means that given an act and its relevant metadata | <t>Transparency means that, for a given act and its relevant metadata | |||
(issuing authority, type of measure, etc.), it is possible to create | (issuing authority, type of measure, etc.), it is possible to create | |||
the related URN able to | a related URN that is able to | |||
uniquely identify the act in a way that is reversible | uniquely identify the act in a way that is reversible | |||
(from an act to its URN and from a | (from an act to its URN and from a | |||
URN to the act).</t> | URN to the act).</t> | |||
<t>Language-neutrality, in particular, is an important feature that | <t>Language neutrality, in particular, is an important feature that | |||
promotes adoption of the standard by organizations that must adhere to | promotes adoption of the standard by organizations that must adhere to | |||
official-language requirements. This specification provides | official language requirements. This specification provides | |||
guidance to both public and private groups that create, promulgate, | guidance to both public and private groups that create, promulgate, | |||
and publish legal documents. Registrants wish to minimize the | and publish legal documents. Registrants wish to minimize the | |||
potential for creating conflicting proprietary schemes, while | potential for creating conflicting proprietary schemes, while | |||
preserving sufficient flexibility to allow for diverse document types | preserving sufficient flexibility to allow for diverse document types | |||
and to respect the need for local control of collections by an | and to respect the need for local control of collections by an | |||
equally diverse assortment of administrative entities.</t> | equally diverse assortment of administrative entities.</t> | |||
<t>The challenge is to provide the right amount guidance at the | <t>The challenge is to provide the right amount guidance at the | |||
core of the specification while providing sufficient flexibility to | core of the specification while providing sufficient flexibility to | |||
cover a wide variety of needs. LEX does this by | cover a wide variety of needs. LEX does this by | |||
splitting the identifier into parts. The first part uses a | splitting the identifier into parts. The first part uses a | |||
pre-existing standard specification ("country/jurisdiction name | preexisting standard specification ("country/jurisdiction name | |||
standard") to indicate the country (or more generally the | standard") to indicate the country (or more generally, the | |||
jurisdiction) of origin for the legal document being identified; the | jurisdiction) of origin for the legal document being identified; the | |||
remainder ("local name") is intended for local use in identifying | remainder ("local name") is intended for local use in identifying | |||
documents issued in that country or jurisdiction.</t> | documents issued in that country or jurisdiction.</t> | |||
<t>The second part | <t>The second part depends only on the identification | |||
depends only on the sources of law identification system operating | system for sources of law operating in that nation, and it is mainly com | |||
in that nation and it is mainly composed by formalized information | posed by | |||
related to the enacting authority, the type of measure, the details | formalized information related to the enacting authority, the type of | |||
and possibly the annex.</t> | measure, the details, and possibly the annex.</t> | |||
<t>The identification system based on uniform names includes:</t> | <t>The identification system based on uniform names includes:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>a schema for assigning names capable of representing unambiguousl | <t>A schema for assigning names capable of unambiguously | |||
y | representing any addressed source of law (namely legislation, case | |||
any addressed source of law (namely legislation, case law and | law, and administrative acts) issued by any authority | |||
administrative acts), issued by any authority (intergovernmental, | (intergovernmental, supranational, national, regional, and local) | |||
supranational, national, regional and local) at any time (past, | at any time (past, present, and future).</t> | |||
present and future);</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>a resolution mechanism - in a distributed environment - that ties | <t>A resolution mechanism -- in a distributed environment -- that ti | |||
a | es a | |||
uniform name to the on-line location of the corresponding | uniform name to the online location of the corresponding | |||
resource(s).</t> | resource(s).</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>This document considers the first of these requirements. It also | <t>This document considers the first of these requirements. It also | |||
contains a few references to the architecture of the resolution | contains a few references to the architecture of the resolution | |||
service and to the corresponding software.</t> | service and to the corresponding software.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="linking-a-lex-name-to-a-document"> | <section anchor="linking-a-lex-name-to-a-document"> | |||
<name>Linking a LEX Name to a Document</name> | <name>Linking a LEX Name to a Document</name> | |||
<t>The LEX name is linked to the document through meta-information which | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Is "meta-information" correct here? Or should this be updated to | ||||
"metadata"? | ||||
Original: | ||||
The LEX name is linked to the document through meta-information which | ||||
may be specified as follows: | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
The LEX name is linked to the document through metadata, which | ||||
may be specified as follows: | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>The LEX name is linked to the document through meta-information, whic | ||||
h | ||||
may be specified as follows:</t> | may be specified as follows:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <!-- [rfced] FYI: We do not see "META" (all caps) in [W3C.HTML]. We have | |||
updated to "meta" (all lowercase). Please let us know any concerns. | ||||
Original: | ||||
* within the document itself through a specific element within an | ||||
XML schema or by an [W3C.HTML] META tag; | ||||
Updated: | ||||
* Within the document itself through a specific element within an | ||||
XML schema or by a meta tag [W3C.HTML]. | ||||
--> | ||||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>within the document itself through a specific element within | <t>Within the document itself through a specific element within | |||
an XML schema or by an <xref target="W3C.HTML"/> META tag;</t> | an XML schema or by a meta tag <xref target="W3C.HTML"/>.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>externally by means of a Resource Description Framework <xref tar get="W3C.rdf-schema"/> | <t>Externally by means of a Resource Description Framework <xref tar get="W3C.RDF-SCHEMA"/> | |||
triple, a specific attribute in a database, etc.</t> | triple, a specific attribute in a database, etc.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>At least one of these references is necessary to enable automated | <t>At least one of these references is necessary to enable automated | |||
construction and update of catalogues (distributed and centralized) | construction, an update of catalogues (distributed and centralized), | |||
and the implementation of resolvers that associate the uniform name | and the implementation of resolvers that associate the uniform name | |||
of a document with its physical location(s). LEX assumes no | of a document with its physical location. LEX assumes no | |||
particular relationship between the originator of the document, its | particular relationship between the originator of the document, its | |||
publisher, and the implementer of catalogues or resolution services.</t> | publisher, the implementer of catalogues, or resolution services.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="use-of-lex-names-in-references"> | <section anchor="use-of-lex-names-in-references"> | |||
<name>Use of LEX Names in References</name> | <name>Use of LEX Names in References</name> | |||
<t>LEX names can be used in references as an HREF attribute value of the | <t>LEX names can be used in references as an HREF attribute value of the | |||
hypertext link to the referred document. | hypertext link to the referred document. | |||
This link can be created in two ways:</t> | This link can be created in two ways:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>by manually inserting in the referring document the link with the | <t>Manually inserting the link with the | |||
uniform name: this is a burdensome procedure, especially for | uniform name in the referring document. This is a burdensome procedure, especial | |||
documents that are already on-line;</t> | ly for | |||
documents that are already online.</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>by automatically constructing (either permanently or temporarily) | <!-- [rfced] Please clarify "through reference parsers of a text". | |||
the link with the uniform name, through reference parsers of a | ||||
text: this is a more time-saving procedure even if subject to a | Original: | |||
* by automatically constructing (either permanently or temporarily) | ||||
the link with the uniform name, through reference parsers of a | ||||
text: this is a more time-saving procedure even if subject to a | ||||
certain percentage of errors, since references are not always | ||||
accurate or complete. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
* Automatically constructing (either permanently or temporarily) the | ||||
link with the uniform name from references in the text using a parser. | ||||
This procedure offers more time savings, even if it is subject to | ||||
a certain percentage of errors, since references are not always | ||||
accurate or complete. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>Automatically constructing (either permanently or temporarily) | ||||
the link with the uniform name through reference parsers of a | ||||
text. | ||||
This procedure offers more time savings, even if it is subject to a | ||||
certain percentage of errors, since references are not always | certain percentage of errors, since references are not always | |||
accurate or complete. This solution could nevertheless be | accurate or complete. Nevertheless, this solution could be | |||
acceptable for already published documents.</t> | acceptable for already-published documents.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>Whatever method is adopted, new documents produced | ||||
in whatever format (for example XML, XHTML, etc) | <t>No matter which method is adopted, new documents produced | |||
in a certain format (for example, XML, XHTML, etc.) | ||||
should express references through the uniform name | should express references through the uniform name | |||
of the document referred to.</t> | of the document referred to.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="definitions"> | <section anchor="definitions"> | |||
<name>Definitions</name> | <name>Definitions</name> | |||
<t>The following terms are used in | <t>The following terms are used in this document: | |||
these specifications:</t> | </t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <dt>Source of Law:</dt><dd> | |||
<t>Source of Law: | A general concept that refers to legislation, case | |||
a general concept to refer to legislation, case | law, regulations, and administrative acts. In its broadest sense, | |||
law, regulations and administrative acts. In its broadest sense, | ||||
the source of law is anything that can be conceived as the | the source of law is anything that can be conceived as the | |||
originator of 'erga omnes' legal rules. In this document "Source of | originator of 'erga omnes' legal rules. In this document, "source of | |||
Law" refers also to acts during their making such as bills that | law" also refers to acts during their creation, such as bills, that | |||
might or might not become laws;</t> | might or might not become laws.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>Jurisdictional Registrar:</dt><dd> | |||
<li> | An organization in any | |||
<t>Jurisdictional Registrar: | jurisdiction that shares and defines the assignment of the main components of th | |||
an organization that shares and defines in any | e resource | |||
jurisdiction the assignment of the main components of the resource | identifier through which the identifier uniqueness is guaranteed.</dd> | |||
identifier through which the identifier uniqueness is guaranteed.</t> | </dl> | |||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="terminology"> | <section anchor="terminology"> | |||
<name>Terminology</name> | <name>Terminology</name> | |||
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | <t> | |||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", | |||
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP | "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14> | |||
14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they a | ", | |||
ppear in all | "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", | |||
capitals, as shown here.</t> | "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", | |||
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to | ||||
be | ||||
interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref | ||||
target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as | ||||
shown here. | ||||
</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="syntax-used-in-this-document"> | <section anchor="syntax-used-in-this-document"> | |||
<name>Syntax Used in this Document</name> | <name>Syntax Used in This Document</name> | |||
<t>This document uses the syntax common to many Internet RFCs, which is | <t>This document uses a syntax that is based on the Augmented | |||
based on the ABNF (Augmented Backus-Naur Form) <xref target="RFC5234"/> meta- | Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) <xref target="RFC5234"/> meta-language, which | |||
language.</t> | is used in many RFCs.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="namespace-registration"> | <section anchor="namespace-registration"> | |||
<name>Namespace Registration</name> | <name>Namespace Registration</name> | |||
<t>The "lex" namespace has already been registered in the "Formal URN | <t>The "lex" namespace has been registered in the "Formal URN | |||
Namespaces" registry.</t> | Namespaces" registry. See <xref target="iana"/>.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="registration-of-lex"> | <section anchor="registration-of-lex"> | |||
<name>Registration of LEX</name> | <name>Registration of LEX</name> | |||
<section anchor="identifier-structure"> | <section anchor="identifier-structure"> | |||
<name>Identifier Structure</name> | <name>Identifier Structure</name> | |||
<t>The identifier has a hierarchical structure as follows:</t> | <t>The identifier has the following hierarchical structure:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
<sourcecode><![CDATA[ | ||||
"urn:lex:" NSS | "urn:lex:" NSS | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>where NSS is the Namespace Specific String composed as follows:</t> | <t>where NSS is the Namespace Specific String composed as follows:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
NSS = jurisdiction ":" local-name | NSS = jurisdiction ":" local-name | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>where:</t> | <t>where:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li> | <dl newline="false" spacing="normal"> | |||
<t>jurisdiction | <dt>jurisdiction:</dt><dd> | |||
identifies the scope (state, regional, | Identifies the scope (state, regional, | |||
municipal, supranational or of an organization) where a set of | municipal, supranational, or organizational) where a set of | |||
sources of law have validity. It is also possible to represent | sources of law have validity. It is also possible to represent | |||
international organizations (either states or public | international organizations (either states, public | |||
administrations or private entities);</t> | administrations, or private entities).</dd> | |||
</li> | ||||
<li> | <dt>local-name:</dt><dd>The uniform name of the source of law in the | |||
<t>local-name is the uniform name of the source of law in the | country or jurisdiction where it is issued; its internal structure | |||
country or jurisdiction where it is issued; its internal | is common to the already-adopted schemas. | |||
structure is common to the already adopted schemas. It | It | |||
represents all aspects of an intellectual production, | represents all aspects of an intellectual production, | |||
from its initial idea, through its | from its initial idea, through its | |||
evolution during the time, to its realisation by different | evolution during the time, to its realization by different | |||
means (paper, digital, etc.).</t> | means (paper, digital, etc.).</dd> | |||
</li> | </dl> | |||
</ul> | ||||
<t>The jurisdiction element is composed of two specific fields:</t> | <t>The jurisdiction element is composed of two specific fields:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
jurisdiction = jurisdiction-code *(";" jurisdiction-unit) | jurisdiction = jurisdiction-code *(";" jurisdiction-unit) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>where:</t> | <t>where:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li> | <dl newline="false" spacing="normal"> | |||
<t>jurisdiction-code is usually the identification code of the count | <dt>jurisdiction-code:</dt><dd><t>Usually the identification code of | |||
ry | the | |||
where the source of law is issued.<br/> | country where the source of law is issued. To facilitate the | |||
To facilitate the transparency of the name, the jurisdiction-code | transparency of the name, the jurisdiction-code usually follows | |||
follows usually the rules of identification of other Internet | the rules of identification of other Internet applications, based | |||
applications, based on domain name (for details and special cases see | on domain name (for details and special cases, see <xref | |||
<xref target="jur-cod-regist"/>).<br/> | target="jur-cod-regist"/>).</t> | |||
Due to the differences in representation in the various languages of a country, | <t>Due to the differences in representation in the various | |||
for an easier identification of the country the use the | languages of a country, the use of the standard <xref target="ISO.316 | |||
standard <xref target="ISO3166-1"/> is strongly RECOMMENDED.<br/> | 6-1"/> is | |||
Therefore a urn-lex ID always begins with a sequence of ASCII characters: | strongly <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> for easier identification | |||
"urn:lex:ccTLD". For all the other components that follow the jurisdiction-code, | of the country. Therefore, a urn-lex ID always begins with a | |||
the Jurisdictional Registrar decides the mode of representation (ASCII or | sequence of ASCII characters: "urn:lex:ccTLD". For all the other | |||
UTF-8 %-encoding) (see <xref target="non-ascii-char"/>).<br/> | components that follow the jurisdiction-code, the Jurisdictional | |||
Where applicable, the domain name of the | Registrar decides the mode of representation (ASCII or UTF-8 | |||
country or multinational or international organisation is used.<br/> | percent-encoding; see <xref target="non-ascii-char"/>).</t> | |||
If such information is not available for a particular institution, a | <t>Where applicable, the domain name of the country or multinational or | |||
specific code will be defined (see <xref target="jur-cod-regist"/>). | international organization is used. If such information is not available for | |||
Examples reported in this document are hypothetical and assume that | a particular institution, a specific code will be defined (see <xref | |||
the corresponding domain name is used for the jurisdiction-code.</t> | target="jur-cod-regist"/>). Examples reported in this document are | |||
</li> | hypothetical and assume that the corresponding domain name is used for the | |||
<li> | jurisdiction-code.</t> | |||
<t>jurisdiction-unit are the possible administrative hierarchical | </dd> | |||
sub-structures defined by each country or organisation within their | <!-- [rfced] Would it be helpful to rephrase this sentence as follows? | |||
specific legal system. This additional information can be used in | ||||
case two or more levels of legislative or judicial production exist | Original: | |||
(e.g., federal, state and municipality level) and the same bodies may | Therefore acts of | |||
be present in each jurisdiction. Therefore acts of the same type | the same type issued by similar authorities in different areas | |||
differ for the jurisdiction-unit specification. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
Therefore, the jurisdiction-unit differs for acts of | ||||
the same type issued by similar authorities in different areas. | ||||
--> | ||||
<dt>jurisdiction-unit</dt><dd><t>The possible administrative hierarchi | ||||
cal | ||||
sub-structures defined by each country or organization within their | ||||
specific legal system. | ||||
This additional information can be used when two or more levels of legislative o | ||||
r judicial production exist | ||||
(e.g., federal, state, and municipality level) and the same bodies may | ||||
be present in each jurisdiction. Therefore, acts of the same type | ||||
issued by similar authorities in different areas differ for the | issued by similar authorities in different areas differ for the | |||
jurisdiction-unit specification.<br/> | jurisdiction-unit specification.</t> | |||
An example can be the following:<br/> | <t>The following is an example:</t> | |||
"br:governo:decreto" (decree of federal government),<br/> | ||||
"br;sao.paulo:governo:decreto" (decree of SU+00E3o Paulo state) <br/> | <artwork> | |||
"br;sao.paulo;campinas:governo:decreto" (decree of Campinas <br/> | "br:governo:decreto" (decree of federal government) | |||
municipality).</t> | "br;sao.paulo:governo:decreto" (decree of SU+00E3o Paulo state) | |||
</li> | "br;sao.paulo;campinas:governo:decreto" (decree of Campinas | |||
</ul> | municipality)</artwork> | |||
<t>Fictitious examples of sources of law identifiers are:</t> | </dd> | |||
</dl> | ||||
<t>The following are fictitious examples of sources of law identifiers:< | ||||
/t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2003-09-21;456 | urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2003-09-21;456 | |||
(Italian act) | (Italian act) | |||
urn:lex:fr:etat:loi:2004-12-06;321 | urn:lex:fr:etat:loi:2004-12-06;321 | |||
(French act) | (French act) | |||
urn:lex:es:estado:ley:2002-07-12;123 | urn:lex:es:estado:ley:2002-07-12;123 | |||
(Spanish act) | (Spanish act) | |||
urn:lex:ch;glarus:regiere:erlass:2007-10-15;963 | urn:lex:ch;glarus:regiere:erlass:2007-10-15;963 | |||
(Glarus Swiss Canton decree) | (Glarus Swiss Canton decree) | |||
urn:lex:eu:commission:directive:2010-03-09;2010-19-EU | urn:lex:eu:commission:directive:2010-03-09;2010-19-EU | |||
(EU Commission Directive) | (EU Commission Directive) | |||
urn:lex:us:supreme.court:decision:1978-04-28;77-5953 | urn:lex:us:supreme.court:decision:1978-04-28;77-5953 | |||
(US SC decision: Riley vs Illinois) | (US SC decision: Riley vs Illinois) | |||
urn:lex:be:conseil.etat:decision:2008-07-09;185.273 | urn:lex:be:conseil.etat:decision:2008-07-09;185.273 | |||
(Decision of the Belgian Council of State) | (Decision of the Belgian Council of State) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="jur-cod-regist"> | <section anchor="jur-cod-regist"> | |||
<name>Jurisdiction-code Register</name> | <name>Jurisdiction-Code Register</name> | |||
<t>A new jurisdiction-code registry has been created. Each entry | ||||
contains the following elements:</t> | <!-- [rfced] We have a few questions about the text below. | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li> | Original: | |||
<t>jurisdiction-code: the identifier of jurisdiction, assigned | 2.2. Jurisdiction-code Register | |||
to the country or organisation;</t> | ||||
</li> | A new jurisdiction-code registry has been created. Each entry | |||
<li> | contains the following elements: | |||
<t>jurisdiction: the official name of the jurisdiction, | ||||
country or organisation;</t> | a) Should the title read "Jurisdiction-Code Registry" ("Registry" rather than | |||
</li> | "Register")? | |||
<li> | ||||
<t>registrant: essential information to identify the organization | b) Is "jurisdiction-code" the name of the registry? If so, we will enclose in | |||
quotation marks. | ||||
c) Would it be helpful to include a citation or URL so readers can access the | ||||
new jurisdiction-code registry? | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>A new jurisdiction-code registry has been created. Note that this | ||||
is a CNR registry and <strong>not</strong> an IANA registry.</t> | ||||
<t>Each | ||||
entry contains the following elements:</t> | ||||
<dl spacing="normal"> | ||||
<dt>jurisdiction-code:</dt><dd>The identifier of jurisdiction assign | ||||
ed | ||||
to the country or organization.</dd> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] How may we update these definitions for clarity? | ||||
a) jurisdiction-code definition | ||||
Original: | ||||
* jurisdiction-code: the identifier of jurisdiction, assigned to the | ||||
country or organisation; | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
jurisdiction-code: The identifier assigned to the jurisdiction (i.e., identi | ||||
fier | ||||
assigned to the country or organization). | ||||
b) jurisdiction definition | ||||
Original: | ||||
* jurisdiction: the official name of the jurisdiction, country or | ||||
organisation; | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
jurisdiction: The official name of the jurisdiction (i.e., the country or | ||||
organization). | ||||
Or: | ||||
jurisdiction: The official name of the country or | ||||
organization. | ||||
--> | ||||
<dt>jurisdiction:</dt><dd>The official name of the jurisdiction, | ||||
country or organization.</dd> | ||||
<dt>registrant:</dt><dd>Essential information that identifies the or | ||||
ganization | ||||
that requested the registration of the code. The registrant will | that requested the registration of the code. The registrant will | |||
be responsible for its DNS zone and for the attribution of sub-zone | be responsible for its DNS zone, the attribution of sub-zone | |||
delegations, and so on. It is RECOMMENDED that each jurisdiction | delegations, and so on. It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that each jurisdiction | |||
create a registry of all delegated levels so that the organization | create a registry of all delegated levels so that the organization | |||
responsible of each sub-zone can easily be identified;</t> | responsible for each sub-zone can easily be identified.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>reference:</dt><dd>A reference to the defining document (if any) | |||
<li> | .</dd> | |||
<t>reference: a reference to the defining document (if any).</t> | </dl> | |||
</li> | <t>The registry is initially empty. The following are possible example e | |||
</ul> | ntries:</t> | |||
<t>The table is initially empty. Possible example entries are:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
"br"; "Brazil"; "Prodasen, Federal Senate, address, contact"; | "br"; "Brazil"; "Prodasen, Federal Senate, address, contact"; | |||
\[reference\] | \[reference\] | |||
"eu"; "European Union"; "DG Digit, European Commission, address, | "eu"; "European Union"; "DG Digit, European Commission, address, | |||
contact"; \[reference\] | contact"; \[reference\] | |||
"un.org"; "United Nations"; "DPI, United Nations, address, | "un.org"; "United Nations"; "DPI, United Nations, address, | |||
contact"; \[reference\] | contact"; \[reference\] | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>Note that this is a CNR registry and <strong>not</strong> an IANA reg istry.</t> | ||||
<t>CNR is responsible for the | <t>CNR is responsible for the | |||
jurisdiction-code and the root lex-nameserver.nic.it registries of the resolutio n | jurisdiction-code and the root lex-nameserver.nic.it registries of the resolutio n | |||
routing.</t> | routing.</t> | |||
<t>A new Jurisdictional Registrar will contact CNR or the Designated | ||||
Expert(s) according to the established rules of governance (published | <!-- [rfced] Would including either a URL or a citation with a corresponding | |||
in the CNR website dedicated to the LEX governance). The application | reference entry for "CNR website dedicated to the LEX governance" be | |||
helpful to readers here? If so, please provide the necessary information. | ||||
Original: | ||||
A new Jurisdictional Registrar will contact CNR or the Designated | ||||
Expert(s) according to the established rules of governance (published | ||||
in the CNR website dedicated to the LEX governance). | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>A new Jurisdictional Registrar will contact CNR or the designated | ||||
expert(s) according to the established rules of governance (published | ||||
on the CNR website dedicated to LEX governance). The application | ||||
will be evaluated according to the Jurisdictional Registrar | will be evaluated according to the Jurisdictional Registrar | |||
authoritativeness and the offered guarantees. The Designated | authoritativeness and the offered guarantees. The designated | |||
Expert(s) will evaluate such applications, with a similar approach as | expert(s) will evaluate such applications with a similar approach as | |||
of the DNS. Typically such applications should come from public | evaluations of the DNS. Typically, such applications should come from public | |||
administrations, as authorities enacting sources of law.</t> | administrations, as authorities enacting sources of law.</t> | |||
<t>The adopted registration policy is similar to that of the "Expert Rev iew" | <t>The adopted registration policy is similar to that of the "Expert Rev iew" | |||
as specified in <xref target="RFC8126"/>. Designated Experts will assign | policy specified in <xref target="RFC8126"/>. The designated expert(s) will assi gn | |||
jurisdiction codes based on the following principles:</t> | jurisdiction codes based on the following principles:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>If a request comes from a jurisdiction that corresponds to a | <t>If a request comes from a jurisdiction that corresponds to a | |||
country and the jurisdiction code is the same as a top level ccTLD, | country and the jurisdiction code is the same as a top-level Country Code Top-Le | |||
then the top level ccTLD should be | vel Domain (ccTLD), | |||
used as the jurisdiction code;</t> | then the top-level ccTLD should be | |||
used as the jurisdiction code.</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>If a request comes from a jurisdiction that corresponds to a | <t>If a request comes from a jurisdiction that corresponds to a | |||
multi-national (e.g., European Union) or international (e.g., United | multi-national organization (e.g., European Union) or international | |||
Nations, World Trade Organization) organizations the Top Level | organization (e.g., | |||
Domain Name (e.g., "eu") or the Domain Name (e.g., "un.org", | United Nations and World Trade Organization), the | |||
"wto.org") of the organization should be used as the jurisdiction | Top-Level Domain Name (e.g., "eu") or the Domain Name (e.g., | |||
code;</t> | "un.org" and "wto.org") of the organization should be used as the | |||
jurisdiction code.</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>in case when such multi-national or international organization do | <t>If a multi-national or international organization does | |||
es | not have a registered domain, the designated expert(s) should assign | |||
not have a registered domain, Designated Expert(s) should assign | something like "name.lex.arpa", where the name will be the | |||
something like name.lex.arpa, where name will be the | acronym of the organization name in the language chosen by the organization itse | |||
acronym of the organization name, in the language chosen by the organization its | lf. | |||
elf. | ||||
For example, the jurisdiction code of the European Economic Community | For example, the jurisdiction code of the European Economic Community | |||
could be "eec.lex.arpa". | could be "eec.lex.arpa". The alias mechanism allows for acronyms in different la | |||
Anyway the alias mechanism allows to have acronyms in different languages.</t> | nguages.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>Jurisdiction codes MUST NOT be renamed, because that | ||||
would violate rules that URN assignments are persistent.</t> | <t>Jurisdiction codes <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be renamed, because that | |||
<t>Jurisdiction codes MUST NOT ever be deleted. They can only be marked | would violate the rule that URN assignments be persistent.</t> | |||
as | <t>Jurisdiction codes <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> ever be deleted. They can | |||
"obsolete", i.e. closed for new assignments within the jurisdiction. | only be marked as | |||
"obsolete", i.e., closed for new assignments within the jurisdiction. | ||||
Requests to obsolete a jurisdiction code are also processed by | Requests to obsolete a jurisdiction code are also processed by | |||
Designated Expert(s).</t> | the designated expert(s).</t> | |||
<t>Designated Expert(s) can unilaterally initiate allocation or | <t>Designated expert(s) can unilaterally initiate allocation or | |||
obsolescence of a jurisdiction code.</t> | obsolescence of a jurisdiction code.</t> | |||
<t>Request for new jurisdiction code assignment must include | <t>Requests for new jurisdiction code assignments must include | |||
the organization or country requesting it and Contact information (email) | the organization or country requesting it and contact information (email) | |||
of who requested the assignment.</t> | of who requested the assignment.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="conformance-with-urn-syntax"> | <section anchor="conformance-with-urn-syntax"> | |||
<name>Conformance with URN Syntax</name> | <name>Conformance with URN Syntax</name> | |||
<t>The "lex" namespace identifier (NID) syntax conforms to | <t>The "lex" namespace identifier (NID) syntax conforms to | |||
<xref target="RFC8141"/>. However, a series of characters are reserved to identi fy | <xref target="RFC8141"/>. However, a series of characters are reserved for ident ifying | |||
elements or sub-elements, or for future extensions of the LEX naming | elements or sub-elements, or for future extensions of the LEX naming | |||
convention (see <xref target="res-chars"/>).</t> | convention (see <xref target="res-chars"/>).</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="validation-mechanism"> | <section anchor="validation-mechanism"> | |||
<name>Validation Mechanism</name> | <name>Validation Mechanism</name> | |||
<t>The Jurisdictional Registrar (or those it delegates) of each adhering | <t>The Jurisdictional Registrar (or those it delegates) of each adhering | |||
country or organization is responsible for the definition or | country or organization is responsible for the definition or | |||
acceptance of the uniform name's primary elements (issuing authority | acceptance of the uniform name's primary elements (issuing authority | |||
and type of legal measure).</t> | and type of legal measure).</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="scope"> | <section anchor="scope"> | |||
<name>Scope</name> | <name>Scope</name> | |||
<t>Global interest. In fact each body that enacts sources of law can | <!-- [rfced] How may we update "global interest" to form a complete sentence? | |||
identify them by this scheme. Furthermore, other bodies (even not | If the suggestion below does not accurately capture your intended | |||
enacting sources of law, such as newspaper or magazine publishers, | meaning, please feel free to provide updated text. | |||
etc.) aiming to refer legal documents, can unequivocally identify | ||||
them by this scheme.</t> | Original: | |||
Global interest. In fact each body that enacts sources of law can | ||||
identify them by this scheme. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
The scope is global. In fact, each body that enacts | ||||
sources of law can identify them by this scheme. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>Global interest. In fact, each body that enacts sources of law can | ||||
identify them by this scheme. Furthermore, other bodies (even non-enact | ||||
ing sources of law, such as newspapers, magazine publishers, etc.) that aim to r | ||||
eference legal documents can unequivocally identify them | ||||
by this scheme.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="general-syntax-and-features-of-the-lex-identifier"> | <section anchor="general-syntax-and-features-of-the-lex-identifier"> | |||
<name>General Syntax and Features of the LEX Identifier</name> | <name>General Syntax and Features of the LEX Identifier</name> | |||
<t>This section lists the general features applicable to all | <t>This section lists the general features applicable to all | |||
jurisdictions.</t> | jurisdictions.</t> | |||
<section anchor="allowed-and-not-allowed-characters"> | <section anchor="allowed-and-not-allowed-characters"> | |||
<name>Allowed and Not Allowed Characters</name> | <name>Allowed and Not Allowed Characters</name> | |||
<t>These characters are defined in accordance with the <xref target="RFC | <t>The characters are defined in accordance with <xref target="RFC8141"/ | |||
8141"/> | >. | |||
"Uniform Resource Names (URNs)". For various reasons, later | For various reasons that are | |||
explained, in the "lex" NSS only a subset of characters is | explained later, only a subset of characters is | |||
allowed. All other characters are either eliminated or converted.</t> | allowed in the "lex" NSS. All other characters are either eliminated or converte | |||
d.</t> | ||||
<t>For the full syntax of the uniform names in the "lex" space, please | <t>For the full syntax of the uniform names in the "lex" space, please | |||
see <xref target="urn-lex-syn"/>.</t> | see <xref target="urn-lex-syn"/>.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="res-chars"> | <section anchor="res-chars"> | |||
<name>Reserved Characters</name> | <name>Reserved Characters</name> | |||
<t>The following characters are reserved in the specific "lex" | <t>The following characters are reserved in the specific "lex" | |||
namespace:</t> | namespace:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <dl indent="6"> | |||
"@" separator of the expression, that contains information on | <dt>"@"</dt><dd>Separator of the expression that contains information on | |||
version and language; | version and language.</dd> | |||
"$" separator of the manifestation, that contains information on | <dt>"$"</dt><dd>Separator of the manifestation that contains information on | |||
format, editor, etc.; | format, editor, etc.</dd> | |||
":" separator of the main elements of the name at any entity; | <dt>":"</dt><dd>Separator of the main elements of the name at any entity.</dd> | |||
";" separator of level. It identifies the introduction of an element | <dt>";"</dt><dd>Separator of the level. It identifies the introduction of an ele | |||
at a hierarchically lower level, or the introduction of a | ment | |||
specification; | at a hierarchically lower level or the introduction of a | |||
"+" separator of the repetitions of an entire main element (e.g., | specification.</dd> | |||
multiple authorities); | <dt>"+"</dt><dd>Separator of the repetitions of an entire main element (e.g., | |||
"|" separator between different formats of the same element (e.g., | multiple authorities).</dd> | |||
date); | <dt>"|"</dt><dd>Separator between different formats of the same element (e.g., | |||
"," separator of the repetitions of individual components in the main | date).</dd> | |||
<dt>","</dt><dd>Separator of the repetitions of individual components in the mai | ||||
n | ||||
elements, each bearing the same level of specificity (e.g., | elements, each bearing the same level of specificity (e.g., | |||
multiple numbers); | multiple numbers).</dd> | |||
"~" separator of the partition identifier in references (e.g., | <dt>"~"</dt><dd>Separator of the partition identifier in references (e.g., | |||
paragraph of an article); | paragraph of an article).</dd> | |||
"*" and "!" are reserved for future expansions. | <dt>"*"</dt><dd>Reserved for future expansions.</dd> | |||
]]></artwork> | <dt>"!"</dt><dd>Reserved for future expansions.</dd> | |||
</dl> | ||||
<t>To keep backward compatibility with existing applications in some | <t>To keep backward compatibility with existing applications in some | |||
jurisdictions, the "lex" NID syntax does not include the use of the | jurisdictions, the "lex" NID syntax does not include the use of the | |||
character "/" in this version.<br/> | character "/" in this version. This character is always converted into | |||
This character is always converted into | ||||
"-", except in the formal annexes (see <xref target="annex-formal"/>).</t> | "-", except in the formal annexes (see <xref target="annex-formal"/>).</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="case-sensitivity"> | <section anchor="case-sensitivity"> | |||
<name>Case Sensitivity</name> | <name>Case Sensitivity</name> | |||
<t>For all the languages where different cases (upper or lower cases) | <t>For all the languages where different cases (uppercase or lowercase) | |||
or different spelling of the same word are possible, | or different spellings of the same word are possible, names belonging | |||
names belonging to "lex" namespace are case-insensitive. | to "lex" namespace are case-insensitive. For the Latin alphabet, it is | |||
It is RECOMMENDED that, in latin alphabet, they be created in lower case, but na | <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that names be created in | |||
mes that differ | lower case, but names that differ only in case or in the spelling of | |||
only in case, or in the spelling, of the same word | the same word <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be considered equivalent | |||
MUST be considered to be equivalent<br/> | (e.g., "Ministry" will be recorded as "ministry").</t> | |||
(e.g., "Ministry" will be recorded as "ministry").</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="non-ascii-char"> | <section anchor="non-ascii-char"> | |||
<name>Unicode Characters outside the ASCII Range</name> | <name>Unicode Characters Outside the ASCII Range</name> | |||
<t>In order to exploit DNS as a routing tool towards the proper | ||||
resolution system, to keep editing and communication more simple and | <t>In order to exploit the DNS as a routing tool towards the proper | |||
to avoid character percent-encoding, it is RECOMMENDED that the characters outsi | resolution system, keep editing and communication more simple, and avoid charact | |||
de the ASCII range | er percent-encoding, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that characters outside th | |||
(e.g. national characters, diacritic signs, ...) are turned into base ASCII | e ASCII range | |||
characters (e.g., the Italian term "sanitU+00E0" replaced into | (e.g., national characters, diacritic signs, etc.) be replaced by base ASCII | |||
"sanita", the French term "ministU+00E8re" replaced into | characters. For example, the Italian term "sanitU+00E0" can be replaced by | |||
"ministere"), in case by transliteration (e.g. "MU+00FCnchen" | "sanita", the French term "ministU+00E8re" can be replaced by | |||
replaced into "muenchen").</t> | "ministere", and "MU+00FCnchen" | |||
can be replaced by "muenchen" (transliteration).</t> | ||||
<t>This mapping consists of:</t> | <t>This mapping consists of:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>transcription from non-Latin alphabets;</t> | <t>Transcription from non-Latin alphabets</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>transliteration of some signs (diaeresis, eszett, ...);</t> | <t>Transliteration of some signs (e.g., diaeresis and eszett)</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>preservation of the only basic characters, eliminating the signs | <t>Preservation of only the basic characters, eliminating the signs | |||
placed above (accents, tilde, ...), below (cedilla, little tail, | placed above (e.g., accents and tilde), below (e.g., cedilla and little tail), o | |||
...) or on (oblique cut, ...).</t> | r on (e.g., oblique cut)</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>The most suitable, well-known and widespread mapping system for a giv | <!-- [rfced] We are having trouble understanding "or, in agreement with this | |||
en language MUST be chosen by the | one". Please clarify. | |||
jurisdiction, or, in agreement with this one, by the jurisdiction-unit in | ||||
case of different languages in the various regions, | Original: | |||
also taking into account the choices made for the same language by other jurisdi | The most suitable, well-known and widespread mapping system for a | |||
ctions.<br/> | given language MUST be chosen by the jurisdiction, or, in agreement | |||
Certainly this mapping is simpler and more feasible for languages that | with this one, by the jurisdiction-unit in case of different | |||
use the Latin alphabet and gradually becomes more complex both for | languages in the various regions, also taking into account the | |||
other alphabets and for writing systems with opposite orientation | choices made for the same language by other jurisdictions. | |||
(from right to left) or based on ideographic symbols.</t> | ||||
<t>If this conversion is not acceptable by a specific jurisdiction or it | Perhaps: | |||
is | The most suitable, well-known, and widespread mapping system for a | |||
not available in a given language, UNICODE MUST be used and, for accessing | given language MUST be chosen by the jurisdiction or | |||
network protocols, any UNICODE code points outside the ASCII range MUST be | by the jurisdiction-unit (in agreement with the jurisdiction) in the case of | |||
converted in UTF-8 %-encoding according to <xref target="RFC3986"/> and <xref ta | different | |||
rget="RFC3629"/>.<br/> | languages in various regions, also taking into account the | |||
In this case it should be noted that the generated URN (as some | choices made for the same language by other jurisdictions. | |||
of its parts) cannot be used directly for routing through DNS, and | --> | |||
therefore the jurisdiction must adopt one of the following | <t>The most suitable, well-known, and widespread mapping system for a given lang | |||
strategies:</t> | uage <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be chosen by the | |||
jurisdiction, or in agreement with this one, by the jurisdiction-unit in | ||||
case of different languages in various regions, | ||||
also taking into account the choices made for the same language by other jurisdi | ||||
ctions. | ||||
This mapping is simpler and more feasible for languages that | ||||
use the Latin alphabet and gradually becomes more complex for | ||||
other alphabets and for writing systems that use opposite orientation | ||||
(from right to left) or are based on ideographic symbols.</t> | ||||
<t>If this conversion is not acceptable by a specific jurisdiction or | ||||
it is not available in a given language, Unicode <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> | ||||
be used, and for accessing network protocols, any Unicode code points | ||||
outside the ASCII range <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be converted to UTF-8 | ||||
percent-encoding according to <xref target="RFC3986"/> and <xref | ||||
target="RFC3629"/> .</t> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Should "as" be updated to "and" in "as some of its parts"? | ||||
Original: | ||||
In this case it should be noted that the generated URN (as some of | ||||
its parts) cannot be used directly for routing through DNS, and | ||||
therefore the jurisdiction must adopt one of the following | ||||
strategies: | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
In this case, it should be noted that the generated URN (and some of | ||||
its parts) cannot be used directly for routing through the DNS. | ||||
Therefore, the jurisdiction must adopt one of the following | ||||
strategies: | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>In this case, it should be noted that the | ||||
generated URN (as some of its parts) cannot be used directly for | ||||
routing through the DNS. Therefore, the jurisdiction must adopt one of | ||||
the following strategies:</t> | ||||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>to convert non-ASCII characters within the DNS into the IDN | <t>Convert non-ASCII characters within the DNS into IDN | |||
encoding, using the <xref target="RFC5894"/> punycode translation (e.g. | encoding using Punycode translation <xref target="RFC5894"/> (e.g., | |||
mU+00FCnchen in xn--mnchen-3ya), and to develop a | mU+00FCnchen in xn--mnchen-3ya) and develop a | |||
software interface that converts the URN before the navigation in DNS, or</t> | software interface that converts the URN before the navigation in the DNS.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>to create a routing service relying on a software, out of DNS, | <t>Create a routing service relying on a software, outside of the DN | |||
addressing a proper resolution service.</t> | S, | |||
that addresses a proper resolution service.</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>Note that the urn:lex ID, could contain groups of characters (UTF-8 % | <t>Note that the urn:lex ID could contain groups of characters (UTF-8 pe | |||
-encoded) | rcent-encoded) | |||
of some languages with different orientations: in this case the BiDi rules apply | of some languages with different orientations. In this case, the BiDi rules appl | |||
<xref target="RFC5893"/>.</t> | y <xref target="RFC5893"/>.</t> | |||
<t>Summarizing, the preference order is the following:</t> | <t>The preferred order is summarized as follows:</t> | |||
<!-- [rfced] Please clarify the text starting with "(for not having...". | ||||
Original: | ||||
* Conversion into basic ASCII, RECOMMENDED solution (for not having | ||||
to make conversions for network protocols and DNS); | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
* Conversion into basic ASCII is the RECOMMENDED solution (because | ||||
conversions for network protocols and the DNS are not needed). | ||||
--> | ||||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>Conversion into basic ASCII, RECOMMENDED solution (for not having | <t>Conversion into basic ASCII is the <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> sol | |||
to make conversions | ution (for not having to make conversions | |||
for network protocols and DNS);</t> | for network protocols and the DNS).</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>Using UNICODE, and convert into UTF-8 %-encoding <xref target="RF | <t>Using Unicode and converting to UTF-8 percent-encoding <xref targ | |||
C3629"/>, for accessing network protocols, | et="RFC3629"/> for accessing network protocols | |||
and to punycode <xref target="RFC5894"/>, only for navigation in DNS, via softwa | and to Punycode <xref target="RFC5894"/> only for navigation in DNS via software | |||
re interface;</t> | interface.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>Creation of a routing service relying on a software, out of DNS, | <t>Creation of a routing service relying on a software outside of DN | |||
addressing a proper resolution service.</t> | S | |||
and addressing a proper resolution service.</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>The first solution allows native DNS routing, while the other two | <t>The first solution allows native DNS routing while the other two | |||
require software development for the interface or the routing. | solutions require software development for the interface or the routing. | |||
However it is up to the specific jurisdiction to choose the preferred | However, it is up to the specific jurisdiction to choose the preferred | |||
solution.</t> | solution.</t> | |||
<t>Two examples (Latin and Cyrillic alphabet) relating to the different | <t>The following are two examples (Latin and Cyrillic alphabets) relatin | |||
solutions adopted are here reported:</t> | g to the different | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | solutions adopted:</t> | |||
a circular adopted by the Municipality of Munich (Rundschreiben der | ||||
Stadt MU+00FCnchen): | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
- ascii = urn:lex:de:stadt.munchen:rundschreiben:... | ||||
- unicode = urn:lex:de:stadt.mU+00FCnchen:rundschreiben:... | <li><t>A circular adopted by the Municipality of Munich (Rundschreiben der | |||
- utf-8 = urn:lex:de:stadt.m%xC3%xBCnchen:rundschreiben:... | Stadt MU+00FCnchen):</t> | |||
- punycode = urn:lex:de:stadt.xn--mnchen-3ya:rundschreiben:... | ||||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li><t>ASCII:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:de:stadt.munchen:rundschreiben: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | </li> | |||
a state law of the Russian Federation (latin: gosudarstvo zakon; | ||||
cyrillic: U+0441U+043EU+0441U+0442U+043EU+044FU+043DU+0438U+0435 | ||||
U+0437U+0430U+043AU+043EU+043D): | ||||
- ascii = urn:lex:ru:gosudarstvo:zakon:... | ||||
- unicode = urn:lex:ru:U+0441U+043EU+0441U+0442U+043EU+044FU+043D | ||||
U+0438U+0435:U+0437U+0430U+043AU+043EU+043D:... | ||||
- utf-8 = urn:lex:ru:%xD1%x81%xD0%xBE%xD1%x81%xD1%x82%xD0%xBE%xD1 | ||||
%x8F%xD0%xBD%xD0%xB8%xD0%xB5:%xD0%xB7%xD0%xB0%xD0%xBA | ||||
%xD0%xBE%xD0%xBD:... | ||||
- punycode = urn:lex:ru:xn--80aebe3cdmfdkg:xn--80ankme:... | ||||
assuming that the Russia jurisdiction-code is expressed | <li><t>Unicode:</t> | |||
in ASCII ("ru"), | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
while the Cyrillic version ("U+0440U+0444") has the | urn:lex:de:stadt.mU+00FCnchen:rundschreiben: ... | |||
puny-code "xn--p1ai". | ]]></artwork> | |||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>UTF-8:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:de:stadt.m%xC3%xBCnchen:rundschreiben: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>Punycode:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:de:stadt.xn--mnchen-3ya:rundschreiben: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>A state law of the Russian Federation (Latin: gosudarstvo zakon; | ||||
Cyrillic: U+0441U+043EU+0441U+0442U+043EU+044FU+043DU+0438U+0435 | ||||
U+0437U+0430U+043AU+043EU+043D):</t> | ||||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li><t>ASCII:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:ru:gosudarstvo:zakon: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>Unicode:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:ru:U+0441U+043EU+0441U+0442U+043EU+044FU+043D | ||||
U+0438U+0435:U+0437U+0430U+043AU+043EU+043D: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>UTF-8:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:ru:%xD1%x81%xD0%xBE%xD1%x81%xD1%x82%xD0%xBE%xD1 | ||||
%x8F%xD0%xBD%xD0%xB8%xD0%xB5:%xD0%xB7%xD0%xB0%xD0%xBA | ||||
%xD0%xBE%xD0%xBD: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>Punycode:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:ru:xn--80aebe3cdmfdkg:xn--80ankme: ... | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
<aside><t>Note: The above assumes that the Russia jurisdiction-code is | ||||
expressed in ASCII ("ru"), while the Cyrillic version ("U+0440U+0444") has the | ||||
Punycode "xn--p1ai".</t> | ||||
</aside> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="abbreviations"> | <section anchor="abbreviations"> | |||
<name>Abbreviations</name> | <name>Abbreviations</name> | |||
<t>Abbreviations are often used in law for indicating institutions (e.g. | <t>Abbreviations are often used in law for indicating institutions (e.g. | |||
Min.), structures (e.g. Dept.), or legal measures (e.g. Reg.) but not | , | |||
in a uniform way, therefore their expansion is highly RECOMMENDED<br/> | Min.), structures (e.g., Dept.), or legal measures (e.g., Reg.), but they are no | |||
(e.g., "Min." is reported as "ministry").</t> | t | |||
used in a uniform way. Therefore, their expansion is highly <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</ | ||||
bcp14> | ||||
(e.g., "Min." is expanded as "ministry").</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="dat-form"> | <section anchor="dat-form"> | |||
<name>Date Format</name> | <name>Date Format</name> | |||
<t>The <xref target="ISO.8601.1988"/> is the international format for re | <t><xref target="ISO.8601.1988"/> describes the international format for | |||
presenting dates: | representing dates. Dates <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> always be represented in this for | |||
therefore dates MUST always be represented in this format (4 digits for the year | mat (4 digits for the year, | |||
, | 2 digits for the month, and 2 digits for the day):</t> | |||
2 digits for the month, 2 digits for the day):</t> | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
date-iso = yyyy-mm-dd | date-iso = yyyy-mm-dd | |||
]]></sourcecode> | ||||
<t>For example, "September 2, 99" will be written as "1999-09-02".</t> | ||||
<t>This format ensures interoperability between different | ||||
representation systems, and there are several programs for mapping | ||||
other formats to this one.</t> | ||||
<t>However, to facilitate reading and understanding | ||||
other formats (e.g., Jewish calendar), the urn:lex scheme allows | ||||
for the date to be added in the jurisdiction's own format. For example, | ||||
the | ||||
date in the previous example would be 21.Elul,5759, that is:</t> | ||||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li><t>In Hebrew characters:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
U+05DBU+05F4U+05D0.U+05D0U+05B1U+05DCU+05D5U+05BCU+05DC.U+05EA | ||||
U+05E9U+05E0U+05F4U+05D8 | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>(e.g., "September 2, 99" will be written as "1999-09-02").</t> | </li> | |||
<t>This format ensures interoperability between different representation | <li><t>In UTF-8:</t> | |||
systems and | ||||
there are several programs for mapping other formats to this one.<br/> | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
However, to make reading and understanding such other formats (e.g. Jewish calen | %x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x42%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x46%x34%x5c%x75%x30%x35 | |||
dar), | %x44%x30%x2e%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x30%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x42%x31%x5c | |||
the urn:lex scheme provides that the date can be added in the jurisdiction's own | %x75%x30%x35%x44%x43%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x35%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x42 | |||
format<br/> | %x43%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x43%x2e%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x45%x41%x5c%x75 | |||
(e.g. the date in the previous example would be 21.Elul,5759, that is:</t> | %x30%x35%x45%x39%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x45%x30%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x46%x34 | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | %x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x38 | |||
- in Hebrew characters: | ||||
"U+05DBU+05F4U+05D0.U+05D0U+05B1U+05DCU+05D5U+05BCU+05DC.U+05EA | ||||
U+05E9U+05E0U+05F4U+05D8"; | ||||
- in UTF-8 code: | ||||
"%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x42%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x46%x34%x5c%x75%x30%x35 | ||||
%x44%x30%x2e%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x30%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x42%x31%x5c | ||||
%x75%x30%x35%x44%x43%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x35%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x42 | ||||
%x43%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x43%x2e%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x45%x41%x5c%x75 | ||||
%x30%x35%x45%x39%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x45%x30%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x46%x34 | ||||
%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x38"). | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
<t>Therefore, for all the dates in the urn:lex identifier | <t>Therefore, for all the dates in the urn:lex identifier | |||
(see <xref target="det-elem"/> and <xref target="ide-vers"/>), | (see Sections <xref target="det-elem" format="counter"/> and <xref target="ide-v | |||
it is also possible to indicate the one in the local format:</t> | ers" format="counter"/>), | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | it is possible to indicate the date in the local format:</t> | |||
<sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | ||||
date = date-iso [ "|" date-loc ] | date = date-iso [ "|" date-loc ] | |||
]]></sourcecode> | ||||
<t>For example, "September 2, 99" will be written in ISO format and Hebr | ||||
ew format as follows:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
1999-09-02|U+05DBU+05F4U+05D0.U+05D0U+05B1U+05DCU+05D5U+05BCU+05DC. | ||||
U+05EAU+05E9U+05E0U+05F4U+05D8 | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>(e.g., "September 2, 99" will be written in ISO plus Hebrew format as | <t>The characters that are not allowed (e.g., "/") or reserved (e.g., ", | |||
<br/> | ") cannot exist | |||
"1999-09-02|U+05DBU+05F4U+05D0.U+05D0U+05B1U+05DCU+05D5U+05BCU+05DC. | inside the date-loc and therefore <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be turned into ".".</t> | |||
U+05EAU+05E9U+05E0U+05F4U+05D8").</t> | ||||
<t>The characters which are not allowed (e.g. "/") or which are reserved | ||||
(e.g. ",") cannot exist | ||||
inside the date-loc and therefore MUST be turned into ".".</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="specific-syntax-and-features-of-the-lex-identifier"> | <section anchor="specific-syntax-and-features-of-the-lex-identifier"> | |||
<name>Specific Syntax and Features of the LEX Identifier</name> | <name>Specific Syntax and Features of the LEX Identifier</name> | |||
<t>In this section there are other features related to specific | <t> This section discusses features related to specific | |||
jurisdictions and the implementation of which is RECOMMENDED.</t> | jurisdictions. The implementation of these features is | |||
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>.</t> | ||||
<section anchor="spaces-connectives-and-punctuation-marks"> | <section anchor="spaces-connectives-and-punctuation-marks"> | |||
<name>Spaces, Connectives and Punctuation Marks</name> | <name>Spaces, Connectives, and Punctuation Marks</name> | |||
<t>All the language connectives (e.g., articles, prepositions, etc.), | <t>When explicitly present, all language connectives (e.g., articles, pr | |||
the punctuation marks and all the special characters (as apostrophes, | epositions, etc.), punctuation marks, and special characters (e.g., apostrophes, | |||
dashes, etc.), when explicitly present, are eliminated (no | dashes, etc.) are eliminated (no | |||
transformation occurs in cases of languages with declensions or | transformation occurs in cases of languages with declensions or | |||
agglutinating languages). The words left are connected to each other | agglutinating languages). The words that are left are connected to | |||
by a dot (".") which substitutes the "space".<br/> | each other by a dot ("."), which substitutes for the space (e.g., | |||
(e.g., "Ministry of Finances, Budget and of Economic Planning" | "Ministry of Finances, Budget, and Economic Planning" becomes | |||
becomes "ministry.finances.budget.economic.planning";<br/> | "ministry.finances.budget.economic.planning" and "Ministerstvo Finansov" | |||
"Ministerstvo Finansov" becomes "ministerstvo.finansov")</t> | becomes "ministerstvo.finansov").</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="acronyms"> | <section anchor="acronyms"> | |||
<name>Acronyms</name> | <name>Acronyms</name> | |||
<t>The use of acronyms might be confusing and encourage ambiguity in | <t>The use of acronyms might be confusing and encourage ambiguity in | |||
uniform names (the same acronym may indicate two different | uniform names (the same acronym may indicate two different | |||
institutions or structures), therefore their expansion is highly | institutions or structures); therefore, their expansion is highly | |||
RECOMMENDED<br/> | <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> | |||
(e.g., "FAO" is expanded as "food.agriculture.organization").</t> | (e.g., "FAO" is expanded as "food.agriculture.organization").</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="ordinal-numbers"> | <section anchor="ordinal-numbers"> | |||
<name>Ordinal Numbers</name> | <name>Ordinal Numbers</name> | |||
<t>To even the representation, it is highly RECOMMENDED that any ordinal | ||||
number included in a component of a document name (e.g., in the | <!-- [rfced] Will readers understand what "To even the representation" means? | |||
Original: | ||||
To even the representation, it is highly RECOMMENDED that any ordinal | ||||
number included in a component of a document name (e.g., in the | ||||
description of an institution body) is indicated in Western Arabic | ||||
numerals, regardless to the original expression: whether in Roman | ||||
numerals, or with an adjective, or in Arabic numeral with apex, etc. | ||||
(IV, third, 1U+00B0, 2^, etc.) | ||||
(e.g., "Department IV" becomes "department.4"). | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
To make the representation consistent, it is highly RECOMMENDED that any ordi | ||||
nal | ||||
number included in a component of a document name (e.g., in the | ||||
description of an institution body) is indicated in Western Arabic | ||||
numerals, regardless the original expression, whether Roman | ||||
numerals, an adjective, Arabic numerals with an apex, etc. | ||||
(such as IV, third, 1U+00B0, and 2^). For example, "Department IV" | ||||
becomes "department.4". | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>To even the representation, it is highly <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> t | ||||
hat any ordinal | ||||
number included in a component of a document name (e.g., in the | ||||
description of an institution body) is indicated in Western Arabic | description of an institution body) is indicated in Western Arabic | |||
numerals, regardless to the original expression: whether in Roman | numerals, regardless to the original expression, whether Roman | |||
numerals, or with an adjective, or in Arabic numeral with apex, etc. | numerals, an adjective, Arabic numerals with an apex, etc. | |||
(IV, third, 1U+00B0, 2^, etc.)<br/> | (such as IV, third, 1U+00B0, and 2^). For example, "Department IV" becomes "depa | |||
(e.g., "Department IV" becomes "department.4").</t> | rtment.4".</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="creation"> | <section anchor="creation"> | |||
<name>Creation of the Source of Law LEX Identifier - Baseline structure</n ame> | <name>Creation of the Source of Law LEX Identifier: Baseline Structure</na me> | |||
<section anchor="basic-principles"> | <section anchor="basic-principles"> | |||
<name>Basic Principles</name> | <name>Basic Principles</name> | |||
<t>The uniform name must identify one and only one document (more | <t>The uniform name must identify one and only one document (more | |||
precisely a "bibliographic resource" <xref target="ISBD"/>, see also <xref targe t="src-law"/>) | precisely a "bibliographic resource" <xref target="ISBD"/>; see also <xref targe t="src-law"/>) | |||
and is created in such a way that it is:</t> | and is created in such a way that it is:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>self-explanatory;</t> | <t>self-explanatory,</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>identifiable through simple and clear rules;</t> | <t>identifiable through simple and clear rules,</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>compatible with the practice commonly used for references;</t> | <t>compatible with the practice commonly used for references,</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>able to be created from references in the text, automatically (by | <t>able to be created from references in the text, automatically (by | |||
parser) or manually;</t> | parser) or manually, and</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>representative of both the formal and the substantive aspects of | <t>representative of both the formal and the substantive aspects of | |||
the document.</t> | the document.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="src-law"> | <section anchor="src-law"> | |||
<name>Model of Sources of Law Representation</name> | <name>Model of Sources of Law Representation</name> | |||
<t>According to the <xref target="FRBR"/> (Functional Requirements for B | <t>According to the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records | |||
ibliographic | (FRBR) <xref target="FRBR"/> model developed by IFLA (International | |||
Records) model developed by IFLA (International Federation of Library | Federation of Library Associations and Institutions), four | |||
Associations and Institutions), in a source of law, as in any | fundamental entities (or aspects) can be specified in a source of law, | |||
intellectual production, four fundamental entities (or aspects) can be | as in any intellectual production.</t> | |||
specified.</t> | ||||
<t>The first two entities reflect its contents:</t> | <t>The first two entities reflect its contents:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | ||||
<t>work: identifies a distinct intellectual creation; in our case, i | <!-- [rfced] Please review "our case" here. Is the intent "in this document", | |||
t | "in LEX", or something else? | |||
Original: | ||||
* work: identifies a distinct intellectual creation; in our case, it | ||||
identifies a source of law both in its original form as amended | ||||
over time; | ||||
* expression: identifies a specific intellectual realisation of a | ||||
work; in our case it identifies every different (original or up- | ||||
to-date) version of the source of law over time and/or language in | ||||
which the text is expressed. | ||||
... | ||||
* manifestation: identifies a physical embodiment of an expression | ||||
of a work; in our case it identifies embodiments in different | ||||
media (printing, digital, etc.), encoding formats (XML, PDF, | ||||
etc.), or other publishing characteristics; | ||||
* item: identifies a specific copy of a manifestation; in our case | ||||
it identifies individual physical copies as they are found in | ||||
particular physical locations. | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Please clarify the text starting with "both...". | ||||
Original: | ||||
work: identifies a distinct intellectual creation; in our case, it | ||||
identifies a source of law both in its original form as amended | ||||
over time; | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
work: Identifies a distinct intellectual creation; in our case, it | ||||
identifies a source of law in both its original form and its amended | ||||
form over time. | ||||
--> | ||||
<dt>work:</dt><dd>Identifies a distinct intellectual creation; in ou | ||||
r case, it | ||||
identifies a source of law both in its original form | identifies a source of law both in its original form | |||
as amended over time;</t> | as amended over time.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>expression:</dt><dd>Identifies a specific intellectual realizati | |||
<li> | on of a | |||
<t>expression: identifies a specific intellectual realisation of a | work; in our case, it identifies every different (original or | |||
work; in our case it identifies every different (original or | ||||
up-to-date) version of the source of law over time and/or language in | up-to-date) version of the source of law over time and/or language in | |||
which the text is expressed.</t> | which the text is expressed.</dd> | |||
</li> | </dl> | |||
</ul> | ||||
<t>The other two entities relate to its form:</t> | <t>The other two entities relate to its form:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <dt>manifestation:</dt><dd>Identifies a physical embodiment of an ex | |||
<t>manifestation: identifies a physical embodiment of an expression | pression of a work; | |||
of a work; | in our case, it identifies embodiments in different media | |||
in our case it identifies embodiments in different media | ||||
(printing, digital, etc.), encoding formats (XML, PDF, etc.), | (printing, digital, etc.), encoding formats (XML, PDF, etc.), | |||
or other publishing characteristics;</t> | or other publishing characteristics.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>item:</dt><dd>Identifies a specific copy of a manifestation; in | |||
<li> | our case, it | |||
<t>item: identifies a specific copy of a manifestation; in our case | ||||
it | ||||
identifies individual physical copies as they are found in | identifies individual physical copies as they are found in | |||
particular physical locations.</t> | particular physical locations.</dd> | |||
</li> | </dl> | |||
</ul> | <t>In this document, the <xref target="FRBR"/> model has been interprete | |||
<t>In this document the <xref target="FRBR"/> model has been interpreted | d for the | |||
for the | ||||
specific characteristics of the legal domain. In particular, apart | specific characteristics of the legal domain. In particular, apart | |||
from the language that does produce a specific expression, the | from the language that does produce a specific expression, the | |||
discriminative criterion between expression and manifestation is | discriminative criterion between expression and manifestation is | |||
based on the difference of the juridical effects that a variation can | based on the difference of the juridical effects that a variation can | |||
provide with respect to the involved actors (citizens, parties, | provide with respect to the involved actors (citizens, parties, | |||
institutions). In this scenario the main characteristic of the | and institutions). In this scenario, the main characteristic of the | |||
expression of an act is represented by its validity over the time, | expression of an act is represented by its validity over the time | |||
during which it provides the same juridical effects. These effects may | during which it provides the same juridical effects. These effects may | |||
change as a result of amendments or annulments of other legislative or | change as a result of amendments or annulments of other legislative or | |||
jurisprudential acts. Therefore notes, summarizations, comments, | jurisprudential acts. Therefore, notes, summaries, comments, | |||
anonymizations and other editorial activities over the same text do | anonymizations, and other editorial activities over the same text do | |||
not produce different expressions, but different manifestations.</t> | not produce different expressions. Instead, they produce different manifestation | |||
s.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="the-structure-of-the-local-name"> | <section anchor="the-structure-of-the-local-name"> | |||
<name>The Structure of the Local Name</name> | <name>Structure of the Local Name</name> | |||
<t>The local-name within the "lex" namespace MUST contain all the | <t>The local-name within the "lex" namespace <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain | |||
all the | ||||
necessary pieces of information enabling the unequivocal | necessary pieces of information enabling the unequivocal | |||
identification of a legal document. If the local-name violates | identification of a legal document. If the local-name violates | |||
this requirement, the related URN is not a valid one within the "lex" | this requirement, the related URN is not a valid one within the "lex" | |||
namespace.</t> | namespace.</t> | |||
<t>In the legal domain, at "work" level, three components are always | <t>In the legal domain, three components are always | |||
present: the enacting authority, the type of provision and the | present at the "work" level: the enacting authority, the type of provision, and | |||
details. A fourth component, the annex, can be added if any. | the | |||
details. A fourth component, the annex, can also be added. | ||||
It is often necessary to differentiate various expressions, that is:</t> | It is often necessary to differentiate various expressions, that is:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the original version and all the amended versions of the same | <t>the original version and all the amended versions of the same | |||
document;</t> | document, and</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the versions of the text expressed in the different official | <t>the versions of the text expressed in the different official | |||
languages of the state or organization.</t> | languages of the state or organization.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>Finally the uniform name allows a distinction among diverse | <t>Finally, the uniform name allows a distinction among diverse | |||
manifestations, which may be produced by multiple publishers using | manifestations that may be produced by multiple publishers using | |||
different means and formats.</t> | different means and formats.</t> | |||
<t>In every case, the basic identifier of the source of law (work) | <t>In every case, the basic identifier of the source of law (work) | |||
remains the same, but information is added regarding the specific | remains the same, but information is added regarding the specific | |||
version under consideration (expression); similarly a suffix is added | version under consideration (expression). Similarly, a suffix is added | |||
to the expression for representing the characteristics of the | to the expression for representing the characteristics of the | |||
publication (manifestation).</t> | publication (manifestation).</t> | |||
<t>Information that forms a source of law uniform name at each level | <t>Information that forms a uniform name for a source of law at each lev | |||
(work, expression, manifestation) is expressed in the official | el | |||
language of the relevant jurisdiction; in case of multiple official | (work, expression, and manifestation) is expressed in the official | |||
language of the relevant jurisdiction. More language-dependent names (aliases) a | ||||
re | ||||
created in cases where there are multiple official | ||||
languages (as in Switzerland) or more involved jurisdictions (as in | languages (as in Switzerland) or more involved jurisdictions (as in | |||
international treaties), more language-dependent names (aliases) are | international treaties).</t> | |||
created.</t> | ||||
<t>Therefore, the more general structure of the local name appears as | <t>Therefore, the more general structure of the local name appears as | |||
follows:</t> | follows:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
local-name = work ["@" expression] ["$" manifestation] | local-name = work ["@" expression] ["$" manifestation] | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>However, consistent with legislative practice, the uniform name of | <t>However, consistent with legislative practice, the uniform name of | |||
the main original provision (work) becomes the identifier of an | the main original provision (work) becomes the identifier of an | |||
entire class of documents which includes: the original main document, | entire class of documents that includes the following: the original main documen | |||
the annexes, and all their versions, languages and formats | t, | |||
subsequently generated.</t> | the annexes, and all the versions, languages, and formats | |||
that are subsequently generated.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="structure-of-the-document-identifier-at-work-level"> | <section anchor="structure-of-the-document-identifier-at-work-level"> | |||
<name>Structure of the Document Identifier at "Work" Level</name> | <name>Structure of the Document Identifier at "Work" Level</name> | |||
<!-- [rfced] The first sentence below mentions "the type of provision" as one | ||||
of the components, but the ABNF uses "measure". Please review and let us | ||||
know if any updates are needed. | ||||
Original: | ||||
In the legal domain, at "work" level, three components are always | ||||
present: the enacting authority, the type of provision and the | ||||
details. A fourth component, the annex, can be added if any. | ||||
... | ||||
work = authority ":" measure ":" details *(":" annex) | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>The structure of the document identifier is comprised of the four | <t>The structure of the document identifier is comprised of the four | |||
fundamental elements mentioned above, distinguished one from | fundamental elements mentioned above, distinguished one from | |||
the other, ordered by increasingly narrow | the other and ordered by increasingly narrow | |||
domains and competencies:</t> | domains and competencies:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
work = authority ":" measure ":" details *(":" annex) | work = authority ":" measure ":" details *(":" annex) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>where:</t> | <t>where:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | ||||
<li> | <dl newline="false" spacing="normal"> | |||
<t>authority is the issuing or proposing authority of the measure | <dt>authority:</dt><dd>The issuing or proposing authority of the mea | |||
(e.g., State, Ministry, Municipality, Court, etc.);</t> | sure | |||
</li> | (e.g., state, ministry, municipality, court, etc.).</dd> | |||
<li> | ||||
<t>measure is the type of the measure, both public nature (e.g., | <dt>measure:</dt><dd>The type of the measure, both public (e.g., | |||
constitution, act, treaty, regulation, decree, decision, etc.) as | constitution, act, treaty, regulation, decree, decision, etc.) and | |||
well as private one (e.g., license, agreement, etc);</t> | private (e.g., license, agreement, etc.).</dd> | |||
</li> | ||||
<li> | <dt>details:</dt><dd>The terms associated with the measure, typicall | |||
<t>details are the terms associated to the measure, typically the da | y the date | |||
te | ||||
(usually the signature date) and the number included in the heading | (usually the signature date) and the number included in the heading | |||
of the act;</t> | of the act.</dd> | |||
</li> | ||||
<li> | <dt>annex:</dt><dd>The identifier of the annex, if any (e.g., Annex | |||
<t>annex is the identifier of the annex, if any (e.g., Annex 1).</t> | 1).</dd> | |||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | </dl> | |||
<t>In case of annexes, both the main document and its annexes have their | <!-- [rfced] May we update "identifier of the annex adds a suffix" and | |||
own uniform name so that they can individually be referenced; the | "identifier of an annex of an annex adds an ending" as follows in these | |||
sentences to improve clarity? | ||||
Original: | ||||
In case of annexes, both the main document and its annexes have their | ||||
own uniform name so that they can individually be referenced; the | ||||
identifier of the annex adds a suffix to that of the main document. | ||||
In similar way the identifier of an annex of an annex adds an ending | ||||
to that of the annex which it is attached to. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
Both the main document and its annexes have their own uniform names | ||||
so that they can be referenced individually; the identifier of an | ||||
annex consists of a suffix added to the identifier of the main document. | ||||
In similar way, the | ||||
identifier of an annex to another annex consists of another suffix added to t | ||||
he | ||||
identifier of the previous annex. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>Both the main document and its annexes have their | ||||
own uniform names so that they can be referenced individually; the | ||||
identifier of the annex adds a suffix to that of the main document. | identifier of the annex adds a suffix to that of the main document. | |||
In similar way the identifier of an annex of an annex adds an ending | In a similar way, the identifier of an annex of an annex adds an ending | |||
to that of the annex which it is attached to.</t> | to that of the annex that it is attached to. | |||
</t> | ||||
<t>The main elements of the work name are generally divided into several | <t>The main elements of the work name are generally divided into several | |||
elementary components, and for each component, specific rules of | elementary components, and for each component, specific rules of | |||
representation are established (criteria, modalities, syntax and | representation are established (criteria, modalities, syntax, and | |||
order). | order). | |||
For the details regarding each element, please see the <xref target="syn-work"/> | For the details regarding each element, see <xref target="syn-work"/>. | |||
. | The following are hypothetical examples of work identifiers:</t> | |||
Examples (hypothetical) of work identifiers are:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2006-05-14;22 | urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2006-05-14;22 | |||
urn:lex:uk:ministry.justice:decree:1999-10-07;45 | urn:lex:uk:ministry.justice:decree:1999-10-07;45 | |||
urn:lex:ch;glarus:regiere:erlass:2007-10-15;963 | urn:lex:ch;glarus:regiere:erlass:2007-10-15;963 | |||
urn:lex:es:tribunal.supremo:decision:2001-09-28;68 | urn:lex:es:tribunal.supremo:decision:2001-09-28;68 | |||
urn:lex:fr:assemblee.nationale:proposition.loi:13.legislature;1762 | urn:lex:fr:assemblee.nationale:proposition.loi:13.legislature;1762 | |||
urn:lex:br:estado:constituicao:1988-10-05;lex-1 | urn:lex:br:estado:constituicao:1988-10-05;lex-1 | |||
urn:lex:un.org:united.nations;general.assembly:resolution: | urn:lex:un.org:united.nations;general.assembly:resolution: | |||
1961-11-28;a-res-1661 | 1961-11-28;a-res-1661 | |||
urn:lex:nl:hoge.raad:besluit:2008-04-01;bc8581 | urn:lex:nl:hoge.raad:besluit:2008-04-01;bc8581 | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>The type of measure is important to identify | <t>The type of measure is important to identify | |||
case law, as well as legislation, especially within the legal systems | case law and legislation, especially within legal systems | |||
where cases are identified traditionally only through the year of | where cases are traditionally identified only through the year of | |||
release and a number. Since the aim of the lex schema is to | release and a number. Since the aim of the lex schema is to | |||
identify specific materials, the type of measure or the full date are | identify specific materials, the type of measure or the full date are | |||
able to differentiate between materials belonging to a | able to differentiate between materials belonging to a | |||
specific case.</t> | specific case.</t> | |||
<t>Here below is an example where the type of measure or the full date | <t>The following is an example where the type of measure or the full dat e | |||
are essential for identify specific materials of a case:</t> | are essential for identify specific materials of a case:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
- 4/59 Judgment of the EEC Court of Justice 04/04/1960, Mannesmann | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
AG and others / ECSC High Authority | ||||
<li><t>4/59 Judgment of the EEC Court of Justice 04/04/1960, Mannesmann AG and o | ||||
thers / ECSC High Authority</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:eec.lex.arpa:court.justice:judgement:1960-04-04;4-59 | urn:lex:eec.lex.arpa:court.justice:judgement:1960-04-04;4-59 | |||
- 4/59 Order of the EEC Court of Justice 18/05/1960, Mannesmann AG | ]]></artwork> | |||
and others / ECSC High Authority | </li> | |||
<li><t>4/59 Order of the EEC Court of Justice 18/05/1960, Mannesmann AG and othe | ||||
rs / ECSC High Authority</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:eec.lex.arpa:court.justice:order:1960-05-18;4-59 | urn:lex:eec.lex.arpa:court.justice:order:1960-05-18;4-59 | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="aliases"> | <section anchor="aliases"> | |||
<name>Aliases</name> | <name>Aliases</name> | |||
<t>International treaties involve multiple signatory jurisdictions, | <t>International treaties involve multiple signatory jurisdictions | |||
and are therefore represented through multiple identifiers, each of them related | and are therefore represented through multiple identifiers, each of them related | |||
to a signatory. For example, a bilateral France and | to a signatory. For example, a bilateral France and | |||
Germany treaty is identified through two URNs (aliases) belonging to | Germany treaty is identified through two URNs (aliases) belonging to | |||
either "fr" or "de" jurisdiction<br/> | either the "fr" or "de" jurisdiction | |||
(e.g., "urn:lex:fr:etat:traite:..." and "urn:lex:de:staat:vertrag:..." | (e.g., "urn:lex:fr:etat:traite:..." and "urn:lex:de:staat:vertrag:..." | |||
since it pertains to both the French and the German jurisdiction).</t> | since it pertains to both the French and German jurisdictions).</t> | |||
<t>In the states or organisations that have multiple official | <t>In the states or organizations that have multiple official | |||
languages, a document has multiple identifiers, each of them expressed in | languages, a document has multiple identifiers. Each identifier is expressed in | |||
a different official language, basically a set of equivalent aliases. | a different official language and is basically a set of equivalent aliases. | |||
This system permits manual or automated construction of the uniform | This system permits manual or automated construction of the uniform | |||
name of the referred source of law in the same language used in the | name of the referred source of law in the same language used in the | |||
document itself<br/> | document itself | |||
(e.g., "urn:lex:eu:council:directive:2004-12-07;31", | (e.g., "urn:lex:eu:council:directive:2004-12-07;31" and | |||
"urn:lex:eu:consiglio:direttiva:2004-12-07;31", etc.).</t> | "urn:lex:eu:consiglio:direttiva:2004-12-07;31").</t> | |||
<t>Moreover, a document can be assigned more than one uniform name in | <t>Moreover, a document can be assigned more than one uniform name in | |||
order to facilitate its linking from other documents. This option can | order to facilitate its linking from other documents. This option can | |||
be used for documents that, although unique, are commonly referenced | be used for documents that, although unique, are commonly referenced | |||
from different perspectives. For example, the form of a document's | from different perspectives, for example, the form of a document's | |||
promulgation and its specific content (e.g., a Regulation promulgated | promulgation and its specific content (e.g., a Regulation promulgated | |||
through a Decree of the President of the Republic).</t> | through a Decree of the President of the Republic).</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="structure-of-the-document-identifier-at-expression-level" > | <section anchor="structure-of-the-document-identifier-at-expression-level" > | |||
<name>Structure of the Document Identifier at "Expression" Level</name> | <name>Structure of the Document Identifier at "Expression" Level</name> | |||
<t>There may be several expressions of a legal text, connected to | <t>There may be several expressions of a legal text connected to | |||
specific versions or languages.</t> | specific versions or languages.</t> | |||
<t>Each version is characterized by the period of time during which that | <t>Each version is characterized by the period of time during which that | |||
text is to be considered to be in force or effective. | text is to be considered to be in force or effective. | |||
The lifetime of a version ends with the issuing of the subsequent | The lifetime of a version ends with the issuing of the subsequent | |||
version. New versions of a text may be brought into existence by:</t> | version. New versions of a text may be brought into existence by:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>amendments due to the issuing of other legal | <t>amendments due to the issuing of other legal | |||
acts and to the subsequent production of updated or consolidated | acts and to the subsequent production of updated or consolidated | |||
texts;</t> | texts,</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>correction of publication errors (rectification or errata corrige );</t> | <t>correction of publication errors (rectification or errata corrige ), and</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>entry into or departure from a particular time span, depending on | <t>entry into or departure from a particular time span, depending on | |||
the specific date in which different partitions of a text come into | the specific date in which different partitions of a text come into | |||
force.</t> | force.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>Each such version may be expressed in more than one language, | <t>Each version may be expressed in more than one language, | |||
with each language-version having its own specific identifier. | with each language version having its own specific identifier. | |||
The identifier of a source of law expression adds such information to | The identifier of a source of law expression adds such information to | |||
the work identifier, using the following main structure:</t> | the work identifier using the following main structure:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
expression = version [":" language] | expression = version [":" language] | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>where:</t> | <t>where:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl newline="false" spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <dt>version:</dt><dd>The identifier of the version of the original o | |||
<t>version is the identifier of the version of the original or | r | |||
amended source of law. In general it is expressed by the | amended source of law. In general, it is expressed by the | |||
promulgation date of the amending act; other specific | promulgation date of the amending act; other specific | |||
information can be used for particular documents. If necessary, the | information can be used for particular documents. If necessary, the | |||
original version is specified by the string "original", expressed in | original version is specified by the string "original" and is expressed in | |||
the language of the act or version (for the details regarding this | the language of the act or version (for the details regarding this | |||
element, please see the <xref target="syn-ver"/>);</t> | element, please see <xref target="syn-ver"/>).</dd> | |||
</li> | ||||
<li> | <dt>language:</dt><dd>The identification code of the language in whi | |||
<t>language is the identification code of the language in which the | ch the | |||
document is expressed, according to <xref target="RFC5646"/> (it=Italian, fr=Fre nch, | document is expressed, according to <xref target="RFC5646"/> (it=Italian, fr=Fre nch, | |||
de=German, etc.). The granularity level of the language (for example | de=German, etc.). The granularity level of the language (for example, | |||
the specification of the German language as used in Switzerland | the specification of the German language as used in Switzerland | |||
rather than the standard German) is left to each specific | rather than standard German) is left to each specific | |||
jurisdiction. The information is not necessary when the text is | jurisdiction. The information is not necessary when the text is | |||
expressed in the sole official language of the country or | expressed in the sole official language of the country or | |||
jurisdiction.</t> | jurisdiction.</dd> | |||
</li> | </dl> | |||
</ul> | <t>The following are hypothetical examples of document identifiers for e | |||
<t>Hypothetical examples of document identifiers for expressions are:</t | xpressions:</t> | |||
> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
urn:lex:ch:etat:loi:2006-05-14;22@originel:fr | urn:lex:ch:etat:loi:2006-05-14;22@originel:fr | |||
(original version in French) | (original version in French) | |||
urn:lex:ch:staat:gesetz:2006-05-14;22@original:de | urn:lex:ch:staat:gesetz:2006-05-14;22@original:de | |||
(original version in German) | (original version in German) | |||
urn:lex:ch:etat:loi:2006-05-14;22@2008-03-12:fr | urn:lex:ch:etat:loi:2006-05-14;22@2008-03-12:fr | |||
(amended version in French) | (amended version in French) | |||
urn:lex:ch:staat:gesetz:2006-05-14;22@2008-03-12:de | urn:lex:ch:staat:gesetz:2006-05-14;22@2008-03-12:de | |||
(amended version in German) | (amended version in German) | |||
urn:lex:be:conseil.etat:decision:2008-07-09;185.273@originel:fr | urn:lex:be:conseil.etat:decision:2008-07-09;185.273@originel:fr | |||
(original version in French of a Belgian decision) | (original version in French of a Belgian decision) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="struct-manif"> | <section anchor="struct-manif"> | |||
<name>Structure of the Document Identifier at "Manifestation" Level</nam e> | <name>Structure of the Document Identifier at "Manifestation" Level</nam e> | |||
<t>To identify a specific manifestation, the uniform name of the | <t>To identify a specific manifestation, the uniform name of the | |||
expression is followed by a suitable suffix containing the following | expression is followed by a suitable suffix containing the following | |||
main elements:</t> | main elements:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <!-- [rfced] We updated "its Internet domain name" to "the publisher's | |||
<t>editor: editorial staff who produced it, expressed according to | Internet domain name" for clarity. Please let us know if this is | |||
its Internet domain name. Since publishers' domain names may vary | incorrect. | |||
Original: | ||||
* editor: editorial staff who produced it, expressed according to | ||||
its Internet domain name. | ||||
Updated: | ||||
* editor: Editorial staff who produced it, expressed according to | ||||
the publisher's Internet domain name. | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Will readers know who "them" is in the phrase "for each of them a | ||||
new manifestation with the new domain name"? | ||||
Original: | ||||
In this case, in order to make its materials accessible, the | ||||
publisher will have to create for each of them a new manifestation | ||||
with the new domain name; | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
In this case, in order to make its materials accessible, the | ||||
publisher will have to create a new manifestation with a new domain name | ||||
for each object. | ||||
Or: | ||||
In this case, in order to make its materials accessible, the | ||||
publisher will have to create a new manifestation with a new domain name | ||||
for each object that is not accessible. | ||||
--> | ||||
<dt>editor:</dt><dd>Editorial staff who produced it, expressed accor | ||||
ding to | ||||
the publisher's Internet domain name. Since publishers' domain names may vary | ||||
over time, manifestations already assigned by a publisher remain | over time, manifestations already assigned by a publisher remain | |||
unchanged even if the identified object is no longer accessible. In | unchanged, even if the identified object is no longer accessible. In | |||
this case, in order to make its materials accessible, the publisher | this case, in order to make its materials accessible, the publisher | |||
will have to create for each of them a new manifestation with the | will have to create a new manifestation with a | |||
new domain name;</t> | new domain name for each of them.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>format:</dt><dd>The digital format (e.g., XML, HTML, PDF, etc.) | |||
<li> | expressed | |||
<t>format: the digital format (e.g., XML, HTML, PDF, etc.) expressed | ||||
according to the MIME Content-Type standard <xref target="RFC2045"/>, where the | according to the MIME Content-Type standard <xref target="RFC2045"/>, where the | |||
"/" character is to be substituted by the "-" sign;</t> | "/" character is to be substituted with the "-" sign.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>component:</dt><dd>Possible components of the expressions | |||
<li> | contained in the manifestation. Such components are expressed by | |||
<t>component: possible components of the expressions contained in | language-dependent labels representing the whole document (in | |||
the manifestation. Such components are expressed by language- | English "all"), the main part of the document (in English "body"), | |||
dependent labels representing the whole document (in English "all") | or the caption label of the component itself (e.g., Table 1, | |||
or the main part of the document (in English "body") or the caption | Figure 2, etc.).</dd> | |||
label of the component itself (e.g. Table 1, Figure 2, etc.);</t> | <dt>feature:</dt><dd>Other features of the document (e.g., anonymize | |||
</li> | d | |||
<li> | decision text).</dd> | |||
<t>feature: other features of the document (e.g., anonymized | </dl> | |||
decision text).</t> | <t>Thus, the manifestation suffix reads:</t> | |||
</li> | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
</ul> | ||||
<t>The manifestation suffix thus reads:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
manifestation = editor ":" format | manifestation = editor ":" format | |||
[":" component [":" feature]] | [":" component [":" feature]] | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<!-- [rfced] May we rephrase the following sentence starting at "for example | ||||
as regards..." as follows to improve clarity? | ||||
Original: | ||||
To indicate possible features or peculiarities, each main element of | ||||
the manifestation MAY be followed by further specifications | ||||
(separated by ";"), for example as regards editor the archive name | ||||
and the electronic publisher, for format the version, etc. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
To indicate possible features or peculiarities, each main element of | ||||
the manifestation MAY be followed by further specifications | ||||
(separated by “;”), for example, the archive name and electronic publisher | ||||
for editor and the version for format. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>To indicate possible features or peculiarities, each main element of | <t>To indicate possible features or peculiarities, each main element of | |||
the manifestation MAY be followed by further specifications | the manifestation <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be followed by further specifications | |||
(separated by ";"), for example as regards editor the archive name | (separated by ";"), for example as regards editor the archive name | |||
and the electronic publisher, for format the version, etc. | and the electronic publisher, for format the version, etc. | |||
Therefore the main elements of the manifestation will assume the | Therefore, the main elements of the manifestation will assume the | |||
forms:</t> | following forms:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
editor = publisher *(";" specification) | editor = publisher *(";" specification) | |||
format = mime *(";" specification) | format = mime *(";" specification) | |||
component = part *(";" specification) | component = part *(";" specification) | |||
feature = attribute *(";" specification) | feature = attribute *(";" specification) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>The syntax details of the manifestation element is shown in | <t>The syntax details of the manifestation element are shown in | |||
<xref target="urn-lex-syn"/>, in the related part.</t> | <xref target="urn-lex-syn"/> in the related part.</t> | |||
<t>(examples (hypothetical):</t> | ||||
<t>the original version of the Italian act 3 April 2000, n. 56 might hav | <t>The following are hypothetical examples:</t> | |||
e | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li><t>The original version of the Italian act 3 April 2000, n. 56 might | ||||
have | ||||
the following manifestations with their relative uniform names:</t> | the following manifestations with their relative uniform names:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
- PDF format (vers. 1.7) of the whole act edited by the Italian | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
Parliament: | ||||
"urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$application-pdf; | <li><t>PDF format (vers. 1.7) of the whole act edited by the Italian Parliament: | |||
1.7:parlamento.it" | </t> | |||
- XML format (version 2.2 DTD NIR) of the text of the act and PDF | ||||
format (version 1.7) of the "Figura 1" (figure 1) contained in the | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
body, edited by the Italian Senate: | urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$application-pdf; | |||
"urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$text-xml;dtd-nir-2.2: | 1.7:parlamento.it | |||
senato.it:testo" | ||||
"urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$application-pdf;1.7: | ||||
senato.it:figura.1" | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>the Spanish URN of the html format of the whole Judgment of the | </li> | |||
<li><t>XML format (version 2.2 DTD NIR) of the text of the act and PDF format | ||||
(version 1.7) of the "Figura 1" (figure 1) contained in the body, edited by | ||||
the Italian Senate:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$text-xml;dtd-nir-2.2: | ||||
senato.it:testo | ||||
urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$application-pdf;1.7: | ||||
senato.it:figura.1 | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li><t>The Spanish URN of the HTML format of the whole Judgment of the | ||||
European Court of Justice n. 33/08 of 11/06/2009, in Spanish version, | European Court of Justice n. 33/08 of 11/06/2009, in Spanish version, | |||
published in the Jurifast database in anonymized form:</t> | published in the Jurifast database in anonymized form:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
"urn:lex:eu:tribunal.justicia:sentencia:2009-06-11;33-08 | urn:lex:eu:tribunal.justicia:sentencia:2009-06-11;33-08 | |||
@original:es$text-html:juradmin.eu;jurifast:todo:anonimo") | @original:es$text-html:juradmin.eu;jurifast:todo:anonimo | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork></li> | |||
</ul> | ||||
<t>It is useful to be able to assign a uniform name to a | <t>It is useful to be able to assign a uniform name to a | |||
manifestation (or to a part of it) in case non-textual objects are | manifestation (or to a part of it) in case non-textual objects are | |||
involved. These may be multimedia objects that are non-textual in | involved. These may be multimedia objects that are non-textual in | |||
their own right (e.g. geographic maps, photographs, etc.), or texts | their own right (e.g., geographic maps, photographs, etc.) or texts | |||
recorded in non-textual formats, such as image scans of documents.</t> | recorded in non-textual formats (e.g., image scans of documents).</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="sources-of-law-references"> | <section anchor="sources-of-law-references"> | |||
<name>Sources of Law References</name> | <name>Sources of Law References</name> | |||
<t>References to sources of law often refer to specific partitions of | <t>References to sources of law often refer to specific partitions of | |||
the act (article, paragraph, etc.) and not to the entire document.</t> | the act (article, paragraph, etc.) and not to the entire document.</t> | |||
<t>From a legal point of view, a partition is always a text block, that | <t>From a legal point of view, a partition is always a text block that | |||
represents a logical subdivision of an act.</t> | represents a logical subdivision of an act.</t> | |||
<t>As regards the digital representation, | <t>In the digital representation, a partition is represented | |||
a partition is | by an element (a block of text) with its own ID; this ID aims to | |||
represented by an element (a block of text) with its own ID; this ID | identify the related element and locate it. Therefore, | |||
aims to identify the related element and to locate it. In this case, | it is possible to either extract or point to a | |||
therefore, it is possible either to extract or to point to a | partition.</t> | |||
partition.</t> | ||||
<t>In a mark-up not fitting the logical structure of the text (as HTML), | <t>For markup that does not fit the logical structure of the text (like | |||
HTML), | ||||
generally only the starting point of the partition, rather than the | generally only the starting point of the partition, rather than the | |||
whole block of text or element, is identified through a label (a <a | whole block of text or element, is identified through a label (e.g., <a | |||
id=partitionID></a> tag in Html Markup Language <xref target="W3C.HTML" | id=partitionID></a> tag in the HTML markup language <xref target="W3C.H | |||
/>). In this case | TML"/>). In this case, it is only possible to point to a partition but not extra | |||
therefore it is not possible to extract a partition but only to point | ct it.</t> | |||
to it.</t> | ||||
<t>Partitions should be assigned unique labels or | <t>Partitions should be assigned unique labels or | |||
IDs within the including document and their value should be the same | IDs within the including document, and their value should be the same | |||
regardless of document format.</t> | regardless of document format.</t> | |||
<t>For enabling the construction of the partition identifier between | <t>To enable the construction of the partition identifier between | |||
different collections of documents, specific construction rules for | different collections of documents, specific construction rules for | |||
IDs or labels will be defined and shared, within each country or | IDs or labels will be defined and shared within each country or | |||
jurisdiction, for any document type<br/> | jurisdiction for any document type. For example, in legislation, paragra | |||
(e.g., for legislation, the | ph 2 of | |||
paragraph 2 of the article 3 might have as label or ID the value | article 3 might have the value "art3;par2" as the label or ID; | |||
"art3;par2", similarly for case-law, paragraph 22 of the judgment in | similarly, for case law, paragraph 22 of the judgment in | |||
Case 46/76 Bauhuis v Netherlands, might have as label or ID the value | Case 46/76 Bauhuis v Netherlands might have the value "par22" as the lab | |||
"par22").</t> | el or ID.</t> | |||
<t>Furthermore, it is useful to foresee the compatibility with | <t>Furthermore, it is useful to foresee the compatibility with | |||
applications able to manage this information (e.g., returning the | applications that are able to manage this information (e.g., returning the | |||
proper element); these procedures are particularly useful in the case | proper element); these procedures are particularly useful in the case | |||
of rather long acts, such as codes, constitutions, regulations, etc. | of rather long acts, such as codes, constitutions, regulations, etc. | |||
For this purpose it is necessary that the partition identifier is | For this purpose, it is necessary that the partition identifier be | |||
transmitted to the servers (resolution and application) and therefore | transmitted to the servers (resolution and application). Therefore, | |||
it cannot be separated by the typical "#" character of URI fragment, | it cannot be separated by the typical "#" character of URI fragment, | |||
which is not transmitted to the server.</t> | which is not transmitted to the server.</t> | |||
<t>According to these requirements, the syntax of a reference is:</t> | <t>According to these requirements, the syntax of a reference is:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
URN-reference = URN-document ["~" partition-id] | URN-reference = URN-document ["~" partition-id] | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., to refer to the paragraph 3 of the article 15 of the French | <t>For example, referring to paragraph 3 of article 15 of the French | |||
Act of 15 May 2004, n. 106, the reference can be | Act of 15 May 2004, n. 106, the reference can be | |||
"urn:lex:fr:etat:loi:2004-05-15;106~art15;par3").</t> | "urn:lex:fr:etat:loi:2004-05-15;106~art15;par3".</t> | |||
<t>Using a different separator ("~") from the document name, the | <!-- [rfced] How may we clarify "Using a different separator ("~") from the | |||
partition ID is not withheld by the browser but it is transmitted to | document name" here? | |||
the resolution process. This enables the resolver to retrieve (for | ||||
example, out of a database) only the referred partition, if the | Original: | |||
partition syntax is compatible with the media type used, otherwise to | Using a different separator ("~") from the document name, the | |||
return the whole act.</t> | partition ID is not withheld by the browser but it is transmitted to | |||
the resolution process. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
If a different separator ("~") is used after the document name, the | ||||
partition ID is not withheld by the browser but is transmitted to | ||||
the resolution process. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>Using a different separator ("~") from the document name, the | ||||
partition ID is not withheld by the browser but is transmitted to | ||||
the resolution process. | ||||
If the | ||||
partition syntax is compatible with the media type used, this enables the resolv | ||||
er to retrieve (for | ||||
example, out of a database) only the referred partition; otherwise, the whole ac | ||||
t is returned. | ||||
</t> | ||||
<t>When resolving to HTTP, | <t>When resolving to HTTP, | |||
the resolver SHALL transform the partition ID | the resolver <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14> transform the partition ID | |||
to an appropriate internal reference (#) in the page, | to an appropriate internal reference (#) on the page | |||
or at the beginning if that point cannot be found. | or at the beginning if that point cannot be found. | |||
The transformation in URI fragment is obtained appending to | The transformation in the URI fragment is obtained by appending the "#" characte | |||
the URL the "#" character followed by the partition ID (in the | r followed by the partition ID to | |||
the URL (in the | ||||
example above, the returned URL will be <URL-document>#art15;par3). | example above, the returned URL will be <URL-document>#art15;par3). | |||
Doing this, knowing the granularity of the act markup, the resolver | Doing this, knowing the granularity of the act markup, the resolver | |||
could exploit the hierarchical structure of the ID, eliminating | could exploit the hierarchical structure of the ID by eliminating | |||
sub-partitions not addressed. If only the article was identified in the | sub-partitions that are not addressed. In the previous example, if only the arti | |||
act, in the previous example it could return <URL-document>#art15 | cle was identified in the | |||
act, it could return <URL-document>#art15 | ||||
only.</t> | only.</t> | |||
<t>It is possible to use the general syntax (with "#"); in this | <t>It is possible to use the general syntax (with "#"); in this | |||
case only the URN document component of the reference is transmitted | case, only the URN document component of the reference is transmitted | |||
to the resolver, therefore the whole document will always be | to the resolver; therefore, the whole document will always be | |||
retrieved.</t> | retrieved.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="syn-work"> | <section anchor="syn-work"> | |||
<name>Specific Syntax of the Identifier at "Work" Level</name> | <name>Specific Syntax of the Identifier at "Work" Level</name> | |||
<section anchor="the-authority-element"> | <section anchor="the-authority-element"> | |||
<name>The authority Element</name> | <name>The Authority Element</name> | |||
<section anchor="indication-of-the-authority"> | <section anchor="indication-of-the-authority"> | |||
<name>Indication of the Authority</name> | <name>Indication of the Authority</name> | |||
<t>The authority element of a uniform name may indicate, in the | <t>The authority element of a uniform name may indicate the following in the | |||
various cases:</t> | various cases:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the actual authority issuing the legal provision. More | <t>The actual authority issuing the legal provision. More | |||
specifically, the authority adopting the provision or enacting it;</t> | specifically, the authority adopting the provision or enacting it.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the institution where the provision is registered, known and | <t>The institution where the provision is registered, known, and | |||
referenced to, even if produced by others (e.g., the bills | referenced to, even if produced by others (e.g., the bills | |||
identified through the reference to the Chamber where they are | identified through the reference to the Chamber where they are | |||
presented);</t> | presented).</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the institution regulated (and referred to in citations) by the | <t>The institution regulated (and referred to in citations) by the | |||
legal provision even when this is issued by another authority | legal provision even when this is issued by another authority | |||
(e.g., the statute of a Body);</t> | (e.g., the statute of a Body).</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the entity that proposed the legal material not yet included in | <t>The entity that proposed the legal material not yet included in | |||
the | the | |||
institutional process (e.g. a proposed bill written by a | institutional process (e.g., a proposed bill written by a | |||
political party).</t> | political party).</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="multiple-issuers"> | <section anchor="multiple-issuers"> | |||
<name>Multiple Issuers</name> | <name>Multiple Issuers</name> | |||
<t>Some sources of law are enacted by a number of issuing parties (e.g ., | <t>Some sources of law are enacted by a number of issuing parties (e.g ., | |||
inter-ministerial decrees, agreements, etc.). In this case, the | inter-ministerial decrees, agreements, etc.). In this case, the | |||
authority element contains all the issuing parties (properly | authority element contains all the issuing parties (properly | |||
separated), as follows:</t> | separated) as follows:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
authority = issuer *("+" issuer) | authority = issuer *("+" issuer) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., "ministry.justice+ministry.finances").</t> | <t>This is an example: "ministry.justice+ministry.finances".</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="indication-of-the-issuer"> | <section anchor="indication-of-the-issuer"> | |||
<name>Indication of the Issuer</name> | <name>Indication of the Issuer</name> | |||
<t>Each issuing authority is essentially represented by either an | <t>Each issuing authority is essentially represented by either an | |||
institutional office (e.g., Prime Minister) or an institution (e.g., | institutional office (e.g., Prime Minister) or an institution (e.g., | |||
Ministry); in the last case, the authority is indicated in accordance | Ministry); in the last case, the authority is indicated in accordance | |||
with the institution's hierarchical structure, from the more general | with the institution's hierarchical structure, from more general | |||
to more specific (Council, Department, etc.), ending with the | to more specific (Council, Department, etc.), ending with the | |||
relative office (President, Director, etc.). | relative office (President, Director, etc.). | |||
Therefore, the structure of the issuer is as follows:</t> | Therefore, the structure of the issuer is as follows:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
issuer = (institution *(";" body-function)) / office | issuer = (institution *(";" body-function)) / office | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., "ministry.finances;department.revenues;manager")</t> | <t>This is an example: "ministry.finances;department.revenues;manager" | |||
.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="indication-of-the-body"> | <section anchor="indication-of-the-body"> | |||
<name>Indication of the Body</name> | <name>Indication of the Body</name> | |||
<t>Depending on the kind of measure, the body within the issuing | <t>Depending on the kind of measure, the body within the issuing | |||
authority is unambiguously determined (e.g., the Council for Regional | authority is unambiguously determined (e.g., the Council for Regional | |||
Acts) and normally it is not indicated in the references. | Acts), and it is not normally indicated in the references. | |||
Just like in practice, the indication of the enacting authority is | Just like in practice, the indication of the enacting authority is | |||
limited to the minimum in relation to the type of measure<br/> | limited to the minimum in relation to the type of measure | |||
(e.g., "region.tuscany:act" and not "region.tuscany;council:act").</t> | (e.g., "region.tuscany:act" and not "region.tuscany;council:act").</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="indication-of-the-function"> | <section anchor="indication-of-the-function"> | |||
<name>Indication of the Function</name> | <name>Indication of the Function</name> | |||
<t>Generally, the function is indicated, sometimes instead of the body | <t>Generally, the function is indicated, sometimes instead of the body | |||
itself:</t> | itself:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>in case of political, representative or elective offices<br/> | <t>In the case of political, representative, or elective offices | |||
(e.g., "university.oxford;rector:decree" instead of | (e.g., "university.oxford;rector:decree" instead of | |||
"university.oxford;rectorship:decree");</t> | "university.oxford;rectorship:decree").</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>when it refers to a top officer in the institution (e.g., gener | <t>When referring to a top officer in the institution (e.g., gener | |||
al | al | |||
manager, general secretary, etc.) which is not always possible to | manager, general secretary, etc.), which is not always possible to | |||
associate a specific internal institutional structure to<br/> | associate a specific internal institutional structure to | |||
(e.g., "national.council.research;general.manager").</t> | (e.g., "national.council.research;general.manager").</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<t>It is not indicated when it clearly corresponds to the person in | <t>It is not indicated when it clearly corresponds to the person in | |||
charge of an institution (typically, a general director); in this | charge of an institution (typically, a general director); in this | |||
case, only the structure and not the person in charge is indicated<br/> | case, only the structure and not the person in charge is indicated | |||
(e.g., "ministry.justice;department.penitentiary.administration").</t> | (e.g., "ministry.justice;department.penitentiary.administration").</t> | |||
<t>The function MUST be indicated when:</t> | <t>The function <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be indicated when:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>it is not the same of the director or the person in charge of t | <t>It is not the same as the director or the person in charge of t | |||
he | he | |||
structure (for example, in case of an undersecretary, a deputy | structure (for example, an undersecretary, a deputy | |||
director, etc.);</t> | director, etc.). </t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the type of measure may be both monocratic or collegial: the | <t>The type of measure may be both monocratic or collegial; the | |||
indication of the office eliminates the ambiguity.</t> | indication of the office eliminates the ambiguity.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="conventions-for-the-authority"> | <section anchor="conventions-for-the-authority"> | |||
<name>Conventions for the Authority</name> | <name>Conventions for the Authority</name> | |||
<t>Acts and measures bearing the same relevance as an act, issued or | <t>Acts and measures bearing the same relevance as an act, issued or | |||
enacted since the foundation of the State, have conventionally | enacted since the foundation of the State, have conventionally | |||
indicated "state" (expressed in each country official language) as | indicated "state" (expressed in each country's official language) as | |||
authority; the same convention is used for constitutions, codes | the authority. The same convention is used for constitutions, codes | |||
(civil, criminal, civil procedure, criminal procedure, etc) and | (civil, criminal, civil procedure, criminal procedure, etc.), and | |||
international treaties.</t> | international treaties.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="the-measure-element"> | <section anchor="the-measure-element"> | |||
<name>The measure Element</name> | <name>The Measure Element</name> | |||
<section anchor="criteria-for-the-indication-of-the-type-of-measure"> | <section anchor="criteria-for-the-indication-of-the-type-of-measure"> | |||
<name>Criteria for the Indication of the Type of Measure</name> | <name>Criteria for the Indication of the Type of Measure</name> | |||
<t>In uniform names the issuing authority of a document is mandatory. | ||||
This makes unnecessary to indicate any further qualification of the | <t>In uniform names, the issuing authority of a document is mandatory. | |||
This makes it unnecessary to indicate any further qualification of the | ||||
measure (e.g., ministerial decree, directorial ordinance, etc.), even | measure (e.g., ministerial decree, directorial ordinance, etc.), even | |||
if it is widely used. | if it is widely used. | |||
When the authority-measure combination clearly identifies a specific | When the authority-measure combination clearly identifies a specific | |||
document, the type of measure is not defined through attributes | document, the type of measure is not defined through attributes | |||
referring to the enacting authority<br/> | referring to the enacting authority | |||
(e.g., "region.tuscany:act" and not "region.tuscany:regional.act").</t> | (e.g., "region.tuscany:act" and not "region.tuscany:regional.act").</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="further-specification-to-the-type-of-measure"> | <section anchor="further-specification-to-the-type-of-measure"> | |||
<name>Further Specification to the Type of Measure</name> | <name>Further Specification to the Type of Measure</name> | |||
<t>In the measure element, it is usually sufficient to indicate the | <t>In the measure element, it is usually sufficient to indicate the | |||
type of a measure. As usual, references to sources of law, rather | type of a measure. As usual, rather than through the formal details | |||
than through the formal details (date and number), may be made | (date and number), references to sources of law may be made through | |||
through some of their characteristics such as the subject-matter | some of their characteristics, such as the subject matter covered | |||
covered (e.g., accounting regulations), nicknames referring to the | (e.g., accounting regulations), nicknames referring to the promoter | |||
promoter (e.g., Bolkestein directive) or to the topic of the act (e.g., | (e.g., Bolkestein directive), or the topic of the act (e.g., | |||
Bankruptcy Law), etc.. | Bankruptcy Law), etc. In these cases, the type of measure | |||
In these cases, the type of measure MAY be followed by further | <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be followed by further specifications that are | |||
specifications useful in referencing even if the details are lacking:</t> | useful in referencing, even if the details are lacking:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
measure = measure-type *(";" specification) | measure = measure-type *(";" specification) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., "regulations;accounting" or "act;bankruptcy").</t> | <t>These are examples: "regulations;accounting" or "act;bankruptcy".</ | |||
t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="aliases-for-sources-of-law-with-different-normative-ref erences"> | <section anchor="aliases-for-sources-of-law-with-different-normative-ref erences"> | |||
<name>Aliases for Sources of Law with Different Normative References</ name> | <name>Aliases for Sources of Law with Different Normative References</ name> | |||
<t>There are legislative measures that, although unique, are usually | <t>There are legislative measures that, although unique, are usually | |||
cited in different ways, for example through the legislative act | cited in different ways, for example, introducing them into the | |||
introducing them into the legal order (President's decree, | legal order through a legislative act (President's decree, | |||
legislative decree, etc.) or through their legislative category | legislative decree, etc.) or through their legislative category | |||
(regulations, consolidation, etc.). | (regulations, consolidation, etc.). In order to ensure the validity o | |||
In order to ensure, in all the cases, the validity of the references, | f the references in all cases, an alias (an additional URN LEX | |||
an alias (additional URN LEX identifier), that takes into account the | identifier) that takes into account the measure category is added | |||
measure category, is added to what represents the legislative form of | to what represents the legislative form of the same act (e.g., | |||
the same act<br/> | "state:decree.legislative:1992-07-24;358" and | |||
(e.g., "state:decree.legislative:1992-07-24;358" and | "state:consolidation;public.contracts:1992-07-24;358").</t> | |||
"state:consolidation;public.contracts:1992-07-24;358").</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="relations-between-measure-and-authority-in-the-aliases" > | <section anchor="relations-between-measure-and-authority-in-the-aliases" > | |||
<name>Relations between Measure and Authority in the Aliases</name> | <name>Relations Between Measure and Authority in the Aliases</name> | |||
<t>The sources of law including different normative references are | <t>The sources of law including different normative references are | |||
usually introduced in legislation through the adoption or the issuing | usually introduced in legislation through the adoption or the issuing | |||
of an act, which they are either included or attached to. It is, | of an act, which they are either included or attached to. Therefore, it is | |||
therefore, necessary to create an alias linking the two aspects of | necessary to create an alias linking the two aspects of | |||
the same document. Specifically, the different measures can be:</t> | the same document. Specifically, the different measures can be:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>adopted/issued by an authority different from the one regulated | <t>Adopted/issued by an authority different from the one regulated | |||
by | by | |||
the provision (e.g., the statute of a Body); in this case, the | the provision (e.g., the statute of a Body). In this case, the | |||
correlation is established between two uniform names each featuring | correlation is established between two uniform names, each featuring | |||
a completely different authority element<br/> | a completely different authority element | |||
(e.g., "italian.society.authors.publishers:statute" and | (e.g., "italian.society.authors.publishers:statute" and | |||
"ministry.cultural.activities+ministry.finances.budget.economic. | "ministry.cultural.activities+ministry.finances.budget.economic. | |||
planning:decree");</t> | planning:decree").</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>issued by the institution itself either because it has issuing | <t>Issued by the institution itself either because it has issuing | |||
authority or by virtue of a proxy (e.g., a provision that refers to | authority or by virtue of a proxy (e.g., a provision that refers to | |||
the functioning of the Body itself); in this case, the two aliases | the functioning of the Body itself). In this case, the two aliases | |||
share the first part of the authority<br/> | share the first part of the authority | |||
(e.g., "municipality.firenze:statute" and | (e.g., "municipality.firenze:statute" and | |||
"municipality.firenze;council:deliberation");</t> | "municipality.firenze;council:deliberation").</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>issued by the same Body to regulate a particular sector of its | <t>Issued by the same Body to regulate a particular sector of its | |||
own | own | |||
competence; in this case the authority element is the same<br/> | competence. In this case, the authority element is the same | |||
(e.g., "ministry.justice:regulation;use.information.tools. | (e.g., "ministry.justice:regulation;use.information.tools. | |||
telematic.process" and "ministry.justice:decree").</t> | telematic.process" and "ministry.justice:decree").</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="det-elem"> | <section anchor="det-elem"> | |||
<name>The Details Element</name> | <name>The Details Element</name> | |||
<section anchor="indication-of-the-details"> | <section anchor="indication-of-the-details"> | |||
<name>Indication of the Details</name> | <name>Indication of the Details</name> | |||
<t>The details of a source of law usually include the date of the | <t>The details of a source of law usually include the date of the | |||
enactment and the identification number (inclusion in the body of | enactment and the identification number (inclusion in the body of | |||
laws, register, protocol, etc.).</t> | laws, register, protocol, etc.).</t> | |||
<t>Some measures can have multiple dates; there are also cases in whic h | <t>Some measures can have multiple dates. There are also cases in whic h | |||
the number of the measure does not exist (unnumbered measures) or a | the number of the measure does not exist (unnumbered measures) or a | |||
measure has multiple numbers (e.g., unified cases). For these | measure has multiple numbers (e.g., unified cases). For these | |||
reasons, the set up of both elements (date and number) includes | reasons, the setup of both elements (date and number) includes | |||
multiple values.</t> | multiple values.</t> | |||
<t>Some institutions (e.g., the Parliaments) usually identify document s | <t>Some institutions (e.g., the Parliaments) usually identify document s | |||
through their period of reference (e.g., the legislature number) | through their period of reference (e.g., the legislature number) | |||
rather than through a date, which would be much less meaningful and | rather than through a date, which would be much less meaningful and | |||
never used in references (e.g., Senate bill S.2544 of the XIV | never used in references (e.g., Senate bill S.2544 of the XIV | |||
legislature). In these cases, the component period is used in | legislature). In these cases, the component period is | |||
substitution of the component dates.</t> | substitued for the component dates.</t> | |||
<t>Usually details of a measure are not reported according to a specif | <t>Usually, details of a measure are not reported according to a speci | |||
ic | fic | |||
sequence; in accordance with the global structure of the uniform | sequence. In accordance with the global structure of the uniform | |||
name, which goes from the general to the specific, the sequence | name, which goes from general to specific, the sequence | |||
date-number has the following form:</t> | date-number has the following form:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
details = (dates / period) ";" numbers | details = (dates / period) ";" numbers | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., "2000-12-06;126", "14.legislature;s.2544").</t> | <t>The following are examples: "2000-12-06;126" and "14.legislature;s. | |||
2544".</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="multiple-dates"> | <section anchor="multiple-dates"> | |||
<name>Multiple Dates</name> | <name>Multiple Dates</name> | |||
<t>Some sources of law, even if unique, are identified by more than on e | <t>Some sources of law, even if unique, are identified by more than on e | |||
date; in this case, in the field dates all the given dates are to | date. In this case, all the given dates are to | |||
be reported and indicated as follows:</t> | be reported and indicated as follows:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
dates = date *("," date) | dates = date *("," date) | |||
]]></sourcecode> | ||||
<t>For example, the measure of the Data Protection Authority of | ||||
December 30, 1999-January 13, 2000, No. 1/P/2000 has the following | ||||
uniform name:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
personal.data.protection.authority:measure:1999-12-30,2000-01- | ||||
13;1-p-2000 | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>(e.g., the measure of the Data Protection Authority of December 30, | ||||
1999-January 13, 2000, No. 1/P/2000 has the following uniform name:<br/> | <t>As specified in <xref target="dat-form"/>, all the dates can have | |||
"personal.data.protection.authority:measure:1999-12-30,2000-01-13; | the date typical of the jurisdiction in addition to the ISO | |||
1-p-2000").</t> | format.</t> | |||
<t>As specified in <xref target="dat-form"/>, all the dates can have, | ||||
in addition to the ISO format, | ||||
also the date typical of the jurisdiction.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="unnumbered-measures"> | <section anchor="unnumbered-measures"> | |||
<name>Unnumbered Measures</name> | <name>Unnumbered Measures</name> | |||
<t>Measures not officially numbered in the publications may have a | <t>Measures not officially numbered in the publications may have a | |||
non-unequivocal identifier, because several measures of the same type | non-unequivocal identifier, because several measures of the same type | |||
can exist, issued on the same day by the same authority. | can exist and can be issued on the same day by the same authority. | |||
To ensure that the uniform name is unambiguous, the numbers field | To ensure that the uniform name is unambiguous, the numbers field | |||
MUST, in any case, contain a discriminating element, which can be any | <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, in any case, contain a discriminating element, which can be | |||
identifier used internally, and not published, by the authority | any | |||
identifier used internally and not published by the authority | ||||
(e.g., protocol).</t> | (e.g., protocol).</t> | |||
<t>If the authority does not have its own identifier, one identifier | <t>If the authority does not have its own identifier, one identifier | |||
MUST be created for the name system. In order to easily differentiate | <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be created for the name system. In order to easily different iate | |||
it, such number is preceded by the string "lex-":</t> | it, such number is preceded by the string "lex-":</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
number-lex = "lex-" 1*DIGIT | number-lex = "lex-" 1*DIGIT | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., "ministry.finances:decree:1999-12-20;lex-3").</t> | <t>The following is an example: "ministry.finances:decree:1999-12-20;l | |||
<t>It is responsibility of the authority issuing a document to assign | ex-3".</t> | |||
a | <t>It is the responsibility of the authority issuing a document to ass | |||
discriminating specification to it; in case of multiple authorities, | ign a | |||
discriminating specification to it. When there are multiple authorities, | ||||
only one of them is responsible for the assignment of the number to | only one of them is responsible for the assignment of the number to | |||
the document (e.g., the proponent).</t> | the document (e.g., the proponent).</t> | |||
<t>The unnumbered measures published on an official publication (e.g., | <t>The unnumbered measures published on an official publication (e.g., | |||
the Official Gazette), instead of by a progressive number are | the Official Gazette), are | |||
recognized by the univocal identifying label printed on the paper. | recognized by the univocal identifying label printed on the paper instead of by | |||
Such an identifier, even if unofficial but assigned to a document in | a progressive number. | |||
an official publication, is to be preferred because it has the clear | Such an identifier, even if it is unofficial but assigned to a document in | |||
advantage to be public and therefore easier to be found.</t> | an official publication, is preferred because it has the clear | |||
advantage of being public and is therefore easier to find.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="mult-num"> | <section anchor="mult-num"> | |||
<name>Multiple Numbers</name> | <name>Multiple Numbers</name> | |||
<t>Some legal documents (e.g., bills), even if unique, are identified by | <t>Some legal documents (e.g., bills), even if unique, are identified by | |||
a set of numbers (e.g., the unification of cases or bills). | a set of numbers (e.g., the unification of cases or bills). | |||
In this case, in the numbers field, all the identifiers are | In this case, in the numbers field, all the identifiers are | |||
reported, according to the following structure:</t> | reported, according to the following structure:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
numbers = document-id *("," document-id) | numbers = document-id *("," document-id) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>(e.g., "2000-06-12;c-10-97,c-11-97,c-12-97").</t> | <t>The following is an example: "2000-06-12;c-10-97,c-11-97,c-12-97".< | |||
<t>The characters which are not allowed (e.g., "/") or reserved (e.g., | /t> | |||
":"), including the comma, cannot exist inside the document-id, and | <t>The characters that are not allowed (e.g., "/") or reserved (e.g., | |||
therefore MUST be turned into "-".</t> | ":"), including the comma, cannot exist inside the document-id and | |||
<t>Where special characters contained in the number of the act are | therefore <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be turned into "-".</t> | |||
distinctive of the act itself (e.g. bill n. 123-bis (removal of 123) | ||||
<t>When special characters contained in the number of the act are | ||||
distinctive of the act itself (e.g., bill n. 123-bis (removal of 123) | ||||
and n. 123/bis (return of 123)) and would disappear with the | and n. 123/bis (return of 123)) and would disappear with the | |||
conversion to "-", a further ending must be added, allowing to | conversion to "-", a further ending must be added to | |||
distinguish the acts (e.g. bill n.123-bis-removal and 123-bis- | distinguish the acts (e.g., bill n.123-bis-removal and 123-bis-return).</t> | |||
return).</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="the-annex-element"> | <section anchor="the-annex-element"> | |||
<name>The annex Element</name> | <name>The Annex Element</name> | |||
<section anchor="annex-formal"> | <section anchor="annex-formal"> | |||
<name>Formal Annexes</name> | <name>Formal Annexes</name> | |||
<t>Although annexes are an integral part of the legal document, they m | <t>Although annexes are an integral part of a legal document, they | |||
ay | may be referred to and undergo amendments separately from the act to | |||
be referred to and undergo amendments separately from the act to | which they are annexed. Therefore, it is necessary that both the | |||
which they are annexed. It is, therefore, necessary that both the | main document as well as each formal individual annex is | |||
main document as well as each formal individual annex is | unequivocally identified.</t> | |||
unequivocally identified.</t> | <t>Formal annexes may be registered as separate parts or together | |||
<t>Formal annexes may be registered as separate parts or together with | with a legal provision; they may or may not be autonomous in nature. I | |||
a | n | |||
legal provision; they may also be autonomous in nature or not. In any | any case, they <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be given a uniform name that | |||
case, they MUST be given a uniform name, which includes the uniform | includes the uniform name of the source of law to which they are | |||
name of the source of law to which they are attached, and a suffix | attached and a suffix that identifies the annex itself.</t> | |||
which identifies the annex itself.</t> | ||||
<t>The suffix of formal annexes includes the official heading of the | <t>The suffix of formal annexes includes the official heading of the | |||
annex and, possibly, further specifications (e.g., the title) which | annex and, possibly, further specifications (e.g., the title) that | |||
will facilitate the retrieval of the annex in case the identifier is | will facilitate the retrieval of the annex in case the identifier is | |||
missing:</t> | missing:</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
annex = annex-id *(";" specification) | annex = annex-id *(";" specification) | |||
]]></sourcecode> | ||||
<t>The following is an example:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
region.sicily;council:deliberation:1998-02-12;14:annex.a; | ||||
borders.park | ||||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>(e.g., "region.sicily;council:deliberation:1998-02-12;14:annex.a; | <t>The characters that are not allowed (e.g., "/") or that are | |||
borders.park").</t> | reserved (e.g., ":") must not be featured in the annex-id and | |||
<t>The characters which are not allowed (e.g. "/") or which are reserv | therefore <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be turned into ".".</t> | |||
ed | ||||
(e.g. ":") must not be featured in the annex-id and therefore MUST | ||||
be turned into ".".</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="annex-annex"> | <section anchor="annex-annex"> | |||
<name>Annexes of Annexes</name> | <name>Annexes of Annexes</name> | |||
<t>When there are annexes to an annex, their corresponding identifiers | ||||
are created by adding to the identifier of the original annex those | <t>When there are annexes to an annex, their corresponding identifiers are | |||
of the annexes that are connected with it (that is, attached to it)<br/> | created by adding to the identifier of the original annex those of the | |||
(e.g., Table 1 attached to the Annex A of the preceding legal act | annexes that are connected with it (that is, attached to it). For example, | |||
has the following uniform name:<br/> | Table 1 attached to the Annex A of the preceding legal act has the | |||
"region.sicily;council:deliberation:1998-02-12;14:annex.a; | following uniform name:</t> | |||
borders.park:table.1;municipality.territories").</t> | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
</section> | region.sicily;council:deliberation:1998-02-12;14:annex.a; | |||
borders.park:table.1;municipality.territories | ||||
]]></artwork> | ||||
</section> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="syn-ver"> | <section anchor="syn-ver"> | |||
<name>Specific Syntax of the Version Element of the "Expression"</name> | <name>Specific Syntax of the Version Element of the "Expression"</name> | |||
<section anchor="the-version-element"> | <section anchor="the-version-element"> | |||
<name>The version Element</name> | <name>The Version Element</name> | |||
<section anchor="different-versions-of-a-legislative-document"> | <section anchor="different-versions-of-a-legislative-document"> | |||
<name>Different Versions of a Legislative Document</name> | <name>Different Versions of a Legislative Document</name> | |||
<t>The creation of an updated text of a document may have one of the | <t>The creation of an updated text of a document may have one of the | |||
following forms:</t> | following forms:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <dt>"multi-version":</dt><dd>Specific markups that identify the mo | |||
<t>"multi-version": when specific mark-ups which identify the modi | dified | |||
fied | parts of a document (added, substituted, or deleted parts) and their | |||
parts of a document (added, substituted or deleted parts) and their | related periods of effectiveness are indicated inside a single | |||
related periods of effectiveness are indicated inside one single | object (e.g., an XML file). Such a document will be able, in a | |||
object (e.g., an xml file). Such a document will be able, in a | ||||
dynamic way, to appear in different forms according to the | dynamic way, to appear in different forms according to the | |||
requested date of effectiveness. | requested date of effectiveness. | |||
In this document type, usually a set of metadata contains the | In this document type, a set of metadata usually contains the | |||
lifecycle of the document (from the original to the last | life cycle of the document (from the original to the last | |||
modification), including the validity time interval of each version | modification), including the validity time interval of each version | |||
and of each related text portion;</t> | and of each related text portion.</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>"single-version":</dt><dd>A new and distinct object | |||
<li> | ||||
<t>"single-version": when, on the contrary, a new and distinct obj | ||||
ect | ||||
is created for each amendment to the text at a given time. Each | is created for each amendment to the text at a given time. Each | |||
object is, therefore, characterized by its own period of validity. | object is, therefore, characterized by its own period of validity. | |||
In any case all the versions SHOULD be linked one another and | In any case, all the versions <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be linked to one another and | |||
immediately navigable.</t> | immediately navigable.</dd> | |||
</li> | </dl> | |||
</ul> | ||||
<t>In a "multi-version" document, each time interval should have a lin k | <t>In a "multi-version" document, each time interval should have a lin k | |||
to the related in-force document version which can be therefore | to the related in-force document version that can be | |||
displayed. | displayed. | |||
In a "single-version" document, the metadata should contain links to | In a "single-version" document, the metadata should contain links to | |||
all the previous modifications and a link only to the following | all the previous modifications and a link only to the following | |||
version, if any.</t> | version, if any.</t> | |||
<t><xref target="RFC8288"/> can be used as reference to establish link s between | <t><xref target="RFC8288"/> can be used as a reference to establish li nks between | |||
different document versions, either in the "multi-version" or in the | different document versions, either in the "multi-version" or in the | |||
"single-version" document. According to <xref target="RFC8288"/> the following | "single-version" document. According to <xref target="RFC8288"/>, the following | |||
relations are useful:</t> | relations are useful:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <dt>current (or last or last-version):</dt><dd>in-force version</d | |||
<t>current (or last or last-version): in-force version</t> | d> | |||
</li> | <dt>self:</dt><dd>this version</dd> | |||
<li> | <dt>next:</dt><dd>next version</dd> | |||
<t>self: this version</t> | <dt>previous:</dt><dd>previous version</dd> | |||
</li> | <dt>first:</dt><dd>original version</dd> | |||
<li> | </dl> | |||
<t>next: next version</t> | <t>It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that these relations be inserted i | |||
</li> | n the header of | |||
<li> | ||||
<t>previous: previous version</t> | ||||
</li> | ||||
<li> | ||||
<t>first: original version</t> | ||||
</li> | ||||
</ul> | ||||
<t>It is RECOMMENDED that these relations are inserted in the header o | ||||
f | ||||
each version (if "single-version") or associated to each entry | each version (if "single-version") or associated to each entry | |||
containing a single URN (if "multi-version").</t> | containing a single URN (if "multi-version").</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="ide-vers"> | <section anchor="ide-vers"> | |||
<name>Identification of the Version</name> | <name>Identification of the Version</name> | |||
<t>In order to identify the different time versions of the same act, t | <t>In order to identify the different time versions of the same act, a | |||
o | specific suffix has to be added to | |||
the uniform name of the original document has to be added a specific | the uniform name of the original document.</t> | |||
suffix.</t> | ||||
<t>Such a suffix identifies each version of a legal provision and | <t>Such a suffix identifies each version of a legal provision and | |||
includes, first and foremost, one of the following elements:</t> | includes, first and foremost, one of the following elements:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <ul spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the issuing date of the last amending measure taken into accoun t;</t> | <t>The issuing date of the last amending measure taken into accoun t.</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>the date in which the communication of the rectification or of | <t>The date that the communication of the rectification or | |||
the | errata corrige was published.</t> | |||
errata corrige, is published;</t> | ||||
</li> | </li> | |||
<li> | <li> | |||
<t>a specification which must identify the reason concerning the | <t>A specification that must identify the reason concerning the | |||
amendment (e.g., the specific phase of the legislative process), | amendment (e.g., the specific phase of the legislative process), | |||
for the cases in which the date is not usually used (e.g., bills).</t> | for the cases in which the date is not usually used (e.g., bills).</t> | |||
</li> | </li> | |||
</ul> | </ul> | |||
<!-- [rfced] How may we update this fragment to be a complete sentence? Also, | ||||
please clarify "in-force or effectiveness". | ||||
Original: | ||||
For example with regard to changes of the in-force | ||||
or effectiveness of any partition or portion of the text itself | ||||
(e.g., when the amendments introduced by an act are applied at | ||||
different times) or different events occurring on the same date. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
Examples include changes to the in-force | ||||
or effective version of any partition or portion of the text itself | ||||
(e.g., when the amendments introduced by an act are applied at | ||||
different times) or different events occurring on the same date. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>It is possible to add further specifications that will | <t>It is possible to add further specifications that will | |||
distinguish each of the different versions of the text to guarantee | distinguish each of the different versions of the text to guarantee | |||
identifier unequivocalness. For example with regard to changes of the | identifier unequivocalness. For example with regard to changes of the | |||
in-force or effectiveness of any partition or portion of the text | in-force or effectiveness of any partition or portion of the text | |||
itself (e.g., when the amendments introduced by an act are applied at | itself (e.g., when the amendments introduced by an act are applied at | |||
different times) or different events occurring on the same date.</t> | different times) or different events occurring on the same date.</t> | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
version = (amendment-date / specification) | version = (amendment-date / specification) | |||
*(";" (event-date / event)) | *(";" (event-date / event)) | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
<t>where:</t> | <t>where:</t> | |||
<ul spacing="normal"> | <dl newline="false" spacing="normal"> | |||
<li> | <dt>amendment-date:</dt><dd>Contains the issuing date of the last | |||
<t>amendment-date contains the issuing date of the last considered | considered | |||
amendment or of the last communication of amendment. In case the | amendment or of the last communication of amendment. If the | |||
original text introduces differentiated periods in which an act is | original text introduces differentiated periods in which an act is | |||
effective and the information system produces one version for each | effective and the information system produces one version for each | |||
of them, such element contains the string "original" expressed in | of them, such element contains the string "original" expressed in | |||
the language of the act or version;</t> | the language of the act or version.</dd> | |||
</li> | ||||
<li> | <dt>specification:</dt><dd>Contains any information that is useful | |||
<t>specification contains any information useful to identify unamb | to identify the version unambiguously | |||
iguously | and univocally.</dd> | |||
and univocally the version;</t> | ||||
</li> | <dt>event-date:</dt><dd>Contains the date in which a version is pu | |||
<li> | t into | |||
<t>event-date contains the date in which a version is put into | force, is effective, or is published.</dd> | |||
force, is effective or is published;</t> | ||||
</li> | <dt>event:</dt><dd>A name assigned to the event producing a furthe | |||
<li> | r version | |||
<t>event is a name assigned to the event producing a further versi | (e.g., amendment, decision, etc.).</dd> | |||
on | ||||
(e.g., amendment, decision, etc.).</t> | </dl> | |||
</li> | <t>The issuing date of an amending act was chosen as the identifier of | |||
</ul> | a | |||
<t>The issuing date of an amending act was chosen as identifier of a | version because it can be obtained from the heading (formal data). For example, | |||
version because it can be obtained from the heading (formal data)<br/> | the name "state:royal.decree:1941-01-30;12@1998-02-19" | |||
(e.g., the name "state:royal.decree:1941-01-30;12@1998-02-19" | ||||
identifies the updated text of the "Royal Decree of 30/1/1941, No. | identifies the updated text of the "Royal Decree of 30/1/1941, No. | |||
12" with the amendments introduced by the "Law Decree of 19/2/1998, | 12" with the amendments introduced by the "Law Decree of 19/2/1998, | |||
No. 51", without any indication of its actual entry into force.<br/> | No. 51" without any indication of its actual entry into force. | |||
The same uniform name with the additional ending ";1999-01-01" indicates | The same uniform name with the additional ending ";1999-01-01" indicates | |||
the in-force or effective version starting in a different date (from | the in-force or effective version starting on a different date (1/1/99).</t> | |||
1/1/99).</t> | <!-- [rfced] How may we clarify the text starting with "even if the object | |||
<t>For a full compatibility, every updating of a text or of the | remains only one"? | |||
Original: | ||||
For a full compatibility, every updating of a text or of the | ||||
effectiveness of a "multi-version" document implies the creation of a | ||||
new uniform name, even if the object remains only one, containing the | ||||
identifier of the virtually generated version, exactly as in the case | ||||
of a "single-version" document. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
For full compatibility, every update of text or of the | ||||
effectiveness of a "multi-version" document implies the creation of a | ||||
new uniform name, even if there is only one object that contains the | ||||
identifier of the virtually generated version, as in the case | ||||
of a "single-version" document. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>For full compatibility, every update of text or of the | ||||
effectiveness of a "multi-version" document implies the creation of a | effectiveness of a "multi-version" document implies the creation of a | |||
new uniform name, even if the object remains only one, containing the | new uniform name, even if the object remains only one, containing the | |||
identifier of the virtually generated version, exactly as in the case | identifier of the virtually generated version, exactly as in the case | |||
of a "single-version" document. A specific meta-data will associate | of a "single-version" document. | |||
every uniform name with the period of time during which such a name | ||||
together with its corresponding text is to be considered valid<br/> | Specific metadata will associate | |||
(e.g., the multi-version document containing the "R.D. of 01/30/1941, | every uniform name with the period of time during which such a name, | |||
together with its corresponding text, is to be considered valid | ||||
(e.g., the "multi-version" document containing "R.D. of 01/30/1941, | ||||
no. 12", updated by the amendments introduced by the "D.Lgs. of | no. 12", updated by the amendments introduced by the "D.Lgs. of | |||
02/19/1998, no. 51", contains the name of the original | 02/19/1998, no. 51", contains the name of the original version | |||
"state:royal.decree:1941-01-30;12" as well as the name of the updated | "state:royal.decree:1941-01-30;12" as well as the name of the updated | |||
version "state:royal.decree:1941-01-30;12@1998-02-19").</t> | version "state:royal.decree:1941-01-30;12@1998-02-19").</t> | |||
<t>Please note that in case of attachments or annexes, the creation of a | <t>Note that if there are attachments or annexes, the creation of a | |||
new version (even in the case of only one component) would imply the | new version (even in the case of only one component) would imply the | |||
creation of a new uniform name for all the connected objects in order | creation of a new uniform name for all the connected objects in order | |||
to guarantee their alignment (i.e., the main document, the | to guarantee their alignment (i.e., the main document, | |||
attachments and annexes).</t> | attachments, and annexes).</t> | |||
<t>As specified in <xref target="dat-form"/>, all the dates can have, | <t>As specified in <xref target="dat-form"/>, all the dates can have t | |||
in addition to the ISO format, | he date typical of the jurisdiction in addition to the date in ISO format.</t> | |||
also the date typical of the jurisdiction.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="urn-lex-syn"> | <section anchor="urn-lex-syn"> | |||
<name>Summary of the Syntax of the Uniform Names of the "lex" Namespace</n ame> | <name>Summary of the Syntax of the Uniform Names of the "lex" Namespace</n ame> | |||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ||||
/> | <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[ | |||
; Structure of a Uniform Resource Name (URN) of the "lex" namespace<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
; - NID-lex = namespace<br/> | ; Structure of a Uniform Resource Name (URN) of the "lex" namespace | |||
; - NSS-lex = specific name<br/> | ; - NID-lex = namespace | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ; - NSS-lex = specific name | |||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
URN-lex = "urn:" NID-lex ":" NSS-lex | URN-lex = "urn:" NID-lex ":" NSS-lex | |||
NID-lex = "lex" | NID-lex = "lex" | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of a "lex" specific name | |||
; Structure of a "lex" specific name<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
NSS-lex = jurisdiction ":" local-name | NSS-lex = jurisdiction ":" local-name | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the jurisdiction element | |||
; Structure of the jurisdiction element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
jurisdiction = jurisdiction-code *(";" jurisdiction-unit) | jurisdiction = jurisdiction-code *(";" jurisdiction-unit) | |||
jurisdiction-code = 2*alf-dot | jurisdiction-code = 2*alf-dot | |||
jurisdiction-unit = alf-dot | jurisdiction-unit = alf-dot | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the local-name element | |||
; Structure of the local-name element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
local-name = work ["@" expression] ["$" manifestation] | local-name = work ["@" expression] ["$" manifestation] | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the work element | |||
; Structure of the work element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
work = authority ":" measure ":" details *(":" annex) | work = authority ":" measure ":" details *(":" annex) | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the authority element | |||
; Structure of the authority element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
authority = issuer *("+" issuer) | authority = issuer *("+" issuer) | |||
issuer = (institution *(";" body-function)) / office | issuer = (institution *(";" body-function)) / office | |||
institution = alf-dot | institution = alf-dot | |||
body-function = alf-dot | body-function = alf-dot | |||
office = alf-dot | office = alf-dot | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the measure element | |||
; Structure of the measure element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
measure = measure-type *(";" specification) | measure = measure-type *(";" specification) | |||
measure-type = alf-dot | measure-type = alf-dot | |||
specification = alf-dot | specification = alf-dot | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the details element | |||
; Structure of the details element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
details = (dates / period) ";" numbers | details = (dates / period) ";" numbers | |||
dates = date *("," date) | dates = date *("," date) | |||
period = alf-dot | period = alf-dot | |||
numbers = (document-id *("," document-id)) / number-lex | numbers = (document-id *("," document-id)) / number-lex | |||
document-id = alf-dot-oth | document-id = alf-dot-oth | |||
number-lex = "lex-" 1*DIGIT | number-lex = "lex-" 1*DIGIT | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the annex element | |||
; Structure of the annex element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
annex = annex-id *(";" specification) | annex = annex-id *(";" specification) | |||
annex-id = alf-dot | annex-id = alf-dot | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the expression element | |||
; Structure of the expression element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
expression = version [":" language] | expression = version [":" language] | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the version element | |||
; Structure of the version element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
version = (amendment-date / specification) | version = (amendment-date / specification) | |||
*(";" (event-date / event)) | *(";" (event-date / event)) | |||
amendment-date = date | amendment-date = date | |||
event-date = date | event-date = date | |||
event = alf-dot | event = alf-dot | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the language element | |||
; Structure of the language element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
language = 2*3alfa *["-" extlang] / 4*8alfa | language = 2*3alfa *["-" extlang] / 4*8alfa | |||
extlang = 3alfa *2("-" 3alfa) | extlang = 3alfa *2("-" 3alfa) | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the manifestation element | |||
; Structure of the manifestation element<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
manifestation = format ":" editor | manifestation = format ":" editor | |||
[":" component [":" feature]] | [":" component [":" feature]] | |||
format = mime *(";" specification) | format = mime *(";" specification) | |||
mime = alf-dot-hyp | mime = alf-dot-hyp | |||
editor = publisher *(";" specification) | editor = publisher *(";" specification) | |||
publisher = alf-dot-hyp | publisher = alf-dot-hyp | |||
component = part *(";" specification) | component = part *(";" specification) | |||
part = alf-dot-hyp | part = alf-dot-hyp | |||
feature = attribute *(";" specification) | feature = attribute *(";" specification) | |||
attribute = alf-dot-hyp | attribute = alf-dot-hyp | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Structure of the date | |||
; Structure of the date<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
date = date-iso ["|" date-loc] | date = date-iso ["|" date-loc] | |||
date-iso = year "-" month "-" day | date-iso = year "-" month "-" day | |||
year = 4DIGIT | year = 4DIGIT | |||
month = 2DIGIT | month = 2DIGIT | |||
day = 2DIGIT | day = 2DIGIT | |||
date-loc = *(alfadot / other) | date-loc = *(alfadot / other) | |||
]]></artwork> | ||||
<t>;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
/> | ; Allowed, reserved, and future characters | |||
; Allowed, reserved and future characters<br/> | ;------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
;-------------------------------------------------------------------<br/> | ; - allowed = alfadot / other / reserved | |||
; - allowed = alfadot / other / reserved<br/> | ; - reserved = ":" / "@" / "$" / "+" / "|" / ";" / "," / "~" | |||
; - reserved = ":" / "@" / "$" / "+" / "|" / ";" / "," / "~"<br/> | ; - future = "*" / "!" | |||
; - future = "*" / "!"</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | ||||
alf-dot = alfanum *alfadot | alf-dot = alfanum *alfadot | |||
alf-dot-hyp = alfanum *(alfadot / "-") | alf-dot-hyp = alfanum *(alfadot / "-") | |||
alf-dot-oth = alfanum *(alfadot / other) | alf-dot-oth = alfanum *(alfadot / other) | |||
alfadot = alfanum / "." | alfadot = alfanum / "." | |||
alfa = lowercase / uppercase | alfa = lowercase / uppercase | |||
alfanum = alfa / DIGIT / encoded | alfanum = alfa / DIGIT / encoded | |||
skipping to change at line 1869 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2463 ¶ | |||
uppercase = %x41-5A ; upper-case ASCII letters (A-Z) | uppercase = %x41-5A ; upper-case ASCII letters (A-Z) | |||
DIGIT = %x30-39 ; decimal digits (0-9) | DIGIT = %x30-39 ; decimal digits (0-9) | |||
encoded = "%" 2HEXDIG | encoded = "%" 2HEXDIG | |||
HEXDIG = DIGIT / %x41-46 / %x61-66 ; hex digits (0-9,A-F,a-f) | HEXDIG = DIGIT / %x41-46 / %x61-66 ; hex digits (0-9,A-F,a-f) | |||
other = "-" / "_" / "'" / "=" / "(" / ")" | other = "-" / "_" / "'" / "=" / "(" / ")" | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></sourcecode> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="the-procedure-of-uniform-names-assignment"> | <section anchor="the-procedure-of-uniform-names-assignment"> | |||
<name>The Procedure of Uniform Names Assignment</name> | <name>Procedure of Uniform Names Assignment</name> | |||
<section anchor="specifying-the-jurisdiction-element-of-the-lex-identifier "> | <section anchor="specifying-the-jurisdiction-element-of-the-lex-identifier "> | |||
<name>Specifying the jurisdiction Element of the LEX Identifier</name> | <name>Specifying the Jurisdiction Element of the LEX Identifier</name> | |||
<t>Under the "lex" namespace, each country or international organization | <t>Under the "lex" namespace, each country or international organization | |||
is assigned with a jurisdiction code, which characterizes the URNs of | is assigned a jurisdiction code, which characterizes the URNs of | |||
the source of law of that country or jurisdiction. This code is | the source of law of that country or jurisdiction. | |||
assigned according to ccTLD (as well as TLDN (Top Level Domain Name) | This code is | |||
or DN (Domain Name) for the organizations) representation and it is | assigned according to ccTLD (as well as TLDN (Top-Level Domain Name) | |||
the value of the jurisdiction-code element, which preserves cross- | or DN (Domain Name) for organizations) representation, and it is | |||
country uniqueness of the identifiers.</t> | the value of the jurisdiction-code element, which preserves cross-country unique | |||
ness of the identifiers.</t> | ||||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="jurisdictional-registrar-for-names-assignment"> | <section anchor="jurisdictional-registrar-for-names-assignment"> | |||
<name>Jurisdictional Registrar for Names Assignment</name> | <name>Jurisdictional Registrar for Names Assignment</name> | |||
<t>Any country or jurisdiction, who intends to adopt this schema, MUST | <!-- [rfced] We have some questions about the text below. | |||
identify a Jurisdictional Registrar, an organization which shares and | ||||
a) The first sentence says a country or jurisdiction "MUST identify a | ||||
Jurisdictional Registrar" and the second sentence below says "It must appoint | ||||
a Jurisdictional Registrar". Is this redundant? | ||||
b) Please clarify the second sentence. Specifically, what should the | ||||
designated experts be informed about? What is meant by "together with the | ||||
registration of a jurisdiction code"? | ||||
Original: | ||||
Any country or jurisdiction, who intends to adopt this schema, MUST | ||||
identify a Jurisdictional Registrar, an organization which shares and | ||||
defines the structure of the optional part (jurisdiction-unit) of the | ||||
name, according to the organization of the state or institution (for | ||||
details see Section 2.2). It must appoint a Jurisdictional Registrar | ||||
and inform the Designed Experts, together with the registration of a | ||||
jurisdiction code. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>Any country or jurisdiction that intends to adopt this schema <bcp14> | ||||
MUST</bcp14> | ||||
identify a Jurisdictional Registrar, an organization that shares and | ||||
defines the structure of the optional part (jurisdiction-unit) of | defines the structure of the optional part (jurisdiction-unit) of | |||
the name, according to the organization of the state or institution | the name, according to the organization of the state or institution | |||
(for details see <xref target="jur-cod-regist"/>). It must appoint a Jurisdicti onal | (for details, see <xref target="jur-cod-regist"/>). It must appoint a Jurisdict ional | |||
Registrar and inform the Designed Experts, together with the | Registrar and inform the Designed Experts, together with the | |||
registration of a jurisdiction code. For example, in a federal state | registration of a jurisdiction code. For example, in a federal state, | |||
a jurisdiction-unit corresponding to the name of each member state<br/> | a jurisdiction-unit corresponding to the name of each member state | |||
(e.g. "br;sao.paulo", "br;minas.gerais", etc.) may be defined.</t> | (e.g., "br;sao.paulo", "br;minas.gerais", etc.) may be defined.</t> | |||
<t>The process of assigning the local-name is managed by each | <t>The process of assigning the local-name is managed by each | |||
specific country or jurisdiction under the related jurisdiction | specific country or jurisdiction under the related jurisdiction | |||
element.</t> | element.</t> | |||
<t>In any country the Jurisdictional Registrar shares and defines the | <t>In any country, the Jurisdictional Registrar shares and defines the | |||
assignment of the primary elements (issuing authority and type of | assignment of the primary elements (issuing authority and type of | |||
legal measure) of the local names considering the characteristics of | legal measure) of the local names considering the characteristics of | |||
its own state or institution organization.</t> | its own state or institution organization.</t> | |||
<t>Such a Registrar MUST establish, according to the guidelines | <t>The Jurisdictional Registrar <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> establish, according to the guidelines | |||
indicated in this document, a uniform procedure within the | indicated in this document, a uniform procedure within the | |||
country or organization to define local-name elements, to take | country or organization to define local-name elements, make | |||
decisions upon normalizations and finally to solve and avoid possible | decisions about normalizations, solve and avoid possible | |||
name collisions as well as to maintain authoritative registries of | name collisions, and maintain authoritative registries of | |||
various kinds (e.g., for authorities, types of measures, etc.). In | various kinds (e.g., for authorities, types of measures, etc.). In | |||
particular, accurate point-in-time representations of the structure | particular, accurate point-in-time representations of the structure | |||
and naming of government entities are important to semantically-aware | and naming of government entities are important to semantically aware | |||
applications in this domain.</t> | applications in this domain.</t> | |||
<t>Moreover, the Registrar shares and defines the rules to construct | <t>Moreover, the Jurisdictional Registrar shares and defines the rules t o construct | |||
partition IDs for each document type, possibly in accordance with | partition IDs for each document type, possibly in accordance with | |||
those already defined in other jurisdictions.</t> | those already defined in other jurisdictions.</t> | |||
<t>Finally, the Registrar will develop and publish the rules and the | <t>Finally, the Jurisdictional Registrar will develop and publish the ru | |||
guidelines for the local-name construction as well as the | les and | |||
predefined values and codes. The Registrar should also promote the | guidelines for the local-name construction as well as the predefined | |||
urn:lex identifier for the sources of law of its jurisdiction.</t> | values and codes. The Jurisdictional Registrar should also promote the u | |||
rn:lex | ||||
identifier for the sources of law of its jurisdiction.</t> | ||||
<t>Such a set of rules will have to be followed by all institutional | <t>Such a set of rules will have to be followed by all institutional | |||
bodies adopting the URN LEX identification system in a country or | bodies adopting the URN LEX identification system in a country or | |||
jurisdiction, as well as by private publishers, and each of them will | jurisdiction, as well as by private publishers. Each of them will | |||
be responsible for assigning names to their domains.</t> | be responsible for assigning names to their domains.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="identifier-uniqueness"> | <section anchor="identifier-uniqueness"> | |||
<name>Identifier Uniqueness</name> | <name>Identifier Uniqueness</name> | |||
<t>Identifiers in the "lex" namespace are defined through a | <t>Identifiers in the "lex" namespace are defined through a | |||
jurisdiction element assigned to the sources of law of a specific | jurisdiction element assigned to the sources of law of a specific | |||
country or organization, and a local-name assigned by the issuing | country or organization, and a local-name is assigned by the issuing | |||
authority, in conformance with the syntax defined in <xref target="creation"/>. | authority in conformance with the syntax defined in <xref target="creation"/>. T | |||
The | he | |||
main elements (authority and type of measure) of the local-name are | main elements (authority and type of measure) of the local-name are | |||
defined by the Jurisdictional Registrar, so that it is ensured that | defined by the Jurisdictional Registrar, so that it is ensured that | |||
the constructed URNs are unique. The Jurisdictional Registrar MUST | the constructed URNs are unique. The Jurisdictional Registrar <bcp14>MUST</bcp14 > | |||
provide clear documentation of rules by which names are to be | provide clear documentation of rules by which names are to be | |||
constructed, and MUST update and make accessible its registries.</t> | constructed and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> update its registries and make them accessib | |||
<t>Any enacting authority is responsible to define formal parameters to | le.</t> | |||
<t>Any enacting authority is responsible for defining formal parameters | ||||
to | ||||
guarantee local name uniqueness by attributing, if necessary, a | guarantee local name uniqueness by attributing, if necessary, a | |||
conventional internal number, which, combined with the other local- | conventional internal number, which when combined with the other local-name comp | |||
name components (authority, measure and date), builds a unique | onents (authority, measure, and date), builds a unique | |||
identifier. Uniqueness is achieved by checking against the catalogue | identifier. Uniqueness is achieved by checking against the catalogue | |||
of previously assigned names.</t> | of previously assigned names.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="identifier-persistence-considerations"> | <section anchor="identifier-persistence-considerations"> | |||
<name>Identifier Persistence Considerations</name> | <name>Identifier Persistence Considerations</name> | |||
<t>The persistence of identifiers depends on the durability of the | <t>The persistence of identifiers depends on the durability of the | |||
institutions that assign and administer them. The goal of the LEX | institutions that assign and administer them. The goal of the LEX | |||
schema is to maintain uniqueness and persistence of all resources | schema is to maintain uniqueness and persistence of all resources | |||
identified by the assigned URNs.</t> | identified by the assigned URNs.</t> | |||
<t>In particular, the CNR is responsible of maintaining | <t>In particular, CNR is responsible for maintaining | |||
the uniqueness of the jurisdiction element; given that the | the uniqueness of the jurisdiction element. Given that the | |||
jurisdiction is assigned on the basis of the long-held ccTLD | jurisdiction is assigned on the basis of the long-held ccTLD | |||
representation of the country (or the TLDN or DN of the organization) | representation of the country (or the TLDN or DN of the organization) | |||
and that the country or organization associated code is expected to | and that the associated code for country or organization is expected to | |||
continue indefinitely, the URN also persists indefinitely.</t> | continue indefinitely, the URN also persists indefinitely.</t> | |||
<t>The rules for the construction of the name are conceived to delegate | <t>The rules for the construction of the name are conceived to delegate | |||
the responsibility of their uniqueness to a set of authorities which | the responsibility of their uniqueness to a set of authorities that | |||
is identified within each country or organization.</t> | is identified within each country or organization.</t> | |||
<t>Therefore, each authority is responsible for assigning URNs which | <t>Therefore, each authority is responsible for assigning URNs that | |||
have a very long life expectancy and can be expected to remain unique | have a very long life expectancy and can be expected to remain unique | |||
for the foreseeable future. Practical and political considerations, | for the foreseeable future. Practical and political considerations, | |||
as well as diverse local forms of government organization, will | as well as diverse local forms of government organization, will | |||
result in different methods of assigning responsibility for different | result in different methods of assigning responsibility for different | |||
levels of the name.</t> | levels of the name.</t> | |||
<t>Where this cannot be accomplished by the implementation of an | <t>Where this cannot be accomplished by the implementation of an | |||
authoritative hierarchy, it is highly desirable that it be done by | authoritative hierarchy, it is highly desirable that it be done by | |||
creating consensus around a series of published rules for the | creating consensus around a series of published rules for the | |||
creation and administration of names by institutions and bodies that | creation and administration of names by institutions and bodies that | |||
operate by means of collaboration rather than compulsion.</t> | operate by means of collaboration rather than compulsion.</t> | |||
<t>Issuing authorities that operate in more localized scopes, ranging | <t>Issuing authorities that operate in more localized scopes, ranging | |||
from the national down to the very local, MUST equally take | from national scope down to very local scope, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> equally take | |||
responsibility for the persistence of identifiers within their scope.</t> | responsibility for the persistence of identifiers within their scope.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="recommendations-for-the-resolution-process"> | <section anchor="recommendations-for-the-resolution-process"> | |||
<name>Recommendations for the Resolution Process</name> | <name>Recommendations for the Resolution Process</name> | |||
<section anchor="the-general-architecture-of-the-system"> | <section anchor="the-general-architecture-of-the-system"> | |||
<name>The General Architecture of the System</name> | <name>General Architecture of the System</name> | |||
<t>The task of the resolution service is that of associating a LEX | <t>The task of the resolution service is to associate a LEX | |||
identifier with a specific document address on the Internet. By | identifier with a specific document address on the Internet. In | |||
contrast with systems that can be constructed around rigorous and | contrast with systems that can be constructed around rigorous and | |||
enforceable engineering premises, such as DNS, the "lex" namespace | enforceable engineering premises, such as DNS, the "lex" namespace | |||
resolver will be expected to cope with a wide variety of inputs | resolver will be expected to cope with a wide variety of inputs | |||
incomplete or partially incorrect, particularly those | that are incomplete or partially incorrect, particularly those | |||
created by the automated extraction of | created by the automated extraction of | |||
references from texts. In this document, | references from texts. In this document, | |||
the result is a particular emphasis on a flexible and robust resolver | the result is a particular emphasis on a flexible and robust resolver | |||
design.</t> | design.</t> | |||
<t>The system has a distributed architecture based on two fundamental | <t>The system has a distributed architecture based on two fundamental | |||
components: a chain of information in DNS (Domain Name System) and a | components: a chain of information in the DNS and a | |||
series of resolution services from URNs to URLs, each competent | series of resolution services from URNs to URLs, each competent | |||
within a specific domain of the namespace.</t> | within a specific domain of the namespace.</t> | |||
<t>The client retrieves the document associated with this URN using the | <t>The client retrieves the document associated with this URN using the | |||
procedure described in <xref target="RFC3404"/>, which starts with a DNS NAPTR | procedure described in <xref target="RFC3404"/>, which starts with a DNS NAPTR | |||
query.</t> | query.</t> | |||
<t>A resolution service can delegate the resolution and management of | <t>A resolution service can delegate the resolution and management of | |||
hierarchically-dependent portions of the name. | hierarchically dependent portions of the name. | |||
Delegation of this responsibility will not be unreasonably withheld | Delegation of this responsibility will not be unreasonably withheld | |||
provided that the processes for their resolution and management are | provided that the processes for their resolution and management are | |||
robust and are followed.</t> | robust and followed.</t> | |||
<t>For the "lex" namespace, CNR will maintain in the lex-nameserver.nic. | <!-- [rfced] Note that we added numbers to this sentence to aid in | |||
it | readability. Would updating "in correspondence with the adhesion" as | |||
(see <xref target="iana"/>) the root zone of the chain resolution (equivalent | suggested below further improve clarity? | |||
to "lex.urn.arpa", see <xref target="RFC3405"/>) and, in correspondence with the | ||||
adhesion (see <xref target="jur-cod-regist"/>) of a new country (e.g., "br") or | Original: | |||
organization, will update the DNS information with a new record to | For the "lex" namespace, CNR will maintain in the lex- | |||
delegate the relative resolution. This may be obtained by a regular | nameserver.nic.it (see Section 12) the root zone of the chain | |||
expression that matches the initial part of the URN (e.g., | resolution (equivalent to "lex.urn.arpa", see [RFC3405]) and, in | |||
"urn:lex:br") and redirects towards the proper zone (e.g., | correspondence with the adhesion (see Section 2.2) of a new country | |||
"lex.senado.gov.br").</t> | (e.g., "br") or organization, will update the DNS information with a | |||
new record to delegate the relative resolution. | ||||
Current: | ||||
For the "lex" namespace, CNR will 1) maintain the root zone of the | ||||
chain resolution, equivalent to "lex.urn.arpa" (see [RFC3405]), in | ||||
the lex-nameserver.nic.it (see Section 12) and 2) update the DNS | ||||
information with a new record to delegate the relative resolution in | ||||
correspondence with the adhesion (see Section 2.2) of a new country | ||||
(e.g., "br") or organization. | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
For the "lex" namespace, CNR will 1) maintain the root zone of the | ||||
chain resolution, equivalent to "lex.urn.arpa" (see [RFC3405]), in | ||||
the lex-nameserver.nic.it (see Section 12) and 2) update the DNS | ||||
information with a new record to delegate the relative resolution | ||||
when a new country (e.g., "br") or organization is added (see Section 2.2). | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Will readers understand what "This" refers to here? | ||||
Original: | ||||
This may be obtained | ||||
by a regular expression that matches the initial part of the URN | ||||
(e.g., "urn:lex:br") and redirects towards the proper zone (e.g., | ||||
"lex.senado.gov.br"). | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>For the "lex" namespace, CNR will 1) maintain the root zone of the | ||||
chain resolution, equivalent to "lex.urn.arpa" (see <xref | ||||
target="RFC3405"/>), in the lex-nameserver.nic.it (see <xref | ||||
target="iana"/>) and 2) update the DNS information with a new record | ||||
to delegate the relative resolution in correspondence with the | ||||
adhesion (see <xref target="jur-cod-regist"/>) of a new country (e.g., | ||||
"br") or organization. This may be obtained by a regular expression | ||||
that matches the initial part of the URN (e.g., "urn:lex:br") and | ||||
redirects towards the proper zone (e.g., "lex.senado.gov.br").</t> | ||||
<t>Likewise, the institution responsible for the jurisdiction uniform | <t>Likewise, the institution responsible for the jurisdiction uniform | |||
names (e.g., "urn:lex:br") has the task of managing the relative root | names (e.g., "urn:lex:br") has the task of managing the relative root | |||
in the DNS system (e.g., "lex.senado.gov.br" zone) and routing the | in the DNS system (e.g., "lex.senado.gov.br" zone) and routing the | |||
resolution towards its resolvers on the basis of parts of the uniform | resolution towards its resolvers on the basis of parts of the uniform | |||
names. In similar way it can delegate the resolution of | names. In a similar way, it can delegate the resolution of | |||
country/organization sub-levels (e.g., "urn:lex:br;sao.paolo") | country/organization sub-levels (e.g., "urn:lex:br;sao.paolo") | |||
towards the relative zone (e.g., "lex.sao-paolo.gov.br").</t> | towards the relative zone (e.g., "lex.sao-paolo.gov.br").</t> | |||
<t>Such DNS routing chain does not work for all the URN components | <t>Such a DNS routing chain does not work for all the URN components | |||
containing %-encoded characters. Therefore, when converting a "lex" URN | containing percent-encoded characters. Therefore, when converting a "lex" URN | |||
in UTF-8 code to a DNS query, clients MUST perform any necessary punycode | in UTF-8 code to a DNS query, clients <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> perform any necessary | |||
punycode | ||||
conversion <xref target="RFC5891"/> before sending the query.</t> | conversion <xref target="RFC5891"/> before sending the query.</t> | |||
<t>The resolution service is made up of two elements: a knowledge base | <t>The resolution service is made up of two elements: a knowledge base | |||
(consisting in a catalogue or a set of transformation rules) and a | (consisting in a catalogue or a set of transformation rules) and | |||
software to query the knowledge base itself.</t> | software to query the knowledge base.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="catalogues-for-resolution"> | <section anchor="catalogues-for-resolution"> | |||
<name>Catalogues for Resolution</name> | <name>Catalogues for Resolution</name> | |||
<t>Incompleteness and inaccuracy are rather frequent in legal citations, | <t>Incompleteness and inaccuracy are rather frequent in legal citations; | |||
and incomplete or inaccurate uniform names of the referred document | thus, incomplete or inaccurate uniform names of the referred document | |||
are thus likely to be built from textual references (this is even | are likely to be built from textual references (this is even | |||
more frequent if they are created automatically through a specific | more frequent if they are created automatically through a specific | |||
parser). For this reason, the implementation of a catalogue, based on | parser). For this reason, the implementation of a catalogue, based on | |||
a relational-database, is suggested, as it will lead to a higher | a relational database, is suggested, as it will lead to higher | |||
flexibility in the resolution process.</t> | flexibility in the resolution process.</t> | |||
<t>In addition the catalogue must manage the aliases, the various | <t>In addition, the catalogue must manage the aliases, the various | |||
versions and languages of the same source of law as well as the | versions and languages of the same source of law, and the | |||
related manifestations.</t> | related manifestations.</t> | |||
<t>It is suggested that each enacting authority implements its own | <t>It is suggested that each enacting authority implement its own | |||
catalogue, assigning a corresponding unambiguous uniform name to each | catalogue, assigning a corresponding unambiguous uniform name to each | |||
resource.</t> | resource.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="suggested-resolver-behaviour"> | <section anchor="suggested-resolver-behaviour"> | |||
<name>Suggested Resolver Behaviour</name> | <name>Suggested Resolver Behavior</name> | |||
<t>First, the resolver SHOULD separate the part corresponding to | <t>First, the resolver <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> separate the part correspon | |||
the partition ID, through the "~" separator, from the document name.</t> | ding to | |||
<t>The resolution process SHOULD implement a normalization of the | the partition ID from the document name, with the "~" separator.</t> | |||
<t>The resolution process <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> implement a normalizatio | ||||
n of the | ||||
uniform name to be resolved. This may involve transforming some | uniform name to be resolved. This may involve transforming some | |||
components to the canonical form (e.g., filling out the acronyms, | components to the canonical form (e.g., filling out the acronyms, | |||
expanding the abbreviations, unifying the institution names, | expanding the abbreviations, unifying the institution names, | |||
standardizing the type of measures, etc.). For this function | standardizing the type of measures, etc.). For this function, | |||
authorities and types of measure registers are useful.</t> | authorities and types of measure registers are useful.</t> | |||
<t>The resolver SHOULD then query the catalogue searching for the URN | <t>The resolver <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> then query the catalogue searching | |||
which corresponds exactly to the given one (normalized if necessary). | for the URN | |||
that corresponds exactly to the given one (normalized if necessary). | ||||
Since the names coming from the references may be inaccurate or | Since the names coming from the references may be inaccurate or | |||
incomplete, an iterative, heuristic approach (based on partial | incomplete, an iterative and heuristic approach (based on partial | |||
matches) is indicated. Incomplete | matches) is indicated. Incomplete | |||
references (not including all the elements to create the canonical | references (not including all the elements to create the canonical | |||
uniform name) are normal and natural; for a human reader, the | uniform name) are normal and natural; for a human reader, the | |||
reference would be "completed" by contextual understanding of the | reference would be "completed" by contextual understanding of the | |||
reference in the document in which it occurs.</t> | reference in the document in which it occurs.</t> | |||
<t>In this phase, the resolver should use the partition ID information | <t>In this phase, the resolver should use the partition ID information | |||
to retrieve, if it is possible, only the referred partition, | to retrieve, if it is possible, only the referred partition; | |||
otherwise to return the entire document.</t> | otherwise, the entire document is returned.</t> | |||
<t>Lacking more specific indications, the resolver SHOULD select the | <t>Lacking more specific indications, the resolver <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> | |||
best (most recent) version of the requested source of law, and | select the | |||
best (most recent) version of the requested source of law and | ||||
provide all the manifestations with their related items. | provide all the manifestations with their related items. | |||
A more specific indication in the uniform name to be resolved will, | A more specific indication in the uniform name to be resolved will, | |||
of course, result in a more selective retrieval, based on any | of course, result in a more selective retrieval, based on any | |||
suggested expression and/or manifestations components (e.g. date, | suggested expression and/or manifestations components (e.g., date, | |||
language, format, etc.).</t> | language, format, etc.).</t> | |||
<t>Finally, the resolver SHOULD append to URLs the "#" character | <!-- [rfced] We have updated the sentence below for ease of the reader. Please | |||
followed by partition ID, transforming it in a URI fragment for | let us know any objections. | |||
Original: | ||||
Finally, the resolver SHOULD append to URLs the "#" character | ||||
followed by partition ID, transforming it in a URI fragment for | ||||
browser pointing. | ||||
Current: | ||||
Finally, the resolver SHOULD append the "#" character followed by the | ||||
partition ID to URLs, to create URI fragments for browser pointing. | ||||
--> | ||||
<t>Finally, the resolver <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> append the "#" character | ||||
followed by the partition ID to URLs, to create URI fragments for | ||||
browser pointing.</t> | browser pointing.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="security-considerations"> | <section anchor="security-considerations"> | |||
<name>Security Considerations</name> | <name>Security Considerations</name> | |||
<t>Security considerations are those normally associated with the use and | <t>Security considerations are those normally associated with the use and | |||
resolution URNs in general. Additional security considerations concerning | resolution URNs in general. Additional security considerations concerning | |||
the authenticity of a document do not pertain to the LEX specifications, | the authenticity of a document do not pertain to the LEX specifications, | |||
but they pertain security and trust issues which can be addressed with other mea | but they pertain to security and trust issues that can be addressed with other m | |||
ns, | eans, | |||
like digital signature, data encryption, etc.</t> | like digital signatures, data encryption, etc.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="iana"> | <section anchor="iana"> | |||
<name>IANA Considerations</name> | <name>IANA Considerations</name> | |||
<t>IANA has already registered the "lex" namespace, according to the | <t>IANA has registered "lex" namespace in the | |||
template at section 2. Registration has been accomplished as the | "Formal URN Namespaces" registry <xref target="RFC8141"/>.</t> | |||
Formal URN Namespace registry described by <xref target="RFC8141"/>.</t> | <t>In addition, to activate a distributed resolution system, IANA has regi | |||
<t>In addition, to activate a distributed resolution system, the one-off | stered the following NAPTR record in the URN.ARPA domain:</t> | |||
registration of the following NAPTR record is requested | ||||
in the URN.ARPA domain:</t> | ||||
<artwork><![CDATA[ | <artwork><![CDATA[ | |||
lex.urn.arpa. | lex.urn.arpa. | |||
IN NAPTR 100 10 "" "" "" lex-nameserver.nic.it. | IN NAPTR 100 10 "" "" "" lex-nameserver.nic.it. | |||
]]></artwork> | ]]></artwork> | |||
<t>where lex-nameserver.nic.it indicates the server of CNR (see section 2. | <t>Note that lex-nameserver.nic.it indicates the CNR server (see <xref tar | |||
2) | get="jur-cod-regist"/>) | |||
that is responsible for the resolution of the "lex" namespace at the time of thi s writing.</t> | that is responsible for the resolution of the "lex" namespace at the time of thi s writing.</t> | |||
</section> | </section> | |||
<section anchor="acknowledgements"> | ||||
<name>Acknowledgements</name> | ||||
<t>The authors of this document wish to thank all the supporters for | ||||
giving suggestions and comments.</t> | ||||
<t>They are also grateful to the Legislative XML community <xref target="S | ||||
ART"/> for the | ||||
interesting discussions on this topic and to the Working Group | ||||
"Identification of the legal resources through URNs" of Italian | ||||
NormeInRete project for the provided guidance <xref target="SPIN"/>.</t> | ||||
<t>The authors owe a debt of gratitude to Tom Bruce, former director of th | ||||
e | ||||
Legal Information Institute of the Cornell University Law School, for | ||||
his contribution in revising this document and sharing fruitful | ||||
discussions which greatly improved the final draft. The authors wish | ||||
to specially thank Marc van Opijnen (Dutch Ministry of Security and | ||||
Justice) for his valuable comments on LEX specifications which | ||||
contributed to improve the final result, as well as for the common | ||||
work aimed to harmonize ECLI and LEX specifications. Thanks also to | ||||
Joao Alberto de Oliveira Lima, legislative system analyst of the | ||||
Brazilian Federal Senate, and to Attila Torcsvari, information | ||||
management consultant, for their detailed comments on the first | ||||
drafts of this document, which provided significant hints to the | ||||
final version of the standard, and to Robert Richards of the Legal | ||||
Information Institute (Cornell University Law School), promoter and | ||||
maintainer of the Legal Informatics Research social network, as well | ||||
as to the members of this network, for their valuable comments on | ||||
this proposal.</t> | ||||
<t>Finally, many thanks go to Loriana Serrotti who significantly | ||||
contributed to the first drafting of this document.</t> | ||||
</section> | ||||
</middle> | </middle> | |||
<back> | <back> | |||
<references anchor="sec-combined-references"> | <references> | |||
<name>References</name> | <name>References</name> | |||
<references anchor="sec-normative-references"> | <references anchor="sec-normative-references"> | |||
<name>Normative References</name> | <name>Normative References</name> | |||
<reference anchor="RFC2045" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2 | ||||
045" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2045.xml"> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.20 | |||
<front> | 45.xml"/> | |||
<title>Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.21 | |||
of Internet Message Bodies</title> | 19.xml"/> | |||
<author fullname="N. Freed" initials="N." surname="Freed"/> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.36 | |||
<author fullname="N. Borenstein" initials="N." surname="Borenstein"/ | 29.xml"/> | |||
> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.34 | |||
<date month="November" year="1996"/> | 04.xml"/> | |||
<abstract> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.34 | |||
<t>This initial document specifies the various headers used to des | 05.xml"/> | |||
cribe the structure of MIME messages. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.39 | |||
</abstract> | 86.xml"/> | |||
</front> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.52 | |||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2045"/> | 34.xml"/> | |||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2045"/> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.56 | |||
</reference> | 46.xml"/> | |||
<reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2 | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.58 | |||
119" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"> | 91.xml"/> | |||
<front> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.58 | |||
<title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</tit | 93.xml"/> | |||
le> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.58 | |||
<author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/> | 94.xml"/> | |||
<date month="March" year="1997"/> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.81 | |||
<abstract> | 26.xml"/> | |||
<t>In many standards track documents several words are used to sig | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.81 | |||
nify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. T | 41.xml"/> | |||
his document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.81 | |||
. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Co | 74.xml"/> | |||
mmunity, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t> | <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.82 | |||
</abstract> | 88.xml"/> | |||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC3629" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3 | ||||
629" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3629.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646</title> | ||||
<author fullname="F. Yergeau" initials="F." surname="Yergeau"/> | ||||
<date month="November" year="2003"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>ISO/IEC 10646-1 defines a large character set called the Univer | ||||
sal Character Set (UCS) which encompasses most of the world's writing systems. T | ||||
he originally proposed encodings of the UCS, however, were not compatible with m | ||||
any current applications and protocols, and this has led to the development of U | ||||
TF-8, the object of this memo. UTF-8 has the characteristic of preserving the fu | ||||
ll US-ASCII range, providing compatibility with file systems, parsers and other | ||||
software that rely on US-ASCII values but are transparent to other values. This | ||||
memo obsoletes and replaces RFC 2279.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="STD" value="63"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3629"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3629"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC3404" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3 | ||||
404" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3404.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Four: The Uni | ||||
form Resource Identifiers (URI)</title> | ||||
<author fullname="M. Mealling" initials="M." surname="Mealling"/> | ||||
<date month="October" year="2002"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>This document describes a specification for taking Uniform Reso | ||||
urce Identifiers (URI) and locating an authoritative server for information abou | ||||
t that URI. The method used to locate that authoritative server is the Dynamic D | ||||
elegation Discovery System. This document is part of a series that is specified | ||||
in "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive DDDS" | ||||
(RFC 3401). It is very important to note that it is impossible to read and unde | ||||
rstand any document in this series without reading the others. [STANDARDS-TRACK] | ||||
</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3404"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3404"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC3405" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3 | ||||
405" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3405.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Five: URI.ARP | ||||
A Assignment Procedures</title> | ||||
<author fullname="M. Mealling" initials="M." surname="Mealling"/> | ||||
<date month="October" year="2002"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>This document is fifth in a series that is completely specified | ||||
in "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive DDDS | ||||
" (RFC 3401). It is very important to note that it is impossible to read and und | ||||
erstand any document in this series without reading the others. This document sp | ||||
ecifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and reque | ||||
sts discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="65"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3405"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3405"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC3986" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3 | ||||
986" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3986.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax</title> | ||||
<author fullname="T. Berners-Lee" initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee | ||||
"/> | ||||
<author fullname="R. Fielding" initials="R." surname="Fielding"/> | ||||
<author fullname="L. Masinter" initials="L." surname="Masinter"/> | ||||
<date month="January" year="2005"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact sequence of ch | ||||
aracters that identifies an abstract or physical resource. This specification de | ||||
fines the generic URI syntax and a process for resolving URI references that mig | ||||
ht be in relative form, along with guidelines and security considerations for th | ||||
e use of URIs on the Internet. The URI syntax defines a grammar that is a supers | ||||
et of all valid URIs, allowing an implementation to parse the common components | ||||
of a URI reference without knowing the scheme-specific requirements of every pos | ||||
sible identifier. This specification does not define a generative grammar for UR | ||||
Is; that task is performed by the individual specifications of each URI scheme. | ||||
[STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="STD" value="66"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3986"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3986"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC5234" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5 | ||||
234" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5234.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF</title> | ||||
<author fullname="D. Crocker" initials="D." role="editor" surname="C | ||||
rocker"/> | ||||
<author fullname="P. Overell" initials="P." surname="Overell"/> | ||||
<date month="January" year="2008"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>Internet technical specifications often need to define a formal | ||||
syntax. Over the years, a modified version of Backus-Naur Form (BNF), called Au | ||||
gmented BNF (ABNF), has been popular among many Internet specifications. The cur | ||||
rent specification documents ABNF. It balances compactness and simplicity with r | ||||
easonable representational power. The differences between standard BNF and ABNF | ||||
involve naming rules, repetition, alternatives, order-independence, and value ra | ||||
nges. This specification also supplies additional rule definitions and encoding | ||||
for a core lexical analyzer of the type common to several Internet specification | ||||
s. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="STD" value="68"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5234"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5234"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC5646" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5 | ||||
646" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5646.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Tags for Identifying Languages</title> | ||||
<author fullname="A. Phillips" initials="A." role="editor" surname=" | ||||
Phillips"/> | ||||
<author fullname="M. Davis" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Dav | ||||
is"/> | ||||
<date month="September" year="2009"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>This document describes the structure, content, construction, a | ||||
nd semantics of language tags for use in cases where it is desirable to indicate | ||||
the language used in an information object. It also describes how to register v | ||||
alues for use in language tags and the creation of user-defined extensions for p | ||||
rivate interchange. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices f | ||||
or the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improveme | ||||
nts.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="47"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5646"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5646"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC5891" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5 | ||||
891" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5891.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protoc | ||||
ol</title> | ||||
<author fullname="J. Klensin" initials="J." surname="Klensin"/> | ||||
<date month="August" year="2010"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>This document is the revised protocol definition for Internatio | ||||
nalized Domain Names (IDNs). The rationale for changes, the relationship to the | ||||
older specification, and important terminology are provided in other documents. | ||||
This document specifies the protocol mechanism, called Internationalized Domain | ||||
Names in Applications (IDNA), for registering and looking up IDNs in a way that | ||||
does not require changes to the DNS itself. IDNA is only meant for processing do | ||||
main names, not free text. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5891"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5891"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC5893" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5 | ||||
893" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5893.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Right-to-Left Scripts for Internationalized Domain Names for | ||||
Applications (IDNA)</title> | ||||
<author fullname="H. Alvestrand" initials="H." role="editor" surname | ||||
="Alvestrand"/> | ||||
<author fullname="C. Karp" initials="C." surname="Karp"/> | ||||
<date month="August" year="2010"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>The use of right-to-left scripts in Internationalized Domain Na | ||||
mes (IDNs) has presented several challenges. This memo provides a new Bidi rule | ||||
for Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) labels, based on the | ||||
encountered problems with some scripts and some shortcomings in the 2003 IDNA Bi | ||||
di criterion. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5893"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5893"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC5894" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5 | ||||
894" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5894.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Backg | ||||
round, Explanation, and Rationale</title> | ||||
<author fullname="J. Klensin" initials="J." surname="Klensin"/> | ||||
<date month="August" year="2010"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>Several years have passed since the original protocol for Inter | ||||
nationalized Domain Names (IDNs) was completed and deployed. During that time, a | ||||
number of issues have arisen, including the need to update the system to deal w | ||||
ith newer versions of Unicode. Some of these issues require tuning of the existi | ||||
ng protocols and the tables on which they depend. This document provides an over | ||||
view of a revised system and provides explanatory material for its components. T | ||||
his document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published f | ||||
or informational purposes.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5894"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5894"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC8126" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8 | ||||
126" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs | ||||
</title> | ||||
<author fullname="M. Cotton" initials="M." surname="Cotton"/> | ||||
<author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/> | ||||
<author fullname="T. Narten" initials="T." surname="Narten"/> | ||||
<date month="June" year="2017"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use con | ||||
stants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in the | ||||
se fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their al | ||||
locations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, | ||||
that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).</t> | ||||
<t>To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance des | ||||
cribing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as whe | ||||
n and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document | ||||
defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification | ||||
authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Consideratio | ||||
ns is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of | ||||
a registry.</t> | ||||
<t>This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 52 | ||||
26.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="26"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8126"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8126"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC8141" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8 | ||||
141" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8141.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Uniform Resource Names (URNs)</title> | ||||
<author fullname="P. Saint-Andre" initials="P." surname="Saint-Andre | ||||
"/> | ||||
<author fullname="J. Klensin" initials="J." surname="Klensin"/> | ||||
<date month="April" year="2017"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>A Uniform Resource Name (URN) is a Uniform Resource Identifier | ||||
(URI) that is assigned under the "urn" URI scheme and a particular URN namespace | ||||
, with the intent that the URN will be a persistent, location-independent resour | ||||
ce identifier. With regard to URN syntax, this document defines the canonical sy | ||||
ntax for URNs (in a way that is consistent with URI syntax), specifies methods f | ||||
or determining URN-equivalence, and discusses URI conformance. With regard to UR | ||||
N namespaces, this document specifies a method for defining a URN namespace and | ||||
associating it with a namespace identifier, and it describes procedures for regi | ||||
stering namespace identifiers with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA | ||||
). This document obsoletes both RFCs 2141 and 3406.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8141"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8141"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8 | ||||
174" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</ti | ||||
tle> | ||||
<author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/> | ||||
<date month="May" year="2017"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protoco | ||||
l specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that | ||||
only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="RFC8288" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8 | ||||
288" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8288.xml"> | ||||
<front> | ||||
<title>Web Linking</title> | ||||
<author fullname="M. Nottingham" initials="M." surname="Nottingham"/ | ||||
> | ||||
<date month="October" year="2017"/> | ||||
<abstract> | ||||
<t>This specification defines a model for the relationships betwee | ||||
n resources on the Web ("links") and the type of those relationships ("link rela | ||||
tion types").</t> | ||||
<t>It also defines the serialisation of such links in HTTP headers | ||||
with the Link header field.</t> | ||||
</abstract> | ||||
</front> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8288"/> | ||||
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8288"/> | ||||
</reference> | ||||
<reference anchor="ISO.8601.1988" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/ rfc/bibxml2/reference.ISO.8601.1988.xml"> | <reference anchor="ISO.8601.1988" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/ rfc/bibxml2/reference.ISO.8601.1988.xml"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Data elements and interchange formats - Information interchan ge - Representation of dates and times</title> | <title>Data elements and interchange formats - Information interchan ge - Representation of dates and times</title> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>International Organization for Standardization</orga nization> | <organization>ISO</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date month="June" year="1988"/> | <date month="June" year="1988"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ISO" value="Standard 8601"/> | <seriesInfo name="ISO" value="8601:1988"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="W3C.HTML" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/html/" xml:ba se="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml4/reference.W3C.HTML.xml"> | <reference anchor="W3C.HTML" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/html/" xml:ba se="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml4/reference.W3C.HTML.xml"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>HTML</title> | <title>HTML</title> | |||
<author/> | <author/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="W3C REC" value="html"/> | <seriesInfo name="W3C REC" value="HTML"/> | |||
<seriesInfo name="W3C" value="html"/> | <seriesInfo name="W3C" value="HTML"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
</references> | </references> | |||
<references anchor="sec-informative-references"> | <references anchor="sec-informative-references"> | |||
<name>Informative References</name> | <name>Informative References</name> | |||
<reference anchor="FRAN"> | <reference anchor="FRAN"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Technologies for European Integration. Standards-based Inter operability of Legal Information Systems</title> | <title>Technologies for European Integration. Standards-based Inter operability of Legal Information Systems</title> | |||
<author initials="E." surname="Francesconi" fullname="Enrico Frances coni"> | <author initials="E." surname="Francesconi" fullname="Enrico Frances coni"> | |||
<organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | <organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2007"/> | <date year="2007"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-88-8398-050-3"/> | <seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-88-8398-050-3"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
skipping to change at line 2359 ¶ | skipping to change at line 2812 ¶ | |||
<reference anchor="FRAN"> | <reference anchor="FRAN"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Technologies for European Integration. Standards-based Inter operability of Legal Information Systems</title> | <title>Technologies for European Integration. Standards-based Inter operability of Legal Information Systems</title> | |||
<author initials="E." surname="Francesconi" fullname="Enrico Frances coni"> | <author initials="E." surname="Francesconi" fullname="Enrico Frances coni"> | |||
<organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | <organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2007"/> | <date year="2007"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-88-8398-050-3"/> | <seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-88-8398-050-3"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="FRBR" target="https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/catal oguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf"> | <reference anchor="FRBR" target="https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/catal oguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records</title> | <title>Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records</title> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization/> | <organization>International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date>n.d.</date> | <date month="February" year="2009"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="HCPIL" target="https://assets.hcch.net/docs/b093f152- a4b3-4530-949e-65c1bfc9cda1.pdf"> | <reference anchor="HCPIL" target="https://assets.hcch.net/docs/b093f152- a4b3-4530-949e-65c1bfc9cda1.pdf"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>The Hague Conference on Private International Law "Access to Foreign Law in Civil and Commercial Matters. Conclusions and Recommendations"</t itle> | <title>Access to Foreign Law in Civil and Commercial Matters</title> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>The European Commission</organization> | <organization>The European Commission</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2012"/> | <date month="February" year="2012"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<refcontent>The Hague Conference on Private International Law</refconte nt> | ||||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="ISBD"> | <reference anchor="ISBD"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>International Standard Bibliographic Description - Consolidat ed Edition.</title> | <title>ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description – Cons olidated Edition</title> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>The Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Secti on Berlin/Munich\: De Gruyter Saur</organization> | <organization>The Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Secti on Berlin/Munich: De Gruyter Saur</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2011"/> | <date year="2011"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-3-11-026379-4"/> | <seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-3-11-026379-4"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="ISO3166-1"> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] FYI - We alphabetized the references as that seemed to be the | ||||
intent (only two were out of order). | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Please confirm the correct version of the following reference | ||||
(2006, 2013, or 2020) and let us know how we should update. | ||||
Original: | ||||
[ISO3166-1] | ||||
International Organization for Standardization, "Codes for | ||||
the representation of names of countries and their | ||||
subdivisions - Part 1: Country codes". | ||||
Perhaps (a): | ||||
[ISO.3166-1] | ||||
ISO, "Codes for the representation of names of countries | ||||
and their subdivisions - Part 1: Country codes", | ||||
ISO 3166-1:2006, 2006. | ||||
Perhaps (b): | ||||
[ISO.3166-1] | ||||
ISO, "Codes for the representation of names of countries | ||||
and their subdivisions - Part 1: Country codes", | ||||
ISO 3166-1:2013, 2013. | ||||
Perhaps (c): | ||||
[ISO.3166-1] | ||||
ISO, "Codes for the representation of names of countries | ||||
and their subdivisions - Part 1: Country code", | ||||
ISO 3166-1:2020, 2020. | ||||
--> | ||||
<reference anchor="ISO.3166-1"> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions -- Part 1: Country codes</title> | <title>Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions - Part 1: Country codes</title> | |||
<author> | <author> | |||
<organization>International Organization for Standardization</orga nization> | <organization>ISO</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date/> | <date/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="LVI"> | <reference anchor="LVI"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Law via the Internet. Free Access, Quality of Information, Ef fectiveness of Rights</title> | <title>Law via the Internet. Free Access, Quality of Information, Ef fectiveness of Rights</title> | |||
<author initials="G." surname="Peruginelli" fullname="Ginevra Perugi nelli" role="editor"> | <author initials="G." surname="Peruginelli" fullname="Ginevra Perugi nelli" role="editor"> | |||
<organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | <organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author initials="M." surname="Ragona" fullname="Mario Ragona" role= "editor"> | <author initials="M." surname="Ragona" fullname="Mario Ragona" role= "editor"> | |||
<organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | <organization>European Press Academic Publishing</organization> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2008"/> | <date month="April" year="2009"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="9788883980589"/> | <seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="9788883980589"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="SART"> | <reference anchor="SART"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>Legislative XML for the Semantic Web. Principles, Models, Sta ndards for Document Management, Law, Governance and Technology Series</title> | <title>Legislative XML for the Semantic Web: Principles, Models, Sta ndards for Document Management</title> | |||
<author initials="G." surname="Sartor" fullname="Giovanni Sartor"> | <author initials="G." surname="Sartor" fullname="Giovanni Sartor"> | |||
<organization/> | <organization/> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author initials="M." surname="Palmirani" fullname="Monica Palmirani "> | <author initials="M." surname="Palmirani" fullname="Monica Palmirani "> | |||
<organization/> | <organization/> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author initials="E." surname="Francesconi" fullname="Enrico Frances coni"> | <author initials="E." surname="Francesconi" fullname="Enrico Frances coni"> | |||
<organization/> | <organization/> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<author initials="M." surname="Biasiotti" fullname="Maria Angela Bia sotti"> | <author initials="M." surname="Biasiotti" fullname="Maria Angela Bia sotti"> | |||
<organization/> | <organization/> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2011"/> | <date year="2011"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-94-007-1887-6"/> | <seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="978-94-007-1887-6"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<!-- [rfced] We were unable to locate the reference listed below. Please | ||||
review the reference entry and confirm it is correct. | ||||
Original: | ||||
[SPIN] Spinosa, P., "The Assignment of Uniform Names to Italian | ||||
Legal Documents, URN-NIR 1.4", ITTIG technical Report n. | ||||
8/2010., June 2020. | ||||
--> | ||||
<reference anchor="SPIN"> | <reference anchor="SPIN"> | |||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>The Assignment of Uniform Names to Italian Legal Documents, U RN-NIR 1.4</title> | <title>The Assignment of Uniform Names to Italian Legal Documents, U RN-NIR 1.4</title> | |||
<author initials="P." surname="Spinosa" fullname="PierLuigi Spinosa" > | <author initials="P." surname="Spinosa" fullname="PierLuigi Spinosa" > | |||
<organization/> | <organization/> | |||
</author> | </author> | |||
<date year="2020" month="June"/> | <date year="2020" month="June"/> | |||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="ITTIG" value="technical Report n. 8/2010."/> | <seriesInfo name="ITTIG" value="technical Report n. 8/2010"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
<reference anchor="W3C.rdf-schema" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sch | ||||
ema/" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml4/reference.W3C.rdf-schema | <reference anchor="W3C.RDF-SCHEMA" target="https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sch | |||
.xml"> | ema/" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml4/reference.W3C.rdf-schema | |||
.xml"> | ||||
<front> | <front> | |||
<title>RDF Schema 1.1</title> | <title>RDF Schema 1.1</title> | |||
<author/> | <author fullname="Dan Brickley" role="editor"/> | |||
<author fullname="R.V. Guha" role="editor"/> | ||||
<date year="2014" month="February"/> | ||||
</front> | </front> | |||
<seriesInfo name="W3C REC" value="rdf-schema"/> | <seriesInfo name="W3C REC" value="rdf-schema"/> | |||
<seriesInfo name="W3C" value="rdf-schema"/> | <seriesInfo name="W3C" value="rdf-schema"/> | |||
</reference> | </reference> | |||
</references> | </references> | |||
</references> | </references> | |||
<?line 2288?> | <section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgements"> | |||
<name>Acknowledgements</name> | ||||
<t>The authors wish to thank all those who provided | ||||
suggestions and comments.</t> | ||||
<t>The authors are grateful to the Legislative XML community <xref | ||||
target="SART"/> for the interesting discussions on this topic and to the | ||||
Working Group "Identification of the legal resources through URNs" of the | ||||
Italian NormeInRete project for the guidance provided <xref | ||||
target="SPIN"/>.</t> | ||||
<t>The authors owe a debt of gratitude to <contact fullname="Tom | ||||
Bruce"/>, former director of the Legal Information Institute of the | ||||
Cornell University Law School, for his contribution in revising this | ||||
document and sharing fruitful discussions that greatly improved the | ||||
document. The authors wish to specially thank <contact | ||||
fullname="Marc van Opijnen"/> (Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice) | ||||
for his valuable comments on LEX specifications, which contributed to | ||||
improving this document, as well as for the common work aimed to | ||||
harmonize the ECLI and LEX specifications. Thanks also to <contact | ||||
fullname="Joao Alberto de Oliveira Lima"/>, Legislative System Analyst | ||||
of the Brazilian Federal Senate, and to <contact fullname="Attila | ||||
Torcsvari"/>, Information Management Consultant, for their detailed | ||||
comments on the first draft versions of this document, which provided | ||||
significant improvements to the final document. Thanks also to <contact | ||||
fullname="Robert Richards"/> of the Legal Information Institute (Cornell | ||||
University Law School), promoter and maintainer of the Legal Informatics | ||||
Research social network, as well as to the members of this network, for | ||||
their valuable comments on this document.</t> | ||||
<t>Finally, many thanks go to <contact fullname="Loriana Serrotti"/>, who | ||||
significantly contributed to the first draft versions of this document.</t | ||||
> | ||||
</section> | ||||
</back> | <!-- [rfced] Please review each instance of U+ notation and let us know if | |||
<!-- ##markdown-source: | you would like to replace with the character itself. | |||
H4sIAAAAAAAAA8y9aXMb2ZUm/P3+ihxUVxgoAxBXLeSow5QoVdEhqTSkZPeM | ||||
Xe9EEkiCaQFIODNBiqVW//Y5z1nukgBVKtvV8VbYFAnkcpdzz36eMxqNnGvL | The <u> element (which can be used to provide the U+ notation) is only | |||
dl4cZSfZ+2V5VdWL7LxoqnU9KbI3+aLI+u/P3wz412aV04d0SXbB3zdZdZW9 | required for cases where the non-ASCII characters are needed for correct | |||
ym+z/qsX/zFw02qypKuOsmmdX7WjZlUuqyYfrevlaF58HO0duPzysi5ujjJ6 | protocol operation. | |||
Yka3fPGhrlzVR1lbr5t2b2fnyc6em+TtUVYuryrXrC8XZdOU1bK9WxX4cFqs | ||||
CvqxbJ3L1+11VR+5LBvR/+m/ctkcZW/H2YUMSD6Ukb4ti/rVupyV6ZdNWxcF | For more information, please see: | |||
vexPZZ79n3yZ19NiPi+H2e6hfD8p27uj7GVZF8ufC/2oWi/bmj49a/P5nX02 | https://authors.ietf.org/en/non-ascii-characters-in-rfcxml | |||
pXcc7uzuP5QPVtfVkj75/f6TbJ/+f/hw92DnUL8rFnk5P8pWNKI5RjTW9fvD | https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#nonascii | |||
DF+MJ9WiM6MX4+xlnS9pxSbVsoxn9WJZl5PKvi3C11U9O6JFb2nh8jm2ucjr | ||||
yXX2nMY+KedYeB591n/+5nywuRTT4nfZs7xeTya0Fns7nUnuPfpVixOtxc7h | For examples from published RFCs, please see (search for "non-ASCII"): | |||
YXaw/+TJYbISBc9ifBXm+IfJsh6XbWcdno+zV+tVFS/A87wt6nKZR1/E87jI | https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=v3_feature_usage | |||
l9nL/LLMlxXN4zCex87O7sNkk8+rRf5Vk9jff7z3cH9v/+BxMouJDmU8p6FE | ||||
e+mWdNJoJ24KUOr5y+d7OweH9uvu7hP9df/hnv/1YOcg/GrX7j95/FB/PaSX | ||||
268PD/ynj5/shl/3w6927ePdvYf+14Nd/+sjf8He48f49ezix/Hjhzu7490n | ||||
8sGf95+Pf3j3+tWRcziW0Xxenp+8OeJ1UOby77Io2bticr2s5tWspIOOQ/9i | ||||
XVergjbkbNkWs5ppc5xlF22+nNK5a0aXeVNM9W5cg8tr2rw5bQ+zimJGtHxm | ||||
76+W2cVd0xaLhu8JzAD/KdmEE7RxgO45Q8kFfIr8uN/WRdNkJ5N8WizKSfZ2 | ||||
fTkvm+tyOePrp7T9R3RWduRwNEQLRYPFsiGdXTx7c5Q9efR49Jj+R7s52jnc | ||||
Ge3zGj47T9bwJZ1Sf3T/vqYDtiCGJ8v4rKTXVrR+q2saxDmdeVo7uTmvZyD8 | ||||
67ZdNUcPHtze3o7Lq3k+pmk8uCrnRfMgb5qibR4Qqea0M2sa+4Or+rLmH/+X | ||||
xv54vJpe0cN+eP727NXWbc3eXRfZD/lsXRAzWV4VdPaJqVdYnfKGlkB2bmmc | ||||
BzKjdzKhhW3sAS2tdVUX5WzJ35bL7Hl5QzyJyIAeuVgU9aSkO1/nLT2oGdtt | ||||
9LbJfA1J0PClmDldTLSDVzW9LUTA24fx+i3E80WcbF0xWZ7x9WRyPV4W7QOS | ||||
c82Dy50n+1e7h3uj/OByf3RwuL8zenLwpBg9PJzsXl5Nnkym+a4uW6CC3T0+ | ||||
Rs9Oty5iukZ2Ajpbe0rEWJcrJnQjZ1qEppqXeMs0ezEt9Qzhv/vm7zeOV4Lf | ||||
RdsuK0ErXOBktfTN2ctXJ2CnRhjZRcE06G9/RuKqXD54vV6Wk+u/HtH4su/r | ||||
9R3NhNjsuk6nv/uLh2B/tLs72iFG+ujJ6EB4zv7uw4ej3a0r9px4ttA/xloX | ||||
KzqLdCSEDdAMcJRZnxDeDZ4DIqGLy1ofQarElAhNKGg0yt7mdZvtHrFMJG7P | ||||
YmEbK+msYrp3P9azfFn+LONg1UY3Uz+LVmX3yaNHpFg8eQIG8epPZ1vniRNx | ||||
Q4KLd4TfVLSQ/rRPcoqG2f9a58YRI1441Ae8uLrCvt0USzAruua8nF23X8Ei | ||||
vx9nb4t6PSuX0IA6PPJ7+vSmzrdeUVeYQEHEWNX+w1/DOTeG8nqcneczWt/O | ||||
KF7ndVl1v/qnX+8Z9+Nfoln6j9j2DklU+ubi5Pzd9i0sZmUzZwGZ/cfrV55o | ||||
L0hPWLb0/j8Xl2OwS9LEVsSUbedeE/3NaX+9QOQ7T6vJGsyfJr/MZywHhqAS | ||||
u+v76gbkCCYMgvdS947eh4l81cZf0FGIVs/2vLrJl8sy/XZzq97m80VJwrNL | ||||
M69Jkk7yja83JPNWyfsLonlzFM/KnE52226Mgmgmz06Ws2Ke80X+ms2NjrjT | ||||
k4MRSfLR7uPHj0YPN1nbxduze7Qe2ugTEjCzJW8anT8ztdgCgvCDUkkKqaoz | ||||
tr+eDMhiGr05O892xwdb9k4tnMSG+aKFs4Wc3707+57sLVAKbRBUjFVFrJAE | ||||
yeMHNL+dcTTfP66XBSwAtgGgBdbTq1EzuSZaxvPciBhpfkkqdz4hg+zdddlk | ||||
U6PYKQuwS7DirzM43RnsuvKKJsK0X8qfd3RSh5gk/5vz6uJXB4Jf4FhAXJGu | ||||
2JSkDtKLa31JA+UCR2/OSz0lBb+EuMQwXbMqJvSqibBuGvdK2AIJVtqkfD6v | ||||
brN8Wq1MwuQZ9A36ncjwBuMi5n55ly3W8xbHOPvbui6backyk/f5Kp9AdYVO | ||||
VJBmi2fUhSlMGHouahFd+ksDloXdGDERUWQPZ8FWxuvxGFLplQDGmTtrcc+y | ||||
amkqjfKYIQ9kWhXyxXVOPAs30hxJvDbrxmsHL969HDve7kU5nc4L50g81dV0 | ||||
LUrC0+g/0EFBXLZeVTLtYPz35sXHHp7yhf/k9lW4He/nG0XK84NKXmKhBZoP | ||||
6SR/XxeuDPRT4uNbElSjaXFFEmuaiajEbUah9Ixr+iSvi6zxHgk3z2/HEPP0 | ||||
Jb2FVqItPhLP7YVLMrqkR28gfXSKrbxztl9K+bcl3Ss7KXvIN5lcIGFNxiLN | ||||
jR6D9Xf5lEi7xCFioUFHid5SE1XM1nI9bd/bCqQNxTgdatbny9dEAiJmVnU1 | ||||
UdGPr4OCQKuVkTE1bwY8Yx0+vb3hdRpnvVc2C1KglkVvKMuDpabnXlZT1jk+ | ||||
LKvbeTGdFaZgkS7fgo/widIBZ+3dinmLzBujnlxX87xusn4xno0z0d1J/76D | ||||
7fC39XQmki1zfI5WNQ0N56Qubsridti5PllKuu5uMidJT4eP/mDlb5g5Oqqi | ||||
StMfJMDKyVyO1yKf5T/T9Ohj4h2kS9EvRTsZDzDR4uNqXk6Ipd/xeZhAuBbT | ||||
sZBkTF1MGJOCtmtKG6IL1fKntI9yKDI5mrQVyzmG7fRktSoZhDyUZOjmYn7F | ||||
a4o341nVckQKN63zTV7O1Q4e4hu3ur5reHnn1cQ21zOUbEGKxDjrjlieD67B | ||||
h4Y2nrgXhhAzLhuWv3HqR0hn4gXxPTpVfsyYtTOeIoOcwxbkUS9yGixpjUVN | ||||
D5yz5srsJWd/IPyCYXS6wHTG+Qu6NbsssnVDr88hPW7pA2aTqvYHRkr0hBO0 | ||||
ICLMZqTz1sS477AadyBBZbpCKUT2RBOz7AZaJHG29DyPiZ+BodqiF8ubsq6W | ||||
/jhHPHqKo1permGDySOn5RWPp3W3xaUXJDVNWafUOBUoWVMuiMR4ZWfz6pL2 | ||||
sISaT2SxLPwWpOyEji3JGVJkGwc5tG6JpeDdGNGc/iIJoUsq9EfDw0MigQji | ||||
cEYro1hmhD0QgwmcYcXHhU5yPb9ztAlX63l2e10wPyMziRbpEtu7ohOHwVfg | ||||
VURUFZntGBavFr+sooc268k1WMwP7969pSG+Ilb2mjYLB2sYhj0tWiKfxh4e | ||||
dt5vNMTkpC4gTfEocRZ15/hLU3SfPqkj7fNnorln+eTDrCbzb+pS8bMhbFn+ | ||||
i5CJDxWUlM5euasKO42xL9eLS7qI7iXuTqwbzN1LeLp/Pt3ca7fwaj4N8KIE | ||||
DyTTZFeEsGqOovMLw2yvaQKza/7e+3ufF6ApDM/F7rLIONBRsCk0yU4iAQRm | ||||
gq9eyyfg+e6P64YoQjj+8zfnWR8XfIV7eQBptCDJNWXe94ZGUpwtz4uWxdTf | ||||
iODHdCEdb1qucoE9b0FRrFZAp2tiU8ilB1bVS9HPMDDbF92ydYMnwADDl0Rl | ||||
TjRe2sKGlvZHGlCdeTu+s0NiOvqxgMknVhnd7OL3BzGnY/z0CY5RojK4LubE | ||||
GCtZ28ZdFu1tQYdpFm2iH0ZtK0l6PlkWxGIaZu2OaO8GtN6ycGNGanqNvxlz | ||||
TYd5L22xMgCpj39ZnS+23dFZ07H7cd029BnmK0s0BEMjxl8nKyiMfjqF3Y21 | ||||
00toz0lALHAM/epcQEKIokCL2hQpRyJuJAcde8yyQWyPMdRPEgnT/O53TVZG | ||||
NA42VLR3sSokJLOqSH5CaA75mpwdjg4hkwpOgTI4pcPs6KyR4UKfLAo+yg20 | ||||
+SZeOxACHVJiTExunadgELdVPZ+ObrFqsrggR/9aP0SHuU5yodo8I7Z0aw+k | ||||
VcSxIOVkcp0v2diRJ0XzdpFa1gaSYBWNrOdm5D+a04LP6QRA4NpbiJTLWkJz | ||||
JJ7qClrN39XNFBSLMrji+f0uXvdcxZooi8tCFG4Zf+zHF4G5eX8jrnx6VV2R | ||||
DuOHewn2nIsJc2ImWKzXO6EIkRkkJMxo7Mh3ZS2R644XQswohy0Q7Zo0jBou | ||||
dzpqxdYZMOnppkB4rBpT9xsl5eCClHMwJ+og3Zl0Sz0P4pUsWRFUa40tTagH | ||||
10QHUClJsOOrDvV7FiZGYbTQ28QTzbyzCDTKoKu8eJ+9Frq+YLoehrfRfJcR | ||||
L2EagG5HIwV50DvIaLmBV2YKdROUUspbPOu4JvWrhi71gc32a1gf4HthGcql | ||||
C0u2jBQ6sM9Xfzr7/HkAzSd29t4U3iIV0aVM9cerK8gn/apzePs/vh0MRS3B | ||||
tyRpmB+wZIIT8B4aTQ6Rf6QxZjbBo/On9DvOLpTZsX1QL5UIeOp1XmLel3cd | ||||
ShQycnqHqVBXcPqqSk/rvnHkh2aAwStLrB1b+mxNtLa2dfh1YZpPnzjq8/mz | ||||
Y2uGbiDaIXkh1MHu8lI8WD2h1mWxbrF5i6K9rqbifS+9S94xleuwFxwbZVtL | ||||
7E5wHbvPG+GkAZTrxUifO3RKarV9ImI+Hvj8zjReKEy9Mcz23OSNmxJTE50a | ||||
q/H8xRuid1JLSCUPwgoMYEGvYddSG/aZucOQtM5bPgFsq4HhlEEftPOhGjx4 | ||||
c2FeBhxJPXtOzl488zqNXfHV8nSmOzi6IjcT1hyruVAzic88PXTjwDfxa/2R | ||||
Z09B0OmDSKHtqLINN4V5JsbsJqPbXT4hPYRW+qqYe9fGZUUUqtwYb1HyH8JQ | ||||
YEEGqYs9hYDkR/NVMjSh3AlH/ZKbMYKaHRmVbb44uUSqFtPoPOgroPXH3oAg | ||||
m2ExwC/5QUNG6kq5LlfgRKKE8apm6rbkYcKyJx6cT0CwP4uVnGfXJanYUxqE | ||||
xMuu6FwsfPiJ7vLunC0ibehur0tS6dbNmgl2jiFtlSpbmNdQ3XGLBe12exez | ||||
H+UsSHcwqeK8OKCDSKNfgqdDpWAVY4gR3rFZSovbFLStlZp9cMDw2Sb1lF5G | ||||
RxEGdX6LHYR1Lx6Mq6wvR4r+IPMP7JeEwiAjQcIETiYxE5VT/mOWdiRyWUc2 | ||||
VhmrIKR3VHXLcQwiV38HDawkZa22JAJm4PJqO4jP/eJgA8iWcH5JlLjVUI6U | ||||
shAaIiO3zM1X/yT745rmxrEg5RoIL9ld8ahmhT3dP0vHahOEiFZhMBd9NDKP | ||||
togpSEh2481ZrWfNMl6UjDWj0aWckHAQ/KiMCNNDkGhjbeO5VtnoiaFpwMfG | ||||
PG3bWSMxjYSgCVxrJOh/xjfE7Ug/mrQkbsbeVcpPwfv+XNUQ+iwy2F/HjkV3 | ||||
mrc5yR9WePF1vxiR3BnYcnx5dXCs8GbX5s0HkZiYfNOup6rsV6ahGq2IKsu8 | ||||
NFo594WVI5LMeeRE85E+UUuARP5yyezI+ggDGm6dx3ssHnEyJkckuOGYFWoS | ||||
FqLbrSU8MgyzFhryNN8xbumIeJbTf/H81VkU7XxOX2BhsxBNGfAh15dkp9Cc | ||||
lu45HXF1ozQFz44Eck4iKVc58+UNKZc3ZSt0mqqRmJ43nNOAxjaFP3n0q8DK | ||||
42BQ/8WrswGkBmdq6KDjeCqJjRI+j64XwEXL2Bk/ViQddyRHdAXgn4r06T5L | ||||
THZJ1cZd4B0vPrY4cj1cjhBFD75kFxzERGqX3j1JihU7bJqK7UevUGezdTmV | ||||
OG6rTL8ujJN6VQOjbtbQdjHf7IqUGTPLIBPhU4C/FM8D9y3YXGOx0HRDaohx | ||||
JcEm8zZCizcjAWeEDvnQYV4QXiG4LUGMkQYxsi1BjNjVV7ZOnXuFZSjQ49ho | ||||
U5UiJwWDzqfcnrhfoVK4MKTgX836K3FgYQAr0WwH7ES0RRUltLoleuVMMVbc | ||||
Ok6OfhTmqFUhZM2F3cFwddLBKZpEs80axC/TBw3gsYvdhiJbmztSFD5m9Xqu | ||||
Ga8pUUUuT8f0hW2KyHxDHZSNXhW8btGy1HGmWLnccuRi/w/eUnyE1V4EGUGj | ||||
I52CaWOZjLGCdZ+bKxzXvyLDju74EYYiGDvpa5bQMO4Ggps1SezCIm6FjZTn | ||||
Vtj68JNzna6Lp3ttpjvZgfQEJdum2FCj2RmNTavLWblERMrE/ja9uOPact/r | ||||
+Xzu1T84Pb29KbmGvxC7TEKYTUoLxi78sqhvdEMXdJGPZCvLJJXUWwt5CIrG | ||||
i8aEx4GotZAyto4WTl3oPnK+YT50QplNN5DUaPCwhXddWduRcyONZuBMSyx2 | ||||
JI4nMjxgmI4QyYMDkxRG+iP47emPbV578XrSd2RUrWmYZgIKY6a9F/cUi/oQ | ||||
Z+8c7EDvEmYlAQcrrWzYAUAHGi4N0Q0m1XxeTMKhtU85NcyFcBPe76c10bCM | ||||
rO+s5PDYEqxPLFUiVjI7ihscHJOtrl82DefXSWIHx/QsVEVPa8BtJSAJpsmJ | ||||
CazZiPdF9s95i6Zg17Y5Z5ysPW2C94KxwjxpNR6OOJoyu2g/+ldEiTZyuNBo | ||||
4PxUmoR85dj5VNnTwOledXZGgpPLKHo0tBwF1WJJXBW5p0en5N8kWRaJsCM6 | ||||
r6L8Ol3nxRq265R5dQtb44q17pGRSsII1bhLozkqHBrnRS7IGBbtpjgxHx+/ | ||||
WlafzafFej7D75yEohKpK0nH2TnEJc5BCy8hXUEvgphckBrNyuTKh/XZasPz | ||||
ldtfzRGSRWIL8QZIcsS+1VUPM7ukjWPHWM0M+36lQCKP7GLgGEIUdAbdNTwD | ||||
SUKhVWpT/y3OJrvnSJ+bS35lOCgwjZeu+LvYtfZ0hALr1kyqjlqAyeLUqoJF | ||||
x5EeB79JmehCTN9IXIQvjs5gVzlyUI48vSSbyyujD/riwrh7tCWefCMxVc6M | ||||
Ya59eecakoEtb0kSIq9F7oDum7FkgF2VNdEoPoFcJwrHTo3o5U0bh7U6I+/3 | ||||
lN88SELy4O/ObiHVEgd0OcVNlqsj+at92q40Ds4rFT+LbS2Rjt6y6PDMy4Kt | ||||
cR//P+aH1Khx4BSTfk9Iwuu5QRYEelk3rPhHyqYL6iX4n2nPOFM6fLo5HqoS | ||||
CNe0THkpXSedQvb+S0LdjCiWrerqlZcu8xA2ZG6I6bEzcYGsI2Y9LHfF3o0d | ||||
vcZ2lRsWy1yOaczO6fMNli4eRA5zC88Qrq4cerksPnbSTNI5eNe8WXGS8axZ | ||||
PA2L4FyjYxIQsDw5vXKSryQ94yp41PHtmr6+LGfrat1wrQtSJ6LQnWTr6fL2 | ||||
u1bARipTts0OgCSTTWeOcRfWKuuz8hNioXD7IlV7RTxTrfMQHh0iJSr45JnW | ||||
BuAInO5RIqFwlTctnmCJIizC1hA6g2NeocgXFLSBkYjHOLEjNkBGQjSsbSCr | ||||
Mt4CowPLGzFlxpgTMSow1oqz7uleSyPpNwPkWXY0ZXZmT6FltZ6N+MhoKtfO | ||||
1NcG3kzE27D9dBtnxpi8jpw1waNhq+BYgGhsX+9IxkwkcNXCEQiZL9EczeF5 | ||||
o9PPfRLrL2rHwazmtaOpz8WO0DdHqUWS1gC1aRTrwOxLdZohpPxTkkU08YJP | ||||
QpKAl2ZY2ZNzz32zQowTvYvPgATT5TTRYWK6zT59sjqoz5+z1y/enWRtPgNZ | ||||
FR85JgGWa6k6EiLw6a5xMcfLmuZ+W9Uf9IEhpfbzZ3o5kSBZS8N4gHmrdKl0 | ||||
Snok+IHoic6dtHQic5DKsojJxVMCcrQKeL2gQ9BSE9MCK/CpRC5JW2Nf0WrK | ||||
zinEA6QkBJG5JPMJWnLwCQ6cRaOQ4FQE7zjzG6K2G6FqnFbLFeLL48Mk5nmS | ||||
RsnK6Ea+G04PkxE9a73g7NU4xBE7+2Nfv1mGbVV3E/A0sc5cCyG45qcjAdVo | ||||
OThF03MTPUfQbN5L3qqve8Wunfvd+MX0VzseaToUPSPa0Zw16x/OX7yMiOMm | ||||
n6+NABzHX9k1hSNmB8w7r3xan3AgvkZfJ1quSOjbCkaDHCqQNmdMzjkOQU+X | ||||
DIXowZxMEM5wIc81p0GHdR6JZgUjIbtc1yT2GoQeOCViKmYQnwB+4RVXIGzJ | ||||
3LXwujLgYxmokjaIRmOEQt7sdi4592dlUdM5Kx8kZMlMIS1wfoeC2I3BJ0MP | ||||
eVchpZvorwGNg4bxAFr6eIbiUyIhNWrExeLnmRUwHMsrJHD/rRATDE+Y0Aoj | ||||
JEUDxUGDaUPPplWuEMJpSsmPDSShsZp8jh0DF5tM1uJiVg9O0RZmDxnVkvY1 | ||||
nyZpmkQBcm+xEgOZlQld5JAjH4wc5/5Me4EnaESX5wubrpgiA/Q22rWVplNB | ||||
Ebu1uzRk2o9cUmC/w+w/wGqZyQ0y11zzUDV9IJFzUQpcl5skEsATf1vRqE99 | ||||
ODc5kiKiRJiwrk9kIourx9AJe029O3xALryy9Cq/RXlE7p2+7AxetWJnXXGE | ||||
c1OLojs4fBMlft/vWj1bMmu8rKt8imgu8vWLoVJuqraxGX4H2TZTnVsPuvdQ | ||||
ayZT1mGQvyPVjOTfYlk0v1NDgd2YIebj17bnJ++4iq0n82wkygyKRpo6kbva | ||||
TyVRi8RakCHqc9PFNZCRkQzjDxYN/wK61sgkTajBIf9jZCxwDqJY2lwpwz7A | ||||
qDCPJ82pNbKgkjrEfBnZ+1maA81KU1LDg084Osz2wdK85KZJYeL0kMgiNJKU | ||||
yG/HXBQnDdfn0QrO1jn8A4WkmROxlZKiuUmTH4o7ZJORBdR7/f7iXW8o/2Zv | ||||
fuTfz1/8r/dn5y9O8fvFDyevXvlf5ApHf/z4/pV+j9/Cnc9/fP36xZtTuZk+ | ||||
zTofvT753z1xyfV+fPvu7Mc3J696mw5NjvdzrMO7a4W2rBKIZcqz52/d7kHG | ||||
qbiofyddin9HHTr9jkxjkb5s58mfLTKPkXGcS2XHfO7InilbzihBCuM1XPxw | ||||
CcEHLw7l900Uo/kqDbXrt2bbnY+TPFHzHeDDgcVh9ZkosxGXDBI3G+dNNdx6 | ||||
8uzNy6x/suZ8AfoYOcfrZvQmX9cog14MZPKo6KfJs7rrzJNFcwmlM0bgTKL3 | ||||
TEPopFsrg8CyMXDJQ+JHFT6GRbe8ZGOX02T9K5ueXlkjPSF5v2g3SdWPL/6J | ||||
4nYX5oHeOt6NqgoeaHZNv7LNAoUv+LATDf+/8B/K1HrrenlE8z3qZW8uLvRz | ||||
J0ko9IEVr4RltAANxiaeNrX4tz8fz3iasocevYtNzxELGX+pvJUFQXx9KEpS | ||||
WuLYTZ9TSYNBO3TIYZiUK85Pjc3fTFhxh6UNNNEm19htNzmaU0NIHyynSC7J | ||||
pPaLWXHsTfaOAJcmpKVeV1OYNPuVxiNu0qRuCRfiG/Wamp+Pre6wWrYfiQVt | ||||
brxUZi3Vz7fVO6SzF9+N+BaOWRzqPOYuEA7X6tjBZd6uZ0F1FDXz2KR2fkUk | ||||
zpSzS7SJciPY+7nmRFErfhs6dpLL60t25tKe50FHhGVR3JjKFWQgq4ND87jT | ||||
oOaalMERHp+nKfZkf5WvYJdMSUDDTSIxAvUZJWtj5qxMXKgba0y6vLcoufwg | ||||
ofTkESnJj1Aan33X7x330s+RdjNIDt0G+cu9NBRLf9qSzcCXeH+JhFxkg7fq | ||||
MrLfnAGbVFnyisbBGZ+2s1D/28bAfLVGPDofqd1IusgqPgjG+F2UiRRnz2oq | ||||
GRN3X3L7pLyFo3Ji0mj+WlMU7tMnGheGMxJ2+/nzAJM7XXvnktGCVoh24A+U | ||||
h1u2lUmPxqpWeUGJSKHHL1GLyj7rjbnFvmQ+o40sqfc9k6TyIA0kq2BGtHW1 | ||||
nNGyReqCZiaT9scpZJmCQmVnp2qZkAyawV+lAd+mgDIkG3xy8fzsLOTfNUeZ | ||||
8wx+MnlHussYQtNnLsh2REoZK3qyp9s3fJhx7Ow+5VFTdYRJLZQsO8vdl1HS | ||||
MNz7dy9Hj7NvR8iVha9sQHy9KGidlvS6vJmU5QiT0Q39s3BsnzinPuGIWNR0 | ||||
j5gelxfHomAbo258RTBMFLzq7ErU6thztlGoJ2njSWaoTy4krcpXSMv55PDx | ||||
ZSg70Zlukq57ITZco3lTkRaWaIrXdyvsH9voYuawL0csgE03ZLxOOlMfw9jY | ||||
5vEGGwKrsoTUIAM7llWsegB6bOSlSOPnTay5yCfXcdwi2YXgeizrsIRx5qPa | ||||
4PlU8Fs6Qf7U5yNpXmDdFt2R+o2koPimEPmo6YdBMmUccnJccjvU9BroF63P | ||||
ATClg9Mn8eSBd3xxhssl0XWB8Miduyy8Vx3FKFiDJGCTRad+EgwkfgyiIS7E | ||||
AKwgyOIApfC1kMuSo6BG//YFV5v7mdjgoPuTpfcg6Dq2sTF/RJf0LusjiTdU | ||||
R3TayUapelmff5PcXlmlqD5rMJTbjpu8Gq/y9bz64gMu3v9+Z+fFfpW9xaWy | ||||
2IOs+4jjCQ2TTnbzxWc914twe7xXkPsvsRIts/zCTtyWio80c8NLfGOrZXuE | ||||
EVb0x2xWHO3t7OyPdp6M9naPDxSvrm9lhwj8+/uu6iMSau3RvCpx08Fod2+0 | ||||
8/B4f0+Qf/ovIa6u03uK5ghpVFO87A530S2P6Mbj3b19uetihYPUuW1yfTwj | ||||
alk3R2AyUDKKek7MAk+g23dGu4fHTx7qE77nK7OLW6I2Wr5ly3XYWM9oHOuj | ||||
iQeCOtIqgRtMnh7G8z/mX3efjF68l8e+eB9hR2Wndkt4Jo0OajtpXmPUTbTY | ||||
TsYaOtoFnggt0N7j40ePRodPDnWk7y+yi+eZvyw7L2lVspsmO5vPy2VVNuHh | ||||
l8URIzKU8zEvur8JmcpYQxrx7uPD8d4jffapXmCH8Fkxn5WMf+VTOjnp0Stv | ||||
f9xQ2c7VSMw+fdPh8V+woZ07YY/fpgZolmQoBFI3M+rKwUsKVvt8NCs5t6bS | ||||
NtvVy6Ouh4WmF180DDXvWYhxbWXfx53ny6MtxySxV5I3uOxLT6x9GshRFkrN | ||||
Yq4fF65JoCJYYOzTyyXBj86P5tzWHXtcJmWV/+GNLLjpEZfsq1ohwGjCH1bH | ||||
6ZuL7GfEjThSahn2GlLQR0MS4ho44AtIMlV4WZ0lybQ0AzNSA2XIG1IC66Qp | ||||
aIEkoKeScqHPLqYm4wxYYcuCxFOBUxzvsWEy64eaO+cgYZTLwFuhmvRRXF3u | ||||
FW1LqwvJoSVMvzsztMQlXnpLj15RLFYwsd+aTmECqDAcsojrkgjoHWe9Z3X+ | ||||
cznHb29JVpOEJxJ9qXLnoliyZ0Bj8ENOviF+2DtW/J6//sUP+68/uV6xxnPS | ||||
5GZ8cvo9sSkyFYfb0O/C4/Wh/iXdx6+XgA/EA+nJ2Bup+m74FW/Phln68caD | ||||
v/Rw5T1vqrawjbZoCarMPX2Azr77jpTX776DBXN28uYk9kzhWk5oS6l7Q2Vg | ||||
PmTaTV1ViJp+ZLcEYndFPSb5Oi5be3RZJE5eDZeTRY8o0tg43b2WhKRbysx5 | ||||
Onq2TguwIo66vviIEF0fgCwTwDiyW0DTSjg7UUIt3h6dBayvvo/EODX/8Irb | ||||
4pLrVqeF5Af5uDpCiuHugfCIyHp1pt0XiCFa9Uc6pPtm6kyLyz3snC1yxfrc | ||||
NPi4LUFq6yLwGGwAGhZIDGyzGE17XJGmm3PwwEI9xM1oboI9Q0dz4xmZRpE4 | ||||
ksBem+2uLHYqx9qpT/PpooYwVzBPUsKTUXA+uWMzWQfcKj/TwfZk6rSSqJzp | ||||
ASUjJDSUS/OK7wGsIlqxTG5rZL1EsiWELkiGWeKGDqI05GmzMD27Yj7IkoWX | ||||
pdGUz25MhFO1zCBrfIxShZ7t+MY4zOPHZgD7d9tqpbXXbNJryEqG2fnOtotD | ||||
kgYKsvU1x//kVACfybZ2KJRXqynlrINNG1yvEz7ossAJ/4zK/+xdndMq/Jj4 | ||||
brtZrUX2jib+ChOnB5yKpSsIafJwcPmB5yBbvlc2jcXs3bYV/+Erq5JYmF/S | ||||
exfUZX5JrbSR4V/4NHUW6R6PhL4L6ZP0NA8tlsehBzHoh5uUDV6go1TqzjJk | ||||
BkgAc15+EJfemLj3OK9XuRWdsnJmjIw9VxnDCSzvFltXQvyCVqBk2cOT64rk | ||||
cXa5qYdpBhHStl6GUPWmZzHxZ3ryeWGQD75eUY6P7EWvKCZ+Qj284mR5J+na | ||||
cFiXtE0hXS0XnyXRrayqzLFjQns34DjV7pU7WORQ9EIsxXSIEGsubr+8dbc8 | ||||
tpuyQr6jCiE+O5wa7uOjEhsPCf2/8DqO+LMbCekIU5ZEAirE4T5GFqo/MGG6 | ||||
XnVJcpcu69E2jUmzncwrc/tA9saDiDK+0jTSc2EIvFz2vC5LEM2Ak0maymNy | ||||
wFXhtlEnJw9sIVrMgnYW61VrlgyXmRe8Y+ZprZ0Mo5mY23PLaDjgJpzMZrtl | ||||
xCFIzUnxmgzqNgiXE0CEUSt/5MydVjGXRUeJzZE+Y5oPIFZvr6uO5RFeC+Wr | ||||
ktswFZbPoA6JwH4p1ro9UhnX2r05Ox2EwCu/hEsLVSoe7EIq/lDdFlxelivO | ||||
Iadoef8x76nkyKfgIM4MSiwN7Ab7e4gPsOKSNMqZfUuBDNYDrdlZnSIl9YbS | ||||
u9jj27Aj1P0pZ6xmXPDaTu8XQqH36pJ95vyAQyxbbyY1A2/5cDWEjKhjgxrn | ||||
2qoeJ4gGUhi78tXG3TDd75C9Uy6QQegXb7OWRbIANfdZsR8kA5qr4xD7dDrj | ||||
7yP4MyIuwVy8AiXynBhvUJEo2J/YcWzRYXOxybwQll0anhE97+UaSU013KZD | ||||
jRWoP7PPKVckl9w9it3Qp6XQ0Ws49MYeWAUPjDHenKAH5uVClWVJ8OnUggyV | ||||
OyCH96YS9dRT47bhh4I0zWfAyr6UApqEGEO8fVs8/sv/GdiZwmTQlLREz/KW | ||||
ruyFIWyhNSWJygkhcwKppImhZNJl9revp/ulzEd/EJqie4bN+Y7cD7ZLAr/B | ||||
aCOe4HpboWYbxpptBhpAslgZ3MysqzHPdoB/zPEirxYIh0IWAIunHMxCq6Wj | ||||
IZaK7wd5RtO2uFQ6B42iF3MQCksOZstLpN5x8s9LPZVX6/ncON+Wg9ikY2PO | ||||
OcxWyAAunLAha8RCD2Ggu3NjgWEvsk/fBGa1bWO6eXD3cVUdjI90CMSr5+nB | ||||
9fEHGmuxoodE2beazVcK0AXr5er/i6UREl7gR+CCNU1QNvXm2PX+bcuDk5rd | ||||
Lz+bHy0fDBVHXILr9OijrY8ul4EFRjFmq0Tg3Ic7uvu4czdbNuIrS3NCyghK | ||||
V3MN9AUCAd120mJQgkHUVitKjRkGG4+RZUuiJDSs32+ZVF2sirZsTdBhADTA | ||||
Op2tWhv8UI97HFnJA3r4f8YPt9TroJXKOqfBoS1PR/I5njb85aGiFuqmnK45 | ||||
ydIHgpUqMXp+YJDvIlyK3CdhaCU3jE74OnWxuDhly3QF1JGn+l9bBsfRVBG5 | ||||
CRZxDFganoqbGaNW11xxavHw73pM5r3/0UuPW6KbrHLRTcbmSntXZR+KYkW2 | ||||
/+QDgIt4SWjfteiNGaYvQ0scI8AvIxsr5erDmAeenRpT8njRBoFs6QIWvzZW | ||||
kfUehDRBPb0ezjpcxalJnBrg2SHX1LneiDT/4iNnzhpupiSqccEUFlMYHv85 | ||||
ku9E9QIKBnypgEy8gWKyyd/iTIKQNCG2ZKBYydPor1eqAsjB408HmeOqSruU | ||||
aAehm1lC3cjYFBNJHcTDTLgjEeG8Ejg/YGp1VOFcUZRGJSNxYxaFB/Hu+tlZ | ||||
XCESjNTI1XVO505zJtN0/jB2AeuRcTBz1FirYzGnZv9QzHvj7zy34cbkHNt2 | ||||
kk7MxUse8YJ1nXyOpcksCN0zXNGeN9Vr7mEjvojewr7GJpIoZ0MnEluVIlBi | ||||
CJKIcc64W5++6eRcfF2lvpLCWQCeYgzoivRsREYEg1ZcvvRdRcQSAYKtuGrf | ||||
xUUgHODnlC4+hxAnAqcwNRAnNQM5ls9gwOyTBlhVflOV0+hYaN6/zy6xevCN | ||||
KAuHfr60RDUvkWxBhHrjb0FWWT4BE59ksO3og/F4LDjhxGqWBvQLl6I80kXv | ||||
053F6yxUjKT5rNeQEG45Gr6DVFLSrSb+ZPN3eU9u02Cx3CUUwLc9rouNG+Vr | ||||
orLeYOj9U9CdkflFXK6ozYTFZHuv8aCXz+nxxbLnkmfRq5B5hC8GhlkBWGMt | ||||
wG5YGa6u2E3KT/cVXOxWBL29Ss4c56V3x8EhecBcYF1RQpXD3CkhiZqfi7aV | ||||
pcadWs2dRPTEKZI3yMKJtsuUSC/D8HCUPcrs8svqpgAy/ERkXlvOkfqEFw2Z | ||||
7dxmfbqOzl9Oqm/ZttDqyeCHVOKNh0CjJazIyAHE3GStw1R/96JCwcG6bCWN | ||||
ieE4AUAqqhnqqZsVciz9ckYwPLkCJXiHm2cfiePNpQFc6GRYaSCwhdowlisV | ||||
OlRswTKXFBG6SXJoElSbwO47yXOSjwv8eKlbkBIFARaZsHWtp61CrRfNbxqs | ||||
aVEkbFoAL2CFP7WTiBM+l7qeudp7tkYSKCB+UEtqDhjEFcKYZrGHQfOpd5ag | ||||
lxIh30xKxVQSGqVqQiFtpAroo2Ad4JFOhugJ2EeBb2thXAY5wstdrUiGlVxQ | ||||
VPp0OEWPkGp9rmq5apmAfPyByME3tWruFpcV4GeRomYNFkyvtwy1UHvE4Hve | ||||
tEiR6mthhy5NauMCyZTChtn7N2fPfzx94UlNPN/LqcDgKLrtcuaWpK+iLpMY | ||||
e1tNKi4uIIXebmdZtKpK1vvvYbL6ChdrMlk3TzANrv1FMcl/4tX/i/YC/Inz | ||||
+KwLRS6+n+C8X1bijlP2L/a6wYEAQpW1OejHKLsCNgH7J6WQRhbAY/lhEbyQ | ||||
05xlkn5S8NH6rK4NP7cicQALNFSeBpPRcSgMKTsSamLcIl4V5p3dZM/YhQvZ | ||||
y4eOhcrpG+JLQQoKRrK3+9Hg8PPnbLVe3vEGCQOOhABCO5EUwIZ8XI5GC/5r | ||||
tH+XD4ZW/TyFGVCtOLRldc/iobqCUmZm5A3H3zACrPZlWJ5lflPOfFYur2FV | ||||
69R92oOutBVe18Wc4bgYCM5eOgSBYUXxDK6q56i6FF+L3rGl+HScBtOLTBOI | ||||
aAmHGmtQI9hgTVI/Rj8h1GIKBVfFV6QggxUEVhrxgubIK/uStojMo/K01OAB | ||||
7I07pm+0p/wJ/sD1YkGM92feVtGofEaG6GNlJxOICel5xDJULQGIPehpmGhH | ||||
fn04C1vDUHrqFvmHImI+kJ7iae+wACYN2gUW0e95B5QfKIypkjSPZOOgS8MB | ||||
Os6fP3eYzeabhhywEkL01ByR+FC0AR7lJp2ha9wmyWLQzxlVxlwCvy35sc+I | ||||
YQv8lxqtWkqiKk62DkFRbETPYTlEC+IU5SDMRc/kQt0H5unQI2kdAS0tQyMC | ||||
qioLSGTin0pjwRVEeaW0urICUQ8chhndViG/sq+yFmGTu5r0JxTnq/AcaNl5 | ||||
yJgIJRz2PF8YKxnQRW3gksXUO8rybFLWkpBtF6t28zrO1qXNkVaMWf98vZw2 | ||||
k+u6KC/hbClQKX3R5tM2i7XfwREAMGAgZU+NMRxNC6R/TtsxmSa46KiOn3VE | ||||
Oh/dtFYzbNtt0Qu239te0YnYdue3H5/vf/vx2Rfu9Ydgy+0pB99yu3pEbE0l | ||||
5xmBAxVT52uiZ7QHVtBBcAnevqNsVjXraU5EfFNlP+cf4DTLsonu91FGUz44 | ||||
2MXP/Rfh94O96JOX/Psp/3zMP9FqmH95xD93+OdJuGX/dOv+1OujaDRHPJp7 | ||||
d4Uu/vqxRflZOjId6NGXh3nPvtK7v/14uvvtx8f0/9Md2tgX0d/4dy/+PHo7 | ||||
ffVSvzrVfx/rv4dH+ssj/XdH/z1J7veP5WfcTzw0RpDN4528uCz2J9PF1fTD | ||||
zD5aflgUfKvjOgRfKx1oZXtdk8ezRyKW6DT9Xr0m69QF9uaZhcmtfo/3gtf3 | ||||
4KA34LRY+M4wbHl2DwNb7eZlzxPzCXdVL0XYuo4PI/mS+Qtx0GLp0SO0G5iB | ||||
R4ldE6FJi670ulzCSIwKH8SQPiWVHF/4HiEa1rPvz4sZ2Y3sVKpQThhAbQEg | ||||
wdI9qJFlHZyXWEPAa6dVRKnDaNyTCKaWk2z4iU5xtl8KjMCnb6Z5y67Az5sl | ||||
1FzBFFpbSxWTFyjeMxKBuCdYSXBLoygpTIY/EaXfVzeFe6LSFwM5OJACvoBm | ||||
fVcAKc/tdT9fkKJ2Pcw2Pp/md4O4bo+HMCrJWH2a3dF/o8ViNJ0axdgiXtD2 | ||||
Cdjt3jB78iQ432DogUqwprtPnjxB8v/OXo8LlsQloiNHO8C6aDbQKrc4+TsF | ||||
U761B7pQtVIEBQGvvR9InSDrcCEzNGNY9AGLFrA8FVMf4/JRf1Pj4GswNxtD | ||||
aDfW5pijuOnDhF7/WDAe3wTuSeKuAy0MM4VZgrAeKTCwAobF0doS0opCACxm | ||||
Dr9rGHJWV84cb/52vWOF4xqVb2S3Ztzt7Y5fzNfz4eGjwye+C5/fdE7L+qGg | ||||
036b1splGbjK4ekz/Hx5wL/vjOUf/Hy2y78/55+H/In8/pwvesFclX97wj93 | ||||
ouc87mk+mKi4knbPXad73348nHz78dHhtx/3iQHv078HB/T/vS2fP6R/D7qf | ||||
O2biuAd/7xXbn4ffNz6nd+zv4nN5xsYY9u951uG2Z+k47rkHn28dG/6/a5/L | ||||
M+Lv9p9sv2frfHh95Blbx/0Y7M5iPcaE1LDQSIZwJCUxI+coGOU0ZDItWs56 | ||||
IR6IY/PpE10zgnj6/JlEV7m9YDwBHoTNb9lzDPsn9L7BnIgxeR71lwwRQv6T | ||||
7sl++tV8il5ILDxbzenc6BnQY4YqKRfxsP/8R8+Ck8Nw70Ew3pg43QX9IWDw | ||||
SO6DOqEfSPJmuMaH8/SCYc97Zzg8l5EE9e4lv1qaZKuix5xZsYO+N+5FINS/ | ||||
ZebIU+edU01osqKsXRmuvTKCTDQzLI0zboJteYPVUDWSEmNMMedGIs+1b+KN | ||||
Iru8JTOmXWvKVV5/+Jqck6BBdYKB2SR6ulKotRIFCGzB7lDxFwtiL8uQVTQG | ||||
JDMqiI8+3Nd/R24XhJnoWS3J1Ws0BJ/mDf41GGDOvo1ak6p0HUpaScgn6S8r | ||||
x96vKL0BGFCNxUk0uyn15BQ0HUtxq10+m8FU1diCv1ZLBgR+Bi5eCVDK+sjW | ||||
cmCdd156pkyJmPtEkAPdQ2TOaE87CStzoLM33hIbxDBfllyrQKvwDN02xK9N | ||||
n/s82rdzdCdfznrOfNxeKRxf6c3jS753bP3Wxiu76RjM4rXGktjS4xc21U0v | ||||
6zxPvpdn4vsBUYqm3LpAPO9CDNwn5Ap4kYRGr7S1G7q/+dZKAr0pjV1cmuTT | ||||
9yEFy2EG6GFgwLdV5F9IFHmkNHr1ffBVqrfbrnq/PPmxpzZOvrQI7VVVTcf5 | ||||
rEbRODcAiTMNWR3/Ea5tIvE3kivRPYKcpsAJeJrOESmLFuPcYhEI4tsSyY38 | ||||
eKf9Na2Rsbj+fQ5IlmIJcoKOHWIFF+l0cOx090ICogLcWjUN3fdn5MHWZOlB | ||||
/51gDFBiG0ZyyevpXFuLSAquwNBHWU5HOMvMHAEJWC3yZfQESAiucKF5TP8m | ||||
fMdC8PK6TC/W61bFR4WA7J/9CftcoqM3BNvOsx0yHf4/62wcdvQUCSsCznz2 | ||||
p4jSp/7z8QHvYew0xGQSbLOO9MhG2TPiLox/GnBXPn0z0Wd8/gfEyxZ584zd | ||||
vG99/cp21q4nMQaYkeRoyxW1YkeFEY7w4foIkgGqeVI2BWf79S5J8yl99MrA | ||||
vnpsSD47hU8W2hTrSZ8+NfUE7TBIgeI0WLjBQ+6F5JNGEOyq048yFBWMOPWQ | ||||
gdfuWNHWxZWES43JhHSBjHg2cC7hV8flluYzj5IiVxAv8PAK+o112xCj1rKR | ||||
GBRXlbsoV0RCekUMOoJHSif0FFuxf4lCBgE/HEiOrGBESrVl3LsP1MOhxySR | ||||
R9EGIB3QzwUFDR51R+HsAlile02Gh9Qvh3xdUOR5anN++sY24ysVAPD0TsEb | ||||
upQ+Oyf9uP8SEt2SsqMuG1jLZzGFuHPOZWkGDB4yN9+1uHDPXr46yfpp473I | ||||
+4iJlJd1Xt+5E0VI9brRWcTfJe0hT3FxuGBN4ezugymi4a6RPEb2rkAte5Qm | ||||
TjDXVR+odet8LVri1ofc8bcRheA91vm89SXaCGwcxVmOAq5MJ7dNUZSMRRxj | ||||
8Bie5B2VbYyn13RnK1RUCgKiZ7OgKMQq6PKFIJIzwDtAlgSkN3Dh9NGmLicj | ||||
i+GYFNITs0oGyoc4PApOiQi4CauqQ2Pw0vVq1FYjTm30fsCt2Fd+2Nj7B1Hk | ||||
P+NsxgAqyPCusQ9St8pHU+Kt4jIexZrCUvFGJXmynXXxqLtkkFXT0iP6L6Ol | ||||
FCnLC4Mdu39p/CM6ZUro+Yi17aMuUaJCKcLV0Ed+gweH0UHfnr70anfGGSs8 | ||||
a83MT1KWpZML81WyLu/b/km1klr0dFW6O55SZpR+6teLHlQKRi/n4OXcWnfN | ||||
vSuFVRrgzgaucTMOZlWCo+t5kfAVD6IQAy1a0XOY0PZONlaZgORYRvKMW3bk | ||||
DLXP/D8xhSRJEImfiuGaAGgnadzo1QTFSjKUbiBVkA7FOpX6CiMC0lY0UYel | ||||
LoRiQL+KoRemQprcTMrggDmNx8Po+BaSLBJ9e4tKHb43wKRGnTN3QeyHjokr | ||||
6XQ6TLTqQcA8ReEW0oV8hnFnoS0NtnNKpL2K+LG9exi9YGn4htSnR/9aoeGc | ||||
YsWpEdzG/kg1DjaWgg21pvArA+ge7U0q2YxFQ3o7jwhc0ldBkV20nvucdjlL | ||||
KcKQ2Oyrej1VAIvcXqfmBXJSgEysUX2rg5UmTW2DXikwZHzhK2th/CJJu9dn | ||||
Il+XS7lsLQRCCLxuWnG6j5FgYCNhrRtJbY04TExc1njEI1N6fwh7sFAq8ksK | ||||
gzwgwjSM8la6Wbzso7GUC/UAuADFTmxCVZi4JIHR2S3FJaoY8kiSAbOt28sM | ||||
RVRXwSMn49MSTvSCZOrzCsxQDbDQR8gysIQgWTvuzi6UdoSepTFH4Ta6PUiE | ||||
npUnkP5aFHF2vpRaMky1HgXBWfmlZhpM/p5riAnHyHroDQ7tRprSymvkVs4M | ||||
H3Y89gzpMdZkaomSJfj4nni4eNNyAxMaC075UWrsxUUq5vMxfcRyTeIc6gjV | ||||
/Fif1b2MST/um51mF3h4GsaPjsD/+BWtIoDHVjqjRy094GFiLGm6RlDYeDLc | ||||
kUw7/Lj0RBnyrfZkMIhvhou3qomoZR+7QVysAORLn3cI8S5kJbqUaIMYo+T4 | ||||
pBg/m5pTH3Q30HY1gUsKS+iA4QktiNnu82jNPWm7yNEkn9luSWWeEAbHBu6g | ||||
xWG0Ex/9w52BeQRBsBFSbGM3ciKnpRmB9QZK1nzAaxShBwnsIQOVd1Yk3Vut | ||||
reRz6XixhonwTt+SqJZGdp7YvGrg63K01Vns2j32Kdp0lSeHjWeID5QuvSB2 | ||||
8zPgvZbTgYe887I6dRrLLR3o2pYNCvZ7CVyetSnzreXMv8ZV9SjiIG7kDIwq | ||||
CatIGDZ0VIqcG1XEZXVtGZ0aWp/bgiOM/yKW/JRV5uwvKIoL6/8TffBvvXQT | ||||
fITEBz1Dw3NRbGIhbTb/cPNca99KafNtzCowVDk53iHEKlJy2NDpS0rCJgBf | ||||
43xqj+uvCoo1I0o5Ir/S99lwnitbI3DlkmXtGd8w4mMRZ3BcfAm4UHjBfcor | ||||
wgHdjTG879hLBbn0Z5ZLgrTxdY6BbcJ/gw5Ck5mo6kvgd4liFX+XnR7r2iUW | ||||
uNURLqSQ3JL3h8p+Z2vBAIIkhlIutf0tdyjhDEnVIZcgYHBWWhhSTuvq1ok4 | ||||
bqz2ZEU2wnIiubieLJkKn0b9mFDxqJkd/Lsh137Xx1+8bVsAf8P9lk6hdeGM | ||||
CF0hTBILdV9JKS8y5+SFQGJbEGCY5Lsh1EPyXS2+Y7ZddZz6TlMSoicPk65+ | ||||
0srW6u+4J0hAO51AXwATuIv7LwwVO3DocfrMpUrHXFtse8xr7JFOhV7H7RhC | ||||
wYK0seBxezRgTRrWDhPWFceDNoXWYR7QyMKBrh8DFgsUxVrTUQKC5xYHOT6+ | ||||
lmwJw0yiqfOweHP9Bm4IWlWkRHeyeZ7wPbsijzyf96fbO/sSFuCbY1oRH6OY | ||||
MAdwSJtI2FaEAScwIcHgFrgQ76XUVnX3jBwSuQkiugPFlIxvjLkYZpNhsHSZ | ||||
oT41/l3eAP2dl7fzCrnGW3LQEdqWhLG1I3l3fU9pMZ9RETFJcz9eBgv8ajKN | ||||
4VpAjw369tCXdShyrdeQvQVvGGOuk7vDEcYIi6yvtnwO8TrVFqxDKwxFvQBz | ||||
JSIIq2Y3ag+KFg9CB2qF6+xGF0cHPWuEOaNy3UMJ92O0YAa+4GX59eimD0c7 | ||||
h6Pdg+O9vQDd+eHIBw7/toYKVggYa3HE2QQABX10fHD4qwFJI9xTxlMkYTgW | ||||
kNAqgfDcZcTVx8cPH8fwqvTAYnE5L4qxKTfFkTJT1uGBvLq7PzbxT8f/ePfR | ||||
wzCty9rQVo3V0dpVR8h74ykdHgMiYDcsA0NIHa0Zx0rf2RwrvY11NHdHIe37 | ||||
iBWb3ScPd0e7uxh/PgKkwO7Dh+Ghy/nRdTUrxnWeT48ui2a+pi0R1NKD0c7u | ||||
8eXk8eHj3Silpds4kQNwvoFsDOFifQfZ9W28OOmpE7WPiqzYGIq5UZx5CY5z | ||||
5rxHi0QhiSE0c6SIuW1oNYTEPTkxQsGsyijPHWcX3J6JD37p4ad8Zlku/U4D | ||||
gIk/iOjHBkdIs7WNpKW7M0QE59ZAebUATmq2mq/NPzEtOI7xvWn4xIF+wEpI | ||||
daA07vV5aR6L/5eG44RfGMJp3HF+yxTFg4G3R7ltBw8On2R/XE9ncfOdFy+e | ||||
i/zHB3+UM5rtHDyg/xH97ZCqAPbakOYMD+vJ98G11GQPshfPL55nP5S0byce | ||||
pybzWcEx8tYRY/d6LvA3ZA9gHEd4C5PswfHB6PCJjfNHLlL50iB3Hz/YOdwY | ||||
JA1Raz3++UEyw9UBEmt7LAO0jGExcqI8hbOt5pLZWMFGE6WiIkGSQgJwaFNV | ||||
F/X7xQ5N37jRnhOxaAVfkOVamOOJS5/D68YpuFqOvlACqIXGiUvpVOm+5+Zt | ||||
d6qyMZOIDq6d0tsKXq3Y1ouPgFNElt5V3QMl96ZF2t8iipt3Ya+JNxCbRL64 | ||||
4jSkBQp0BYqC6nzGlzhp1gYHrtR+Nr7jNAjHsLJVbZO5JSMZBF9b6MISowyr | ||||
B5w1qS+Y2cM4JQJBhK/YptgD4PItbqeo0JK9NMwurTFNDAKgu6AtB7UmGG34 | ||||
SvZTI2zMnmhrSxn17QuhMtUOXQzF7Bu7besh06nLXQdfhuv2Bt3cb4YKZ8zs | ||||
BCdc8c4fHe/vorFWcjVZ57N5WfH1LV2fd6/3nVte0+GpFL4stIBVT6UiVmvf | ||||
wGsGyOuY9LQfHrUg6oOC1Zxrp1YO5IiPPWpLzuuvTdcRKLGKUO5VkrRYpKHN | ||||
iRvhNEnbsqEmfmlKQdC+JWYUqAOIgCtNnhtvAibyLJIUnd81zvdVNwcqphLF | ||||
5zjC7DPxUHOgdlrUkZ1zzK3F66lH0sc736LwfhqJlfNCTMPBr3EhvPD+mn/G | ||||
kRC5ExhlR/rZakp85GmOvfySfhEn3QUZHnzGdQL9yNjqUYF18DX+HArLVojO | ||||
iZMCUeck6iTtODTQrFkiXaAPaScu1XgSdwJaicRJyquCH8rzsIFwH2+fqeK9 | ||||
BVc+FUS8POaGHWdvitvELZ6LU1zX7ZL3W2swOYGWo4WXd+KdCHGuaeipE73U | ||||
B7vYhc5gc1E35DCcuLMG3SY9cg3Gi7Tikv/W3p+al1PXhb8hduhKG8+sz1+H | ||||
kE6NL/I25zvLmXStLhjTjyfHzYQQoAShKrptFFDmlW5WOTsuVmKIZoogH9VA | ||||
WhWC7HB0Zg29KF5jxkpm7I1MdtmoijOabEd1JxJ3ccq6vJRwAkPEjmjzztpj | ||||
tD6X8zpul1Fqhj+D427XOB5pyvjj8DKM8o1eODQZb1qHR8Wl5QH4jI1y7/FL | ||||
nLrRe576lfgLN4jTif206SyLDuN2T0snNyROIrFAUjJdjkybi7pME0L0hKec | ||||
1Vo7+9CUQBK0x3oSfBTkvr40kBMR1UWS5ewqRNIkF2AjMFbGMNfKgBppxtez | ||||
i3vDVO1o41SE4LfCcfAVdVf3OhwQ93RfdjjQUz5/FvdcSLZJN2hLs7IoLydk | ||||
5URaRbQRwxTzQcq6Hx48RHpZ2T5V4Jwhnemnog4O3bR4KqqgaQycgj0jJRir | ||||
7jv2bAwmbqTr4nOfJHSqlunvyhuvGkVBGEfMiHOJcIpV/ZRmYHI/x4g4H9wy | ||||
wLdm+MvQt3SjCmHXW48BLrLGbUSeAJq7qXTafAL0afpmsmvjRlNxq5wtXnvJ | ||||
6Yvl7za30uQ6aX4TfEp/EAIu5mQoSCeWTfJfqr4fN7hRm4FEdtH+vPWROSmg | ||||
xf2P1N34ihGK82Wf9FE/xk54+tcPMXqmDXLLM7tj/BVdbX7NuopAsI439lAf | ||||
tfhqPe91HIZTVQ95pXz/iIN0vwZkbLv2F7V9yWMPSQe9cmvHzDjBqLTupcJT | ||||
c4/OZA5vTULZEG8u8TmzgJJknKMoKYdGciVI0D66j8Yi4YTGvA35cSS+fXfc | ||||
qHGbucVCOsDv4q85WQnpFvB8+CTITlQ69LL1JhJP2D8zk+g/N5uXxKep77Ce | ||||
CFzS3KTfOvOiDI6BwgN00NJBrrLmpHgmnHfrDS4uPBXD1dxZ4VZFM7EhIWkT | ||||
dWwS6PBYMN4jb6Z2zkDfaTacacnA0ede6n65oBpqyZ0mhHDepC81FjOJcyWl | ||||
kXrImIyq1rPNTh+vz16/YFhwWqjRO7j8ohaQ6Nq8c3CI1HfvF0QV6INeiugo | ||||
lkEo+vGyvjfqsbfH8tY5FHEUygw3e2zH7FjpuNBkSgneROtFJLaOYxyKvRvr | ||||
Q17p5H5GlhUwzy+LebOZnEFUP49rBGjxXyxn2Nesl8/nvYEkn/ooEvSijbBw | ||||
chcKS0I3h0nOdjjn7lwGaR7qWNQ3IZWC7/hM7w6zl+UMPGzPB0RHVm931C2/ | ||||
2xiM2s+ajMc0YGySpa+HeUsI0SJn14KbnHaP7Vz7VJkHx5CFHhO8CfuPdeUw | ||||
Vf5Tx/3TTxGoqS978lQSZgegRNJDy7zWYBQfqQS31uc+xGN8ffK/QaEx27wS | ||||
wPBUYWpQMcswr3JR7xjIg5GOBdVJlM3Gps36KcB6bwQa2Jlvr0B6eV0ticl7 | ||||
7iAP01MbGQBa2/MuAeDaGiLscgzpCyPNNNHjtl6km6WjfBoxTenum0x8ECEj | ||||
07UL2Jb3XhY28akcgfsfKDuHtANtM3bPY6OgkAHPqmq/ddpR22NpB08MogOF | ||||
7WG9LecRIx2j+nh7nJEWLbHAOpZZ1Bgx289OVnU5z0h32RlmxIYOH2r5H5i+ | ||||
65qUiUAzFl/WCiF000H8jsIjxMM9g8dwxtnu+JHv9CLMijH0p2XEc22ktAFv | ||||
85p+5aCGi/qnb0ZKJd6xf3z48N8ipODRanqFVH966xGt3pyfVI3LtkeDI1mT | ||||
DA5rtTfey07fnWZvzs79MFnFj8w4rtw9femyjbvjyfWY5+XZbo9MHGF/u4NE | ||||
IKgsAoMd3rMC0l7t66eOoY4+LubH03Y6Wpb1iOaDuxs8B/M+amkjq94/vJZY | ||||
yOR5PLV8vNuzA4DhW2NMJOnqcly3Cy/rk+3vBM9c1P+tE5wiMt3ff7DzGJ/t | ||||
7j7YefiAxvqET4m90HiR8w3H7AyhW8VV3rRwJ+SMDMv1RyZUrMZE0d8jF7mP | ||||
hUsEq8yPOHa0xG94/4hMi93d4/390c5jF8yfopHNwLyPyMTjll3jYn38Nx3I | ||||
UVtNqyOMoFxUPc8/JMuXbNur9Vy1Et/GgDXICKqGtWsOjqa8hRtwVOpr43zt | ||||
duAzGwFmiJFx+II1SlY6nKUtWka+usg45MJlL/5qqV6o00eJ24N4AniZwGuK | ||||
DjALcJqLfIWCheuqlY9CzTgGDC+k8+jK0Bqjx2tOXWh0US5gTTeTfJkm98E3 | ||||
3q21s8LA++0fNB3w5YNIUEm7d0jStXTKiGABUg+kM/7Q16r7YUBM93lYxDrg | ||||
SLBUW0lRjAoGX4qTVDzoDN6JMaDj2tB8pz4jWBB81O95Oa8mHyTRO2TF4Nt5 | ||||
NWNXAum2yMFJCzzQCCOoA7Fa3il0dunLXacqJI9Q93MZC59nqGciMMxHenZ6 | ||||
LDbK2anLS26Sk/YSNWFnz1PfNtccwYQJlS1s5QR0IyvG9kqXBkzZyd7W6oAD | ||||
WiEvK58bPyeJWOaMgDBar3iTrsrW69V+Fbv2OC8+cnthtAyGLmQ8aQoGmyM1 | ||||
P8jvJ5tb9uph1vFaOWGMySqyr918gtvjx7mq5LQBf/2fuSunT/0rzk7//a// | ||||
80H+71mbzxiOB8wYgBM001fmmfr06c/7z8eYBneAj1c5gpAqW3OGxUgrtsAx | ||||
lSCJXdZAl9xxOR+t9NtwbAJErLePJXJnFk5Vu7PTBG1VEgSTtqeqryInN5/T | ||||
veGpFlF1UcF77EsTvqLtTJJSlm3R3K39EjRzJSoSmFRcl2mRiairThwdDE+X | ||||
dLYrnSqHxHju3Sb23MGWrFb4Z3VBOs3dOzjUjLSzvIuK82Ae+7jxVVWnKUjs | ||||
e/ddHva80iP8jLTGoCNy+pKYgDWdZbEEsPiuR5fvH9Nj9nrDqN4AL+MWAZwE | ||||
Fb3Fv+ZvpgmQLOGGCAcPHzx6mD3L19drdGTI3jAYARy9tJRfNRSMYo8RApLu | ||||
SmVHyIKyzcO+2YPCJa0nTBqTyJVKwzJt0aJrWxdAulFicgpCqid4wLmfTSG9 | ||||
26bSsaguoiCFlL9jdEr0fAppnZRVwPvDob8gELlzneTb+zLAODlYha1mOoJP | ||||
ruuVNunCiQ4VRQYetr07SCOgLQsAHIWoI7ek5QBhQFJF5k1YOZ/oK4wEmE0B | ||||
4TkxWVtJ3WJ+2/smdtTQArw/P8uuiHYkO9/j7bBQvW9c481y+aaIS8s0fS10 | ||||
MYqbLZed0ghSakfh26f8tz9gf0GfFb9wo3LaxYzyHbd0hOEg7HeP2+6hfSKu | ||||
YpoESw/6/DUpZ8jTYNttd+eh1cbZqLQofiMRSB3sB+wMPzymO/+L3ka/0TD2 | ||||
pYmFwuZGfUJ815g+TW6Q+WrbBK3EMw8lGTqHui04QtfF3G/tZV3dNuCba4WV | ||||
6Gyck6l4OtIGh5oHwjxaSz74ohtZSzpvdVncSDzJ+eQNBQbOvdo/CHLZ5+FE | ||||
ori86sxDaULLI7qoFaIYM1ddc9iMnVm3JSB6AQ4MHpCaurTEf75mZRJjV4L8 | ||||
4d27t0OXTOnih5NXrzKPj9Q5kLS6nIi2lLbCq7qUGDkny80jQuh/M/AAfpzz | ||||
hB4wer4vifUzvJDMOm9VQQnHkuvAJYTdQWoCtF50Erky8VItW9QWLc29jhe9 | ||||
P38lJnFymGNX1sbs+moee6eVlJnIEimGGB5rIvKv/5P+8sfw378JVE1EfVpZ | ||||
XHWYofGDifg4OBnZ9wtWjIYJiTnBI7duK2zRRi2uNvVCYJjHfS9QDTSK7AUu | ||||
XBWcathcZ1eBLu383+aJnqcrwrUf92EygqnyQJX0ti4Ld80Zm6kZq3HWo8FX | ||||
kAnx95neafcGx4YQql0qbMgw9ENOWAxqlPKl9LBbxaEtcgf8qevMFk+hxy11 | ||||
duSnW0DkbBfuradCbMxS9/+xToRFVCL0Qvuf3WtefvPNN6RRTztR7ZA723le | ||||
cAV3zf0YVstDQ1nNLyeG+yLfXKBB4nInSSJig0YsTKuoG2dI73NR+zUyYbQm | ||||
2d/PAN/2gFCMJ5rzRLu0WllwDE4VUrLDXWUTtVeWc8k6A40hpOkRUQ59OCyu | ||||
1dVE5KiZDyls8yZGu4gyaxMaVKJ7fp1zvZEfG0NfAPHCDNvBtqmoQoXiEugz | ||||
XoYw3GQ2KdVLOrBUlqy70jIdzR+A7tjwvpgdrS1OoqTqaI5w8KxbzU57BsQv | ||||
G2LBXfyUi3PZhba/Vfhjjfox27krfC+0yA0ZTVKGC6GrPpw8PBPL7OEtMWKs | ||||
WIXKGrBBMLg7qBGg99eWrXuG+dUNPDOLoutb4YAXyMdCo1oHBreV0qtCXFgt | ||||
HIu5kaHdYVZS/9JEBWyNz0JJvAXCQTeOme+1aCXwG28WBX5+57ymOuBKji3F | ||||
s+HxT2VnOVzx+57+MeiCiHareX6/gQvYsxXd5CCytJrittHflnN6rL6B818T | ||||
r406SNCaNtl8zlrx1YFva4RSDHxwIOgbyZnQfbFSSJMSsOGbNqqKT8aV4NSF | ||||
Nqku5FmGN/yuuUfaDoM2Gpc+Q7BIyzITC/3nkheNBu6GHRdB9rC24mPXPqxh | ||||
C+FTcel2zqu2ppuDcbcCe0MRUBIom3vIRb9/CpUnLKmEmBAaGF0pnNdgkD3Q | ||||
Ed1LQkYxxxFCXg2Gs6bPxGKtgQgJYtpCTWAp6BYecjH54w+lgFmGEk/wW3Q8 | ||||
jt0yQnwu2eT1UjAjSTihBrBA8SjriBFT051hB8E5N7SiDTxhbC9xlwJ5DW3+ | ||||
vOcpIZ2EuTdjh2hBNi8/sIM/rTAvNya8CeEBAxdqW1zZSqu7WC/wPKEMacWh | ||||
ZmpSYRRS8qU117hdw0V9d0Sv6Xnvb+fLY8vZx0V21LfsjuG6+V7LJqGNQpJj | ||||
NeROOPDdN3yU0OBMH4StcxKoZ2UhAj3wrHy4gYZXSzg4nIuGAbV9DcKS8TZo | ||||
CcfVR9rL6bEcFC1O7EWD4OjTPZc31+XKbmHpxpKybGWPG4lrtNVKx+A7Pm7y | ||||
I88MMvXV1MOg2OIFLWd9imM+cSSojhlpxgzUphXPXQw2trhSBhqYAA03XiSr | ||||
ZBrrlo+xwmBrvnLRH1KvoKcUb8vBkIrzO8nZRq/0qUfyRC0Dm2jc9nCmRc7p | ||||
CvkibYQVbFWmyts6av4wdmXbxHwkI35hpi9M2Ht2r6SLuRSxnLJlQUXfc7CM | ||||
u8lzNptleHg6NzDpdFmElv2amevXZ5To7CyVZWPUGoDMolnGyanD+JzkCrYS | ||||
EVKO9Jw1q2zTVEiYktblFlYPgMqqRbWsJpjvRDL053DM5vMjr511uYHKJg+o | ||||
LC4RD9FrbIS7Ty3F5rSc48jsOLHyAd8gY6PZsCKlTASRayngA6qywtWiulvj | ||||
S0jZa5DCsQpWAjtrJ35AID8XtrDHtWI9D1gj7D11cHfTaRnZwPPu4zDo8Bb1 | ||||
9EoaeMc7yj5T15+UN9AMFAQOv+GD4J0NX8WfASGBDZbtkC6WlaR7/UUL0fZK | ||||
q9X9Rm3KgHdKQq8VjAJRqxSJOVZfEwyLqGqL+zhij1DBaK1EPxSQ1wmylE9k | ||||
QhDB0o3+TkZlNz/b2TT1qG8q50N/KEouDpiKphJ0MNouV17p+UVTToWAHYu/ | ||||
LNEfR/a6SUX0vtRUd+WIW+ESfZr79kJlZRkWaPEhNUv5QcAThl6UdrhFdfiH | ||||
pP9RrTrPOBH/Gq/ILpJseH33NipoI2ILkUINdAj+BOfETcpCS9Oj7gjOFiS3 | ||||
Z4yzE71xGEPrbsTGLXrpNHoZLG6FzLUsqL4UgGMR2MAD5JGmGOTTwlfBcfs+ | ||||
Iaqy3sCasmAHn/M15yOMyLZt2UF3wzVeli8o/U+xQVEMhF66LCcf5KR0t5TL | ||||
Tiq4JvUZz6r5BwBoMwSollMONIjMVFStPH6iRP7FEHqWLz/U61U7uUMCwkBo | ||||
fKyb1Gj9/nZCvD/Nz6VpflF8yLaH0Sqi1OEYuWWeTz5IQ8IY5Mne+tR+G/F4 | ||||
vpTfFlG4LepxWGupTEZxzqVfg0DTWt7N7K2TpMG216mPObwRR/NNEWdvaPUh | ||||
TydCkfKS6wsVoHoC3KRUqyGEN6DqpQmSMRHHL6JpgdezF0ol5CLzfT/F0SIJ | ||||
18FgJMtV+Z+LH2U8UZRP5vb+nWWKZIkjOiM+7fpJLC/U8Pncy8E47Qy+FGMt | ||||
YDnGhBcwPDs+Wq6Zl+LnrJ9PDVOCXbwAUg+xwIHiCrYsOrpdh71IsAkMA4wd | ||||
XXmLO6NEle5ia8Wt8xId5yswWNYV1E4YR/cBAwWly6O9g+P9w8fMdZ1enSzZ | ||||
sZQ3juH6AYtpund6qj1Xm6/xGBXKdpmZnQTDUXiwYRhIJmjq64pSFzz9LT2p | ||||
R2wWnkjj2kZy2hctxOsTQhXfrHhjY3Pcp/oMQ82XgPyq98d7AjkwFDB+MrY+ | ||||
kvyaRDewDrFGK1bDzVzttoph0f0eBuDPiw03c4KxKAdaophSFSu9JR/ErtJI | ||||
8oabvT8IRZzBWcuw76kD+st+VbOAIr9hJsbW3JeExVBDRhuYeqqQsQYracTY | ||||
kEzbPsyLtpjHI990S8aWYykZoWMYoQWp93J1Mw7FKUc6i5560YO5Ja0vRMNQ | ||||
uNpNJ+NG8xFp0M4BwsQgD1vQtbs1918J67KY5GvJLwB2gxFk7CBF3+277Kas | ||||
27UuPm3Px7tQMx92qxV+oT4A3UwzCKNybOyeDmTbJgpp6hHNJJtGHsV48XE5 | ||||
RKzXhX1YRChvtHa0cz8Xmyu/5SLv5SHNtrwszLTdXFE+KTwNDmsLBaeF040a | ||||
sleWVueyAJpXpNPuzCXKO/cvS+bXxZYKUueYdnMcpbqM24qbo6OCnJ4K23Ws | ||||
cQOFGbkHqMob9KeqoahxhG6I1ufri4bSpl2kT5LHRon3GwCjnqky1xPOEwqM | ||||
xZqNc8q6BbUanejzA6yUz/tDidnRWyTvhg2goW+Y7AMSmcZBEjaXQqFwVzS2 | ||||
ZlXf4ZYdAvtkxbvMVUOsJFb/Gfg8dOfqk1XH1xXBzBc3vpfRCbiKXOyDa+Bm | ||||
iKbx6wcCjsF6rAOIo8ILFwygsoZbTvwZvuhjQ+/3wJvOv5GztSR1d5GwlCTC | ||||
F2oBaPh+Iy131GfZuVSXCmgRUVZEeGgESGYD7FQRW3bllH0YIkR978PFmgFq | ||||
m4aRgYkPQScHF1hyX2erUY5Eu8FHcma/hNMuxnuHBwe2i/9x9icXjcpCWB3D | ||||
IQTZdYKlr4h2vowtOiDheiYuzvSRFUxOixGEtYYLXUzjBKrIrhawCWU6IYwT | ||||
UmRm8+pyW4JEjIxjyzoD4XoJbm7JTk9sIzd5b+a44ZweBO1LGxWvJHn93ONP | ||||
p/tUKBNgVrKCA9RKGfF3zR2uigAozsPj3b2HPfpk9yABs2t4D4PW6IOfpwxm | ||||
vi30GSLbsakSxa+BSR2DUvBUu0JN2Q/dQBQpMzJ1f1bi+foZO6PdZRFtKfd4 | ||||
MPfbluiU3Cn9EGEUDqUXYtcWjFmPsWOAgrwlzqdwIiexI+qU1Ejerf2doWPM | ||||
wj8CTYnUyt39oZYkvSEFdPfBW1R47GzZ1VjDOkJvNHHmkoqDPC9IIX3z2Eu+ | ||||
Ix2ioiTujejtUuuyO9rdP3a7o9UIf/MWnsSoD7TCnz75Nr2fh53mlca+xdJS | ||||
g8mIFt0fRWAOM8dc3EscS3H02a8JDACI6H3g22pyECHZb3w8zSEKHF271HKD | ||||
AnyLVCpLqqxDVUUE058AipjKZsg+XkQZ1g0XnNytCjdhwD2SLsEVHMFXTeHY | ||||
ibQZvwljbqbGhmnm80xTlKgkaCjEZQKJadzB+S9rvTTIdd+zIIt7ecAdYo4w | ||||
4S+GVoW2QyEzSNmmRHI4IqKeOl9ENLTZhLwMpX2T7hyu6eqNXg7z0lsFRLzg | ||||
3JQ09LW0uIZvbKXGnGDLMgIZS4Ng4+dNGRsRiE85FLuzo8wQdQH6S2duuolg | ||||
glrDXswe5RbUINK5l6+z3e9Oz74/e/eLQecUhnSPThNjdu5HsSwJVTWWXb2h | ||||
aXvHdZSyHgqfXGd3m65vtGy3I7jbC7hPiu+kZnXs8bjmhV90eWuM66jrqVmN | ||||
3QpltS5FypqGu0X1CmSVcZZ0iGokEPriSsRDf7Tvv89/Llriv8M4oCtwAuhK | ||||
jaLzGz9KuBBQTTVbxthZCLvGx/5O+mYieZ5bGoWDvMpXyJzm+vQ8pdogtvzQ | ||||
kczrKzhYQwjBhqW7Z5LDUHm/8olUHbORdRd49l0+BV4/59zLLYKTnbaZxYGQ | ||||
oxHSV9NkJG3zSLYGyAOKw2eVzmlzEq+pcWLZ4CuEtfMogh0N2phcZLNof9Na | ||||
nz72fZQSoZ4wviB3OjjCziT6cBMcIYjMbZhQ9vynftajcmqSPnyy4fwVufmQ | ||||
DvnxBOi8Tx4NJ0DVlX/36F9v4n1d0+Gh7zqc9hoeut5Rj+ndHGeqyy7yYdqC | ||||
OO5AHEbOvDyqXtrahXjUk6RsyxdK2912K3Y7NhdXPdXcREr6j9wkkE8JHAIr | ||||
+0jY39sfXZZcLbGobkQFoM+kD6N8/0C/5yxe/VryYcT0oNdJC4eQtcQhT6lD | ||||
llnBgWJBO03o4d6S1llmKHugidoRgr+NvknHrcMe2agxGvtMc91t1wU+/Asx | ||||
TzmULyVEdKLI6p++4ftGEjn6DDxY9eUb9jrbwtJHbFZrvqEtd3p8h+LoRD+p | ||||
yyJJ08SwOXY/q2KwPUvsQ6mSWSA5d+ByHcepDGZqHtLAfYbdKhrDTHUdRPmA | ||||
AC3OQVmGqDmbodu7SFOLQ5tTqVhb2KUKRsMztZxaPN4mxQvVSOhqJi1dpSmr | ||||
62SnHvtlE5/DJQtPeASRX8xQLq1CKdPZY2UE2pT3r935IybGR5q9POy03tgw | ||||
BL2imThtOFyQboE6qrUlh6J9WDlQCAC3nhblICp5KjgIPf4qXcRkYF5kaQsC | ||||
8xEpfv6S3q4pQqQzbgfjiCUAWeTzQjONHOeyRyioEoLhfPZgEujIl8GPlxZi | ||||
LUhd6gb15J6n8q9y868J5sHqaGi687utjkoodY9HO3tg+bsHR/z0cX7sLlkV | ||||
bcZEXx9+Jc//QqN5pxcQ7xeWZfUoAsbhWbGf5Gavebe117yEIXWzaZW7nId/ | ||||
fnY+5cDcb3qZltxIbwlxL4X8K05/D5KZwcVNkYeSNo3l8iaOooftkB0kxicV | ||||
f36eRVR5H1BVtbgaDbhzYUdREIcL/33QTNF4kgs4YsUvPPFFrmwrsF7IvAFh | ||||
z6+wwP81NHTEMGDj3ePEhd4iTo/UEc2Fvqfa408q/l6E6gl8nGDgStkHABT/ | ||||
iTbPQuY36eu+6LEOoe0/Jbiwr6KQp0G76SGKWloj20zhWw2MJFKwvXEfjBqX | ||||
OsCkJqTH9pCBl/aOJJcwgnHj0nffHikuyl9UUxY72hC06Yygr/pEjJ/F2K/z | ||||
wnBrGl//WdZc4qGQNux64+d5KN4l3KmsXUd5vqzdYYLcNgjBOIVD8/hQ2Ucg | ||||
jJRzeEzFaumUDimUhvgOkKV3R8RLE7/N77guUxWqJDtA25R11GqeABkBDcZm | ||||
4YNk/IiKbLZGvVsVQ++59tbComjzqaDoahmCvAJgxJO7yXyzb1M/RDmNa1gW | ||||
Qt4Au0r2S7l9V332oX/G32XHhwqdIoJfNsR//dQ2jOkP5gaUBRCV7EeHqoZm | ||||
RUp4XdIjAQiHR/reyrKDyG5sEpcHv9CrZj7bBm/mvqmiWmD04wyFD4EYOurY | ||||
Bny0+WBCUMAWQzfMfEre1vIwzhc//Pj+1SmICJHuYqqd2bVeh+N+5YLrQVmH | ||||
XOY35Yx5mSJLdE5fpKjydNO9UAADcdnxC0Ot3FxPxEhArD1RGDtKXF1+MaDf | ||||
r+b5HVRHGU9n41LNORClDsVcbBgLR2BtgXwNYkxzjepluNqDQCQCxHnYMOtv | ||||
6Rit7/He48efPyf4vXmTVm/5sLsOZhOAobsmqAaybAcRCZ3NqOwbd++yjLOT | ||||
DUhcHWw6sdrni0jmEdK0mP9O1rU12pbKGP3X3jU4Crtqh3CUcZa+MJLwIUnO | ||||
9oh/Rh/aThyFPQlfcnz7aAMczBxz5y+e//j69Ys3py9OvWO2KbJ0LsSaijoq | ||||
u4BezAqMixlH1qcd7S6jxBuTpmHSWAl5vS6C+8yVwXO+ET8p3apQH7HRXjZW | ||||
AT59Q/KCb/rskqyoRKwFiuHjt63hqfZaE5ffFljTsKJJpwpFbuJspzhaxoYH | ||||
NBgRUNaCM2o9Hq9kFdD0k2ayzuyUoeYtaMcsMszhkQ96QKSwJaCpbcgQSvC1 | ||||
mSw9yLYFdZDgtUwSvCyjPYVmN98MVLdkVzZg432qfYofzw5B7x7FS/KOk1eb | ||||
t8Im6KAGIRQNLjUpAuxGFkmRON3H4zddq6e4vS46nSk5jYF7tZs/OA2/R9MX | ||||
H7+JdWZZietwa6k1kcZ9NiOfP2gsiU8mgl6N6HZr8116/GxNko+kSdJhLnIm | ||||
sI4S97mwtuNAyeH0Lsai9d1dPWOKeyYsFU0HQjNU7wPiUvSDeFAu9oQNA352 | ||||
5IGJEt00v0t8a4IigoPUuvTEShpD1Ff7hh9UTcBqowI2DUq1EMbeVLZD9lTh | ||||
n9llyDv6YBsQpP9PDOo+v8uu5z8G23pNpk+ONbz7D2DoWJFQsD83dlXnpPkr | ||||
2S1jPgMGfDUlkcHKbZmbNG4UlHFP474LPE6q7XrIjIlQb6w9jj0ZLMgW2FQ6 | ||||
jERCLhqf2ii/jUNTHlw/xdbPdAG+hK4PxpGyjVDgu7xLxh0wgDw7SWoWVQu2 | ||||
sImWQUXvicggmUbKGfO4n8BqLb0/rEMFc72wvFW9wQX5JZw+q60Vo0gLXibf | ||||
r3xmcvD7BmXe7CQjko0moeq86VIlaCDqusCoFBM4J5ZZjE8hnS18J+ooiqOq | ||||
nIcH8baLudX6VilAkiByV7QW+NT03bq6Q3zfYowHu4jc7+8c7+79wTsWnvRc | ||||
x/vXtZtZ+zvHo6J2O/s7D3Yf4JGceOB293ohf+VeBsVPQu56eM7ukwd7DzCY | ||||
oUMCwyHaJ+FBQKERyovz1ripqGA0FKFnijQtoWV4Z4wr0TrCuEJqtu5O75gj | ||||
r2jQuNvzxnPj5Kxu4d+eKD1CncbQvR4NGmBj09H6PHjyZKBIabk00Uuwsoba | ||||
BZ1XXN2luQevs/y6Ddlxr2GERopz28bEG+JgSaZ+5bjuQW1Ba6tu8V6fJmDa | ||||
wZZeJshE5VPu2zVH8MYfabNgtzddUK4vGFNkNUQeFrKpRmxUGeixqMNOF27r | ||||
Pn+p25GUwwhmc+rYB22lrsl7myKxBZweu2RHYmCXBJW/dz4+HWNgO7sPcIJw | ||||
ftwSiTtAfrODZ5kTXzxGp+NXswbPcjs4QHKGsqWdoYSzblO+3S/yiF4cdek+ | ||||
Rsfqudev4jg4E2+lSwvpgZrXEpeKsrtVEbDr0G54O1l7I0ooOhAaLvGpCz6b | ||||
b6DxQJwVARxJHpl1T4pAAlo5iPciG7SrtQxwsQqpnm4iE02H6Jfjwigl6ZYu | ||||
4ZFovuwFkAn//yOt6mK9WOS1zzxJ/cfvdaHecN6+CYt58bEnH61yYqCfvolB | ||||
uv8JJ7L3JR/fC0v79f/R+T3OkmYhuZ/OeaHhNEwi65NhPUgnt/STw1NG2Zuz | ||||
U80A2vjm4kK/8UxtKRnk/6JJqAYNTD3NQQKEXc8PCZD7Ogjnwjh5HqZ9/1br | ||||
KYv12048LHDS2pObdEEBHTGv/00n2j01UTnKv3auyUvSCY+4b5VYWsnn6Pc8 | ||||
cG7z2qfZ3nf5/Go0rdrO17gFAVH98jdfu7BPv9nKRa94Km3h/tL7Qy/qPPIT | ||||
ffBvvRS5/6fffuo8lN9q0vzwp1GyIA6Fuajwu2V2E9kc9UTsDH77OW8r2/rX | ||||
TvwXAaXcP4QhFIM+RefDJTfEXyjixH/jUerUs//LV/bX1D+75JJoWVJPw3/j | ||||
6hi9/1ar85WVEveXCTi1XaLFChmH/S+nHIJQQzKyc/HV/nmjqr22Z34xZ/k3 | ||||
PP6cPPGbHf2vyuZx/uv/RuqL2rn9VrP/FQ1Lf7t5+ibAv9Ekf70b+ksOaNd5 | ||||
hpxK56KLk4/+WxUjc9r+ZmqRvQDK4D7NK8+++wsauBUfW3z3Ey3UwXeP8QVN | ||||
Xz7L6GK9dK+Pa/mP/wa9YXs7qH+5hOs0OtMOPDhD0lYrjW18ucOZ+4ruWo6/ | ||||
Chz6+m5Fa/2VHbxc+L7zhK9r2MW43d1bv7qDlwvfp4/47SU5zuW/XHyHwz4q | ||||
m4o28z9FMI/IfPhJxDZ/8TS7Q94TiH9RLYH0PMKFd87x5/T9gQhT+ZYOl/yJ | ||||
Kq8s/Ons2fTRd32cIlo/qJvwSv7rD9SJ5JIOQ8UAB8HXvK5RBuq/bFnh/7AE | ||||
VqaPeH70rx+HXOr/fMqn7UEGC41+/hv//D3//E/+ecw/h/zzv3p6u04E69v7 | ||||
Dl9lvf/RixQDIU8dCGlA2Xc6IhdRbvx1tCO0v6D2oEPdc53unLNPwlUPkE8r | ||||
X9CnWJOafZQPsvVqJb/Lt7hYbqPvmE4grJYw2afOhRufZt9+fLg7enRinOhY | ||||
njrib08unp+dZXMUP6GqJh/9TKPyb+KbD3ZHh9HN/OXWm09G/4dulqFkvL7f | ||||
ftzfGe0/CTcjMMYBKfRColt2Rk/oFh21bMm3vWzvhxf/QY9xTv6lT21+PJqD | ||||
h/wbTerhQ3rmNelx0fOGJ6OXw3x0Rc8V+pHHjpgI/i///B3/fMo/+/xz4F1c | ||||
iA29NSg6cJHUdXniS9e+3j9pWbV35t5P3DOdlFoAAQVs9X+mr7Bz75ecmrPp | ||||
jRx2u9tkKdJeVc9Iuv3MfzrG19WoqJQ2pBPA3vky0CgtUIIB78/fBKSapPag | ||||
0tYI0Si6rcJLab6CMLkfQpIxOpm8e3XKTaIsAEF/v8n676qVgtGfSp9c7N4A | ||||
HRrwbfyZT0KJ59wMOl26pKKb4/Wa57ne6tETj1mnNnalDAupmFXTjJzNWOrd | ||||
LF7XJsnrwBH4Y/Rk2pVzLkCpc+4RukmPv5I4TpCPuX3ph9ziGSSh2KeMESSZ | ||||
cs3kukCJGFcCRD2r7xsr5w/Ha2sBNuDDcBjDCTagz1FIBbhgL1lBUn/TZWnE | ||||
JdHKjTK95NWWfcaFIUz13k/jGJDUDHO0LPr0iV6GDR1J5Q/37kJlEudI5Stp | ||||
6dGduQu7JCgAvsfIaaEU/OIjcVDujJMEFlvGx555cFZxjW8cNRpDlFwkMRzS | ||||
JKeCvouZuXzTs9sNWVZJpE465Qp0gCxOZoUil/Vxk1fjVb6eVwBnoL9RJdyM | ||||
Z/TCsukZ0poWSSnOo2Y8GNY9ZsKEGpq+eTerIGbmMwVORzZL1MtrK31KkVmS | ||||
tBt/7fT8aX5wROe4495DFSgyiyjSbRYrr+qSI10BiGUTFZQzeQSBUAvB1Mk1 | ||||
SJzZCmRlMWNfhtkBZ6SHWH71NtpNiDykQIapceWYT+7dckpma8CCYs6uAwEe | ||||
ZdkPo5ozj9YaAZW7aLuSY0cvkRXd4sHnY8B5kM6yZhrSMYAHxLkrxpFFBy2X | ||||
kikErMy5JkzlN1U59RmAUuwGlF99VhycrjiqKoAGulUGEMdLVXJw0jf9ADq7 | ||||
LzTj8G5U7c7b20iVgZSfR40RXICU4tVeS6kgOMaoXI443yCVMCE11jig1Kzm | ||||
C034mAGFU+gQTJebJ3Dq8AI5gblk8zfEm5etgL+N8luUzyYt1sKWYiGIVNCb | ||||
pLIGMb94GLSfHgSvddlLGlM1ocigU5ph5XxbsGwcF2SRJotm4nceKRYBc2aO | ||||
8dGGVHxZLgO2XRgxJ35MIfNJ9mPcavFG49b0Oheo3Uv/iDCTBoJpaoOjHbPx | ||||
CbISP5PBjrm7a7KCnD7AIXSFP+VHaOOwOL/LBrHRG5WTTTbi7JLfLBUuMjGe | ||||
O5c0WHl+ADlF7D/BUEcYgokn7jnTxaCcJMmHLGPu7YUYrRG9j7jjDRO7h8+T | ||||
UtIoy3YhObhcU5uiQwQpoZDLlaZICMFi+6PGQ++9/nRfhdhZVM9vBQqdwDzO | ||||
0AY6sdsapu0mB27uV5SQfg8ztLraiOD8Yw34r9vvQfDRK0muTCCgfD90f2Y+ | ||||
fbI0lc+fmSRd2im+v1VGbZdOOjyUuOgLLr8sQ9EZQbN0OCNK8Gim/JHTvBg5 | ||||
W9xk7I0WcvA2yvm5Vzqzvsmp+lOFrfAsxmtLchhojKJiCgkJPBN69kUvl11g | ||||
sSgZSoLUTlII3KnQZHKcviAZxqIzb21skRByEHeafolK8UXRKsBiyP4JKkBs | ||||
CuDMqruMXsNVPL74ncbtYpj30CZBQjVqcgwVvtssNlaEW2lviX01Iamev5gq | ||||
hgGobCkVeINhdrku59NGxD8NM8rvG0eHkNNoJ9fcOAyzIEuBoZGzfIaz22rC | ||||
VZvPq9ma0/usmoZz//QQ8K6l5/wtHPkNIzACdZ9VJRFoX2f0qDIaPQWsNWIN | ||||
U+7L0lhSO+k1eYKj4xLgPKkVVuQcHOapgbIzcxNCnlUhU4oYqxO7SdMEvRYS | ||||
bTuLrHSIYN21phg1YdFD5p+tGY6SaLux3oFLnr8575InTru+H1ymvS62GKLb | ||||
+N+xlQdqFVPKJGM3ga7jZd6UTeAoy9mIu1Wy0e46BnZlYHrCNfsqEtmcF7Pd | ||||
JyYGZiq4Hh7u6j79M6qOUncCYmySn0cHEjmQ5XLNVbE4tyXKDIdeLIoEl51p | ||||
kmvUyvFNhrOExUWzMj4qVTTljYgQFPHOYK+JIbMFv6ms460ReECR+5EmqrgH | ||||
aevq7U2Mu4bCu1DQKZWh97G0VDYz55a3ah0lZ9ly61yU1urqkqgSIaN56tGa | ||||
awqx8RNbO+0WzNX04qYdZ2+l0ZCiooSGaJOEEQxdpIVMuQGO8VcpNE416FQi | ||||
szZCb17P27RGmZj2tdZQh9l3duoqrpMhW++mmDfxvnsEHAUhsg6g0IKRhi0Y | ||||
xyr5YdInIi1futRSsW5dd9aC4LqcXTPWZFPW0kFZ5S+scWS0Xt5p5iqNHYsG | ||||
oQyxCAgnJig1eyL0rISiQ95rzOyCj0LELEqAYyaJa1XRZOmPJm8My3nHeJ78 | ||||
Qlhp+WWlj4qxQbE063kjVHrWsa7tmZk9k/aM0Rx5v7kguZnQdwCLzZczMDlf | ||||
GeFdnFMY06rHKfVybyYxlf8uuepslm7Z7/bL4iSYxHSAeSg0i/MCZUWF9m8J | ||||
/OI89ON9K+6SX5H5KgxIm1ZlJ+jiBnjGyH92wRr8VzoH5XFt3nwI9YV+dPBh | ||||
ltpplFf/yjNWqYyBmIusGvUVe2dOAOmR5qwmJc5YhSnacZY9k4LVGkVYfLvY | ||||
H/pCZSOxDqlUXJezqobFDndiseR6DD4LBba/EMcKiZtFySiv1uvi9M3FcJtN | ||||
4HyvYEM3iFkX9tMmh24qGdwFhfDscrlat/ChGA451+xBJhs2MtxwqHtNOpKL | ||||
BewiTBPNf6sW/EHxkZH05cC5CPJW6Jq+bsabqAi+7zHztSYFui4WKNEseRfy | ||||
7IoWgBk9d96sLuHh9A16p+y4NIAfsQhRicuYkBrXxVZExId+0KIG3FbAEp8y | ||||
uDDZnkHnPIJJeQ0hwOuWNECmjUm89ErFAnSRu8CyNslT14RFFG3W+/NXjY92 | ||||
CIx36/R8JrS50JEY22ZCMNSdOXd2sa64WoYWMKe8dqHKNq0qFId1EzWpV28Z | ||||
reWEVsxstfOXz/cPdg6Qo69u8ZZBQJS8sA5vTt6+O3ckJdFQyJ1sO5E4GKZM | ||||
dE+t2DXwr6oL08X9Hud3I9F9ucpNaks70utUHuy1mU2sST4kKtXWS6kXzuHr | ||||
sf7kZrdFqpp6hoOUKesvjJqh+IQqmQLq4OLQsqmtQS4ovzw4r29b98ziI9u2 | ||||
2sR+WU7GZev64vUv6b2fPw9kISua1s9R1bdQbDTSPhf+5nPQFcCQ6NHjdb0c | ||||
5/Uq7w01kCDbfIinMrgVm/Pmjy9ii97l0+tCylTuiUGE6hOvKyvW1GXNYABu | ||||
U7kxI5fDEERT8XFTUsMDAWrJNcquQ01z85LatDU4p05/X4DIiJkCa1/HOWa8 | ||||
7fQ+soG0QJcU6LKDMsewBApNqE6yI56SdAOWPkE41Ld5PW2MikgMywbZrdgA | ||||
0nHyaTUmhW98KQ3/XpUfCjSPt3aVcdvhTYDSTrAhoKh5b3A6QgNxMsnJpGuu | ||||
tbB8RExOKRC7oKzUnrg5cJ6Yzr9am6/ORdRniyGeCuHXzYb55YGF1NYL0+F6 | ||||
5qZclBAJt/mdVZXex02IfSjVPUgsLLRgV9V3c4E0gFTNq97AxdvnVybaQF2H | ||||
vBrxHfEesucTC2eLIYfRYwFzGntchQWKCgInxsL4dmQ5ByGfhe12M4e4il5w | ||||
H1W7Ee5Cj8QWvn/3cvRYjEm2yjAqZtFDFRaNKJJEnRwuQRAqIBiu1ss73BsD | ||||
SzKTOHz8ZPfzZzpSDLbWaPUppmL8/929Ohl6fWmbAAhdD0pBo0MH8HkxnYlc | ||||
dn02nZpQlup9MlxFZyYmt5MPfIJtAi+Bq6v2Vj1rPDQeZPqeAAz43J7faCta | ||||
G//9aimcGaZDefdIuZRQykSgCtVguGLAKIbDVUQP3yt86OS2WBuzh7Rp+W8T | ||||
NF4FtDQB76SRybrh3rcSfUJvyXU5b4MChlrjuBeBdSDn7ntsnYRx8otkDqby | ||||
qa5XWiW8tUbw7mQ6w7TZvkkES2EI2uF9hmPY1aFXx1zucWfyOdfLXgooLvq/ | ||||
zWaMusX+/FKBveaAQmYKh5lJuqAoiiL3fYtgT44q1TXw6isLY7efRM9FtouW | ||||
Ky1jrHcWR96cB9/A/lnyaYoekyaTdOI0FhZOkjQbDxfiJyuSSfFyNv26tqqN | ||||
7wYTLWrwCOSd6HqEc5CWiCo2jzOnHjM1G8q5GR3PiuscbtEvZ/8gEFY3iin1 | ||||
//q6lt22sRi6v18heDYJoBhtMbtZuZ0HXCRp4aSY2cqPJJo6UiDLE7hfPzx8 | ||||
XUpWumiBNo4s3ctLHh5Sh56wqJaWq5NylESQHdf/k/3EandlEYdeoV1OL4Jh | ||||
q54/O+pVauN+0gDsNnwBATBiOdd41fHqrP1RtgFi1M1/XO11j8Sqy+3zLqQT | ||||
lstT9Gqb2ngfL96SMXMd9Sjws9p0bXN6JgdBKKXKbrZar0FJ2yg43J53bUXQ | ||||
wB6jTGRYlNp02/qHz+ca1lNyTdiPrb3/kyKdYaWYWE92wdkodxWXPOx3j3CV | ||||
HXE+bTIDWdUKLSiqmmsccGyv4Fs/ABO9HJVt35CyhEoEBeQ7n0trXQy8MW4r | ||||
wR0qUAy+l3Bq9svcJIQJrQwHyuJpd5TWB7TZdC2O54WnlJpOJ8WTl4OZyAA0 | ||||
dtWYKF/IrGcT6zOE4GWxPHZtYEQDA71UtVXVtd2KYm+1/01AR/F0JHcDt7zV | ||||
enq+gTzWZmZ3t51xjYQwiUYPmXrcqzXqAclXUG8bxN9NTrIXWR51u2xkLL80 | ||||
cg1akD4eslewsx8TgsTsrGS6XHyqBwpLYWS1R0q/VCktlwDaQvKyyDYvdNPX | ||||
XRhTR4hc5mYKcxfGfpuOx+Etz4ZR6bw26x1GMEGYC5kLv7If5L3kl01KchAt | ||||
RLvciolmC8NY4RkZJ6aqDAguak45+Fv3bJv0E7fGcbVMzH7Snu1KJ2iAxOTC | ||||
Pg3edYtzCGdR6By/QpJFz0SgfPwYscjHHV08bMlf6Cj9ZX9Tqhm0V4xXH0Ke | ||||
zdaIFYkUv8wyiE6x82AUXaLzrvV5v62W5C+qR7Zo+mFad+0r4RxplaFPIkLu | ||||
yLgRjkelv7e7be0XhiUCqQQz0yZnWKqOI+6GHS3bRwhrzCbRDdso+WKRJWIO | ||||
b3xbFkxLSuY94RBszmdGb1uZiUKpBvIZdcHoxhjKl5VpLeHr5J/1L+cA0rF4 | ||||
G95YPYzGsgjjak8ppWCm4ckSCNRK/zQehhANv9NRsmYQ+sm704sQCTCQRC5m | ||||
cbsYbQU0AUGaTG2J/gLzhdrhE4TUJ2mbM01YOnYvMqqv5wF92JIPc28O4H/j | ||||
C9YYEzmoqygcVEF35INZbkIr+6fAyZHRivrk+18pDxvCWBGyxbmUoYGR+4wZ | ||||
GSf1cnro3F21Dw9nXZ1S6jL5QCb4jHthXK9Oy7gCuu35YvV1oSyli5JHqmnO | ||||
bxstb/Vqxft37/BXUcxm+c8k7TUfSKtNfyZLHgn+5p/hScCwMVGVt+XDZZFU | ||||
MXuSWxmwCVMGUChFyE1yRjm+AiixO0iLjeeZMpVuuiiiYzz9CkGxGE1h3KfS | ||||
fHfvfzi+8KiPjnPURACIQaY4Wk9FpITT6wj6U54g+AhQo3pnfHqD5OE/N9cm | ||||
KdfDwO4Wq3vK8q28xi0cO0nHMYbneFDdQY3lMgu7arzt6O+248j5F8H1lzSb | ||||
luuUTNi7Bxzcw5XN8KGljD1NGAi9WzYrpMcUElngyWtcxtuiY447j+juvy5v | ||||
+WwMFvmVj8RuzcwBFoOQspAj94QGP3bHjYaaXefj6g3jXPOtLgMnuVSo7bTr | ||||
p7ZrkN59a7i0i3WEPtjd5qnF/EfsmLws0GjjjMRiYHkl4aMFYC3R4Cho9Vj3 | ||||
tHEpLr3OzAMg3HMaSOug3upBFEm76gEFq7gGsCuAJ510wiAJFnZDCJwS26b4 | ||||
8lL/S5G4uPj9SMi1uNEpT3jGu+DH02cZ6SmvJrA6bbU/cjnLzA+2cR4ftCTv | ||||
i6BC9XL34eYFcAz69nLzwvMzQUBm0io6f3wFWin6T8oAij8+XS959c6/HOla | ||||
Bc1g0Qxq0+e2aovFfk2RCq0OxZc9bV3dVcV1jfcHoiaoEqEUQvang/HB6WNX | ||||
/ahhosWf2t0ukx1LOwuLvq/3FRlYtzmAOCgHMDaUDxCZ6YkrtDDncoP0+u+2 | ||||
g1WVVSIYnniLz91HfqlDjwaTAFgG6NPWORNND1ENOLx6wBmjP8SqxQoVqxoY | ||||
ausUB5+JNH0mLn56Gi5LazcV8WyrfWQtttF52xxAPXCeWDAa2lOW18ME3ERS | ||||
5fm1vCWQ18U/mhd2ylyTpCUY4nWo9hFmPoMb7cV2HmE5xTVlxbR5tN1d19Ie | ||||
89soYZn3p7GN+67JwfT8KewbfeXV1RXB6M13iiH/AypYH+8GZwEA | ||||
Some examples from this document: | ||||
Example 1 (from Section 3.4): | ||||
Original: | ||||
(e.g., | ||||
the Italian term "sanitU+00E0" replaced into "sanita", the French | ||||
term "ministU+00E8re" replaced into "ministere"), in case by | ||||
transliteration (e.g. "MU+00FCnchen" replaced into "muenchen”). | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
For example, | ||||
the Italian term "sanità” is replaced by "sanita", the French | ||||
term "ministère” is replaced by "ministere”, and | ||||
"München” is replaced by “muenchen” (transliteration). | ||||
Example 2 (from Section 3.4): | ||||
Original: | ||||
- unicode = urn:lex:de:stadt.mU+00FCnchen:rundschreiben: ... | ||||
Perhaps no changes are needed when the U+ notation appears in a "urn:lex" | ||||
string like this. | ||||
--> | --> | |||
</rfc> | <!-- [rfced] Sourcecode | |||
a) We updated <artwork> to <sourcecode type="abnf"> in Section 8. We also | ||||
updated the ABNF snippets throughout the document from <artwork> to | ||||
<sourcecode type="abnf">. Please review. | ||||
b) In Section 2.1, we changed the following from <artwork> to | ||||
<sourcecode>. Please confirm that this is correct. If so, should the "type" | ||||
attribute be set? | ||||
Original: | ||||
"urn:lex:" NSS | ||||
Note: The current list of preferred values for "type" is available here: | ||||
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types. If this list | ||||
does not contain an applicable type, then feel free to let us know. Also, it | ||||
is acceptable to leave the "type" attribute not set. | ||||
c) In Section 5.8, we changed the following from <artwork> to | ||||
<sourcecode>. We set the type to "abnf", but please confirm this is | ||||
correct. We do not see this in Section 8. | ||||
Original: | ||||
URN-reference = URN-document ["~" partition-id] | ||||
d) In Section 8, please review the spacing. For example, would you like to add | ||||
a blank line after the "alf-dot" definition and remove one of the blank lines | ||||
after the "alfa" definition? Or is the current spacing okay? | ||||
Original: | ||||
alf-dot = alfanum *alfadot | ||||
alf-dot-hyp = alfanum *(alfadot / "-") | ||||
alf-dot-oth = alfanum *(alfadot / other) | ||||
alfadot = alfanum / "." | ||||
alfa = lowercase / uppercase | ||||
alfanum = alfa / DIGIT / encoded | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
alf-dot = alfanum *alfadot | ||||
alf-dot-hyp = alfanum *(alfadot / "-") | ||||
alf-dot-oth = alfanum *(alfadot / other) | ||||
alfadot = alfanum / "." | ||||
alfa = lowercase / uppercase | ||||
alfanum = alfa / DIGIT / encoded | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] We see some mismatches between the ABNF snippets in the document | ||||
and the corresponding lines in Section 8. Please review and let us know | ||||
how/if to update. | ||||
a) NSS/NSS-lex definition | ||||
Section 2.1: | ||||
NSS = jurisdiction ":" local-name | ||||
Section 8: | ||||
NSS-lex = jurisdiction ":" local-name | ||||
b) date-iso definition | ||||
Section 3.6: | ||||
date-iso = yyyy-mm-dd | ||||
Section 8: | ||||
date-iso = year "-" month "-" day | ||||
c) date definition - note the spaces after "[" and before "]" in Section 3.6 | ||||
that don't appear in Section 8. | ||||
Section 3.6: | ||||
date = date-iso [ "|" date-loc ] | ||||
Section 8: | ||||
date = date-iso ["|" date-loc] | ||||
d) manifestation definition | ||||
Section 5.7: | ||||
manifestation = editor ":" format | ||||
[":" component [":" feature]] | ||||
Section 8: | ||||
manifestation = format ":" editor | ||||
[":" component [":" feature]] | ||||
e) numbers definition | ||||
Section 6.3.4: | ||||
numbers = document-id *("," document-id) | ||||
Section 8: | ||||
numbers = (document-id *("," document-id)) / number-lex | ||||
f) version definition - note the indent of second line | ||||
Section 7.1.2: | ||||
version = (amendment-date / specification) | ||||
*(";" (event-date / event)) | ||||
Section 8: | ||||
version = (amendment-date / specification) | ||||
*(";" (event-date / event)) | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] We updated some <artwork> to <ul>. We have noted these instances | ||||
below along with further edits made to each. Please review these in all | ||||
output formats (txt, html, pdf) and let us know any concerns. | ||||
a) Section 3.4: We updated the following <artwork> to be nested lists (<ul>), | ||||
with just the "urn:lex" part tagged as <artwork>. We also made the following | ||||
changes: | ||||
- replaced the "=" with ":" | ||||
- updated capitalization (of ascii, unicode, and utf-8, and punycode) | ||||
- updated the text starting with "assuming that..." to be a note in the | ||||
<aside> element. | ||||
Original: | ||||
a circular adopted by the Municipality of Munich (Rundschreiben der | ||||
Stadt MU+00FCnchen): | ||||
- ascii = urn:lex:de:stadt.munchen:rundschreiben:... | ||||
- unicode = urn:lex:de:stadt.mU+00FCnchen:rundschreiben:... | ||||
- utf-8 = urn:lex:de:stadt.m%xC3%xBCnchen:rundschreiben:... | ||||
- punycode = urn:lex:de:stadt.xn-mnchen-3ya:rundschreiben:... | ||||
a state law of the Russian Federation (latin: gosudarstvo zakon; | ||||
cyrillic: U+0441U+043EU+0441U+0442U+043EU+044FU+043DU+0438U+0435 | ||||
U+0437U+0430U+043AU+043EU+043D): | ||||
- ascii = urn:lex:ru:gosudarstvo:zakon:... | ||||
- unicode = urn:lex:ru:U+0441U+043EU+0441U+0442U+043EU+044FU+043D | ||||
U+0438U+0435:U+0437U+0430U+043AU+043EU+043D:... | ||||
- utf-8 = urn:lex:ru:%xD1%x81%xD0%xBE%xD1%x81%xD1%x82%xD0%xBE%xD1 | ||||
%x8F%xD0%xBD%xD0%xB8%xD0%xB5:%xD0%xB7%xD0%xB0%xD0%xBA | ||||
%xD0%xBE%xD0%xBD:... | ||||
- punycode = urn:lex:ru:xn-80aebe3cdmfdkg:xn-80ankme:... | ||||
assuming that the Russia jurisdiction-code is expressed | ||||
in ASCII ("ru"), | ||||
while the Cyrillic version ("U+0440U+0444") has the | ||||
puny-code "xn-p1ai". | ||||
b) Section 3.6: We updated the following <artwork> to be <ul>, with just the | ||||
character strings tagged <artwork>. We also removed the semicolon after the | ||||
first item, the close parentheses and period after the second item, and the | ||||
quotation marks. | ||||
Original: | ||||
- in Hebrew characters: | ||||
"U+05DBU+05F4U+05D0.U+05D0U+05B1U+05DCU+05D5U+05BCU+05DC.U+05EA | ||||
U+05E9U+05E0U+05F4U+05D8"; | ||||
- in UTF-8 code: | ||||
"%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x42%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x46%x34%x5c%x75%x30%x35 | ||||
%x44%x30%x2e%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x30%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x42%x31%x5c | ||||
%x75%x30%x35%x44%x43%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x35%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x42 | ||||
%x43%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x43%x2e%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x45%x41%x5c%x75 | ||||
%x30%x35%x45%x39%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x45%x30%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x46%x34 | ||||
%x5c%x75%x30%x35%x44%x38"). | ||||
c) Section 5.4: We updated the following <artwork> to be <ul>, with just | ||||
the "urn:lex" parts tagged as <artwork>. | ||||
Original: | ||||
- 4/59 Judgment of the EEC Court of Justice 04/04/1960, Mannesmann | ||||
AG and others / ECSC High Authority | ||||
urn:lex:eec.lex.arpa:court.justice:judgement:1960-04-04;4-59 | ||||
- 4/59 Order of the EEC Court of Justice 18/05/1960, Mannesmann AG | ||||
and others / ECSC High Authority | ||||
urn:lex:eec.lex.arpa:court.justice:order:1960-05-18;4-59 | ||||
d) Section 5.7: We updated the following <artwork> to be <ul>, with just the | ||||
"urn:lex" parts tagged as <artwork>. We also removed the quotation marks | ||||
around the "urn:lex" parts. | ||||
Original: | ||||
- PDF format (vers. 1.7) of the whole act edited by the Italian | ||||
Parliament: | ||||
"urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$application-pdf; | ||||
1.7:parlamento.it" | ||||
- XML format (version 2.2 DTD NIR) of the text of the act and PDF | ||||
format (version 1.7) of the "Figura 1" (figure 1) contained in the | ||||
body, edited by the Italian Senate: | ||||
"urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$text-xml;dtd-nir-2.2: | ||||
senato.it:testo" | ||||
"urn:lex:it:stato:legge:2000-04-03;56$application-pdf;1.7: | ||||
senato.it:figura.1" | ||||
e) Section 5.7: We removed the close parentheses at the end of this artwork | ||||
block. We also removed the quotation marks. | ||||
Original: | ||||
"urn:lex:eu:tribunal.justicia:sentencia:2009-06-11;33-08 | ||||
@original:es$text-html:juradmin.eu;jurifast:todo:anonimo") | ||||
Current: | ||||
"urn:lex:eu:tribunal.justicia:sentencia:2009-06-11;33-08 | ||||
@original:es$text-html:juradmin.eu;jurifast:todo:anonimo" | ||||
Perhaps: | ||||
urn:lex:eu:tribunal.justicia:sentencia:2009-06-11;33-08 | ||||
@original:es$text-html:juradmin.eu;jurifast:todo:anonimo | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Please review each artwork element in the current xml | ||||
file. Specifically, should any artwork element be tagged as <sourcecode>, | ||||
<ul>, <t>, or another element? | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] FYI - We have added expansions for the following abbreviation(s) | ||||
upon first use per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please | ||||
review each expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness. | ||||
Country Code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD) | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online | ||||
Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> | ||||
and let us know if any changes are needed. Updates of this nature typically | ||||
result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers. | ||||
For example, please consider whether the following term should be updated: | ||||
native | ||||
Additionally, please consider whether "tradition" should be updated for | ||||
clarity. While the NIST website | ||||
<https://www.nist.gov/nist-research-library/nist-technical-series-publications-a | ||||
uthor-instructions#table1> | ||||
indicates that this term is potentially biased, it is also ambiguous. | ||||
"Tradition" is a subjective term, as it is not the same for everyone. --> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Please review the capitalization and use of quotation marks with | ||||
"lex" and "LEX". Is there a pattern to follow for these? We listed some | ||||
specific scenarios below; please review and let us know if any updates | ||||
are needed for consistency. | ||||
a) We see inconsistency with the following forms: | ||||
lex schema vs. LEX schema | ||||
lex URN vs. "lex" URN vs. LEX URN | ||||
b) We also see these phrases: | ||||
"lex” namespace | ||||
"lex” NSS | ||||
"lex” space | ||||
"lex” NID syntax | ||||
LEX identifier | ||||
LEX name | ||||
LEX identifier | ||||
LEX governance | ||||
LEX naming convention | ||||
LEX specifications | ||||
c) We also see "LEX" used by itself in the following: | ||||
Original: | ||||
A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX) | ||||
Note: This is the document title. Please also see question #1. | ||||
LEX does this by splitting the identifier | ||||
into parts. | ||||
LEX assumes no | ||||
particular relationship between the originator of the document, | ||||
Registration of LEX | ||||
--> | ||||
<!-- [rfced] Terminology | ||||
a) FYI - We updated instances of "URN LEX" to "LEX URN". | ||||
b) We note inconsistencies in the terms listed below. We chose the form on the | ||||
right. Please let us know any objections. | ||||
urn-lex ID vs. urn:lex ID | ||||
UNICODE vs. Unicode | ||||
Registrar vs. Jurisdictional Registrar | ||||
%-encoded vs. percent-encoded | ||||
c) We note inconsistencies in the terms below throughout the text. Should | ||||
these be uniform? If so, please let us know which form is preferred. | ||||
http vs. HTTP (in the context of "http-based") | ||||
local-name vs. local name | ||||
body vs. Body | ||||
jurisdiction code vs. jurisdiction-code | ||||
Member State vs. member state | ||||
--> | ||||
</back> </rfc> | ||||
End of changes. 381 change blocks. | ||||
2199 lines changed or deleted | 2055 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. |