rfc9633v5.txt		rfc9633.txt
	skipping to change at line 2668 ¶		skipping to change at line 2668 ¶
	B.1. Example A-1: Application Flow Aggregation		B.1. Example A-1: Application Flow Aggregation
	This example illustrates multiple App-flows with the same source,		This example illustrates multiple App-flows with the same source,
	destination, and traffic specification aggregated into a single		destination, and traffic specification aggregated into a single
	DetNet flow service sub-layer. Ingress node 1 aggregates App-flows 0		DetNet flow service sub-layer. Ingress node 1 aggregates App-flows 0
	and 1 into a service sub-layer of DetNet flow 1. Two ways to		and 1 into a service sub-layer of DetNet flow 1. Two ways to
	illustrate this are provided in Figures 1 and 2; the JSON operational		illustrate this are provided in Figures 1 and 2; the JSON operational
	data model [RFC8259] corresponding to the diagrams is then shown in		data model [RFC8259] corresponding to the diagrams is then shown in
	Figure 3. The address format used in this example is IPv6.		Figure 3. The address format used in this example is IPv6.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case A-1 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 1: Case A-1: Application Flow Aggregation		Figure 1: Case A-1: Application Flow Aggregation
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case A-1 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 2: Case A-1: Stack Details for Application Flow Aggregation		Figure 2: Case A-1: Stack Details for Application Flow Aggregation
	Figure 3 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 3 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. "app-0" and "app-1"		aggregation node illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. "app-0" and "app-1"
	are aggregated into service sub-layer ssl-1.		are aggregated into service sub-layer ssl-1.
	{		{
	"ietf-detnet:detnet": {		"ietf-detnet:detnet": {
	"traffic-profile": [		"traffic-profile": [
	skipping to change at line 2882 ¶		skipping to change at line 2884 ¶
	B.2. Example B-1: Aggregation Using a Forwarding Sub-layer		B.2. Example B-1: Aggregation Using a Forwarding Sub-layer
	As illustrated in Figure 4, DetNet service sub-layer flows 1 and 2		As illustrated in Figure 4, DetNet service sub-layer flows 1 and 2
	are aggregated into a single forwarding sub-layer. For the same		are aggregated into a single forwarding sub-layer. For the same
	destination, multiple DetNet flows use a single forwarding path, and		destination, multiple DetNet flows use a single forwarding path, and
	service protection is performed by the corresponding service sub-		service protection is performed by the corresponding service sub-
	layer of each flow. The corresponding XML operational data for node		layer of each flow. The corresponding XML operational data for node
	"Ingress 1" follows.		"Ingress 1" follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case B-1 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 4: Case B-1: Aggregation Using a Forwarding Sub-layer		Figure 4: Case B-1: Aggregation Using a Forwarding Sub-layer
	Figure 5 contains the operational XML configuration for the ingress		Figure 5 contains the operational XML configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 4. In this example, "app-0"		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 4. In this example, "app-0"
	and "app-1" are in separate service sub-layers with MPLS labels, and		and "app-1" are in separate service sub-layers with MPLS labels, and
	the aggregation happens at forwarding sub-layer afl-1, using MPLS		the aggregation happens at forwarding sub-layer afl-1, using MPLS
	labels.		labels.
	<interfaces		<interfaces
	skipping to change at line 3095 ¶		skipping to change at line 3098 ¶
	B.3. Example B-2: Service Aggregation		B.3. Example B-2: Service Aggregation
	As illustrated in Figure 6, DetNet service sub-layer flows 1 and 2		As illustrated in Figure 6, DetNet service sub-layer flows 1 and 2
	are aggregated into a service sub-layer of an aggregated flow.		are aggregated into a service sub-layer of an aggregated flow.
	Multiple DetNet flows with the same requirements for the same		Multiple DetNet flows with the same requirements for the same
	destination are aggregated into a single aggregated DetNet flow, and		destination are aggregated into a single aggregated DetNet flow, and
	service protection and resource allocation are performed by an		service protection and resource allocation are performed by an
	aggregated DetNet flow service sub-layer and forwarding sub-layer.		aggregated DetNet flow service sub-layer and forwarding sub-layer.
	The corresponding JSON operational data for node "Ingress 1" follows.		The corresponding JSON operational data for node "Ingress 1" follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case B-2 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 6: Case B-2: Example Service Aggregation		Figure 6: Case B-2: Example Service Aggregation
	Figure 7 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 7 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 6. In this example, service		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 6. In this example, service
	sub-layer ssl-1 for DetNet flow DN-1 and ssl-2 for DetNet flow DN-2		sub-layer ssl-1 for DetNet flow DN-1 and ssl-2 for DetNet flow DN-2
	aggregate at service sub-layer DetNet flow asl-1. In this example,		aggregate at service sub-layer DetNet flow asl-1. In this example,
	an aggregation service sub-layer, asl-1, is created to aggregate		an aggregation service sub-layer, asl-1, is created to aggregate
	ssl-1 and ssl2, and that label is encapsulated in a separate		ssl-1 and ssl2, and that label is encapsulated in a separate
	forwarding sub-layer, afl-1, with MPLS labels.		forwarding sub-layer, afl-1, with MPLS labels.
	skipping to change at line 3378 ¶		skipping to change at line 3382 ¶
	B.4. Example C-1: DetNet Relay Service Sub-layer		B.4. Example C-1: DetNet Relay Service Sub-layer
	Figure 8 illustrates the DetNet relay node's forwarding sub-layer		Figure 8 illustrates the DetNet relay node's forwarding sub-layer
	flows 1 and 2 aggregated into a single forwarding sub-layer. Service		flows 1 and 2 aggregated into a single forwarding sub-layer. Service
	protection and resource allocation are performed by the corresponding		protection and resource allocation are performed by the corresponding
	service sub-layer and forwarding sub-layer of each flow. Figure 8		service sub-layer and forwarding sub-layer of each flow. Figure 8
	illustrates both aggregation and disaggregation, and the		illustrates both aggregation and disaggregation, and the
	corresponding JSON operational data follows.		corresponding JSON operational data follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case C-1 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 8: Case C-1: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation		Figure 8: Case C-1: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation
	Figure 9 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 9 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 8. In this example, a relay		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 8. In this example, a relay
	performing aggregation at the forwarding sub-layer is illustrated.		performing aggregation at the forwarding sub-layer is illustrated.
	Two DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are replicated at each service		Two DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are replicated at each service
	sub-layer. The two forwarding sub-layers for the upper path are		sub-layer. The two forwarding sub-layers for the upper path are
	aggregated at the forwarding sub-layer with label 20000, and the two		aggregated at the forwarding sub-layer with label 20000, and the two
	forwarding sub-layers for the lower path are aggregated at the		forwarding sub-layers for the lower path are aggregated at the
	skipping to change at line 4178 ¶		skipping to change at line 4183 ¶
	Disaggregation		Disaggregation
	Figure 11 illustrates the DetNet relay node's service sub-layer flows		Figure 11 illustrates the DetNet relay node's service sub-layer flows
	1 and 2 aggregated into a single forwarding sub-layer. Service		1 and 2 aggregated into a single forwarding sub-layer. Service
	protection is performed by the corresponding service sub-layer of		protection is performed by the corresponding service sub-layer of
	each flow, and resource allocation is performed by an aggregated		each flow, and resource allocation is performed by an aggregated
	forwarding sub-layer for all aggregated flows. Figure 11 illustrates		forwarding sub-layer for all aggregated flows. Figure 11 illustrates
	both aggregation and disaggregation, and the corresponding JSON		both aggregation and disaggregation, and the corresponding JSON
	operational data follows.		operational data follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case C-2 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 11: Case C-2: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation		Figure 11: Case C-2: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation
	Figure 12 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 12 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 11. In this example, a relay		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 11. In this example, a relay
	performing aggregation at the forwarding sub-layer is illustrated.		performing aggregation at the forwarding sub-layer is illustrated.
	Two DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are replicated at each service		Two DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are replicated at each service
	sub-layer. Each replicated flow for the service sub-layer for the		sub-layer. Each replicated flow for the service sub-layer for the
	upper path is aggregated at the single forwarding sub-layer with MPLS		upper path is aggregated at the single forwarding sub-layer with MPLS
	label 20000, and each replicated flow for the service sub-layer for		label 20000, and each replicated flow for the service sub-layer for
	skipping to change at line 4763 ¶		skipping to change at line 4769 ¶
	Figure 14 illustrates the DetNet relay node's service sub-layer flows		Figure 14 illustrates the DetNet relay node's service sub-layer flows
	1 and 2 aggregated into a service sub-layer flow. Multiple DetNet		1 and 2 aggregated into a service sub-layer flow. Multiple DetNet
	flows with the same requirements that can use the same path are		flows with the same requirements that can use the same path are
	aggregated into a single aggregated DetNet flow, and service		aggregated into a single aggregated DetNet flow, and service
	protection and resource allocation are performed by the service sub-		protection and resource allocation are performed by the service sub-
	layer and forwarding sub-layer of the aggregated DetNet flow.		layer and forwarding sub-layer of the aggregated DetNet flow.
	Figure 14 illustrates both aggregation and disaggregation, and the		Figure 14 illustrates both aggregation and disaggregation, and the
	corresponding JSON operational data follows.		corresponding JSON operational data follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case C-3 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 14: Case C-3: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation		Figure 14: Case C-3: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation
	Figure 15 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 15 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 14. In this example, a relay		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 14. In this example, a relay
	performing aggregation at the service sub-layer is illustrated. Two		performing aggregation at the service sub-layer is illustrated. Two
	DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are relayed at each service sub-		DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are relayed at each service sub-
	layer with MPLS labels 101 and 104, respectively, and each service		layer with MPLS labels 101 and 104, respectively, and each service
	sub-layer is aggregated at a single service sub-layer flow and		sub-layer is aggregated at a single service sub-layer flow and
	replicated. Figure 16 contains the operational JSON configuration		replicated. Figure 16 contains the operational JSON configuration
	skipping to change at line 5428 ¶		skipping to change at line 5435 ¶
	Figure 17 illustrates the DetNet relay node's forwarding sub-layer		Figure 17 illustrates the DetNet relay node's forwarding sub-layer
	flows 1 and 2 aggregated into a service sub-layer DetNet flow.		flows 1 and 2 aggregated into a service sub-layer DetNet flow.
	Multiple DetNet flows with the same requirements that can use the		Multiple DetNet flows with the same requirements that can use the
	same path are aggregated into a single aggregated DetNet flow.		same path are aggregated into a single aggregated DetNet flow.
	Service protection is performed by the service sub-layer of the		Service protection is performed by the service sub-layer of the
	aggregated DetNet flow, and resource allocation is performed by the		aggregated DetNet flow, and resource allocation is performed by the
	forwarding sub-layer of each aggregated DetNet flow. Figure 17		forwarding sub-layer of each aggregated DetNet flow. Figure 17
	illustrates both aggregation and disaggregation, and the		illustrates both aggregation and disaggregation, and the
	corresponding JSON operational data follows.		corresponding JSON operational data follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case C-4 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 17: Case C-4: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation		Figure 17: Case C-4: Example Service Aggregation/Disaggregation
	Figure 18 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 18 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 17. In this example, a relay		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 17. In this example, a relay
	performing aggregation at the service sub-layer is illustrated. Two		performing aggregation at the service sub-layer is illustrated. Two
	DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are relayed at each service sub-		DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are relayed at each service sub-
	layer. The two DetNet forwarding sub-layer flows with MPLS labels		layer. The two DetNet forwarding sub-layer flows with MPLS labels
	20004 and 20005 are aggregated at the single service sub-layer DetNet		20004 and 20005 are aggregated at the single service sub-layer DetNet
	flow and then replicated. Figure 19 contains the operational JSON		flow and then replicated. Figure 19 contains the operational JSON
	skipping to change at line 6209 ¶		skipping to change at line 6217 ¶
	B.8. Example D-1: Transit Node Forwarding Sub-layer Aggregation/		B.8. Example D-1: Transit Node Forwarding Sub-layer Aggregation/
	Disaggregation		Disaggregation
	As illustrated in Figure 20, at the transit node, forwarding sub-		As illustrated in Figure 20, at the transit node, forwarding sub-
	layer flows 1 and 2 are aggregated into a single forwarding sub-		layer flows 1 and 2 are aggregated into a single forwarding sub-
	layer. Resource allocation is performed by the corresponding		layer. Resource allocation is performed by the corresponding
	forwarding sub-layer for all aggregated flows. Figure 20 illustrates		forwarding sub-layer for all aggregated flows. Figure 20 illustrates
	both aggregation and disaggregation, and the corresponding JSON		both aggregation and disaggregation, and the corresponding JSON
	operational data follows.		operational data follows.
	Please consult the PDF or HTML copy for the Case D-1 diagram.		(Artwork only available as svg: see
			https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9633.html)
	Figure 20: Case D-1: Example Transit Node Forwarding Aggregation/		Figure 20: Case D-1: Example Transit Node Forwarding Aggregation/
	Disaggregation		Disaggregation
	Figure 21 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress		Figure 21 contains the operational JSON configuration for the ingress
	aggregation node illustrated in Figure 20. In this example, a		aggregation node illustrated in Figure 20. In this example, a
	transit node performing aggregation at the forwarding sub-layer is		transit node performing aggregation at the forwarding sub-layer is
	illustrated. Two DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are transmitted at		illustrated. Two DetNet flows -- DN-1 and DN-2 -- are transmitted at
	each forwarding sub-layer. The DetNet forwarding sub-layer flows		each forwarding sub-layer. The DetNet forwarding sub-layer flows
	with MPLS labels 10002 and 10006 are aggregated at the single		with MPLS labels 10002 and 10006 are aggregated at the single
End of changes. 9 change blocks.
	9 lines changed or deleted		18 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48.